How they dress is barely relevant.
lol icarus flew too close to the sun and got noticed by the janny and is rightfully getting his threads deleted for spam
>>18710807Why did it take so long? Janny applications have something to do with it!
>>18710839*? not !
>>18710807There must be a whole section of hell just for these spamming retards.
>>18710854>retardsIt's probably the same guy every time.
>>18710754Barbell squats and no makeup, sometimes a high quality fragrance
>>18710754Slutty
>>18710871Based Asian girl teaching white bitches the value of feet.
>>18710875Yes
>>18710754Hipster girl art hoe
>>18710754green sweater
>>18710754„Less is more“. That includes body fat percentage.
A basic white gurl look like VSCO or your typical blonde into LuLu Lemon. I don’t see the appeal of “classy” women who look like they’re from Seinfeld.
>>18710754As much as this is a spam thread like others mentioned I still do actually like the question itself.For me I like it when a woman shows skin while also keeping other parts covered up so she doesn't verge into slutty territory. So let's say she's showing A LOT of leg but then her upper body is almost completely covered up. Like for example the somewhat "controversial" per se short shorts and hoodie look. I love that. Or let's say she's showing midriff or showing cleavage (just one or the other not both) but arms and legs are completely covered otherwise. As in like she's wearing long pants and long sleeves but has some cleavage showing. Or as in she's wearing long pants and long sleeves and has some midriff showing. And for midriff I personally much prefer when she actually shows the belly button rather than the pants being so high waisted they almost completely cover her entire stomach. And then lastly for arms I guess it depends on if we're talking short sleeves or completely sleeveless. For short sleeves you can show a bit more skin as in like showing leg but not your entire leg. But for sleeveless, especially since depending on the size of the boobs of the woman you can also get some potential subtle sideboob for better or worse, especially if she's braless, so again long sleeves and long pants.
>>18713869Oh, and I almost forgot, or wasn't sure if I should mention this or not, but BACKS...since backs are usually less provocative than cleavage or midriffs I guess you can show some skin with backs but not excessive obviously. Like short sleeves sure but not sleeveless. Or you can show your legs but not your entire legs. No midriff or cleavage though.
>>18713869>>18713876i can sort of see why you didn't mention back because i can't really think of any usual outfits for women that show just the back and nothing else. like for example i can't remember the last time i saw a woman showing her back but not also showing cleavage at the same time because the top will usually be equally low cut both in the front and in the back or else i feel it'd look awkward if it was low cut on only one side but not the other
>>18713888well there are backless dresses and shit but now that i think of it every backless dress i've ever seen has been relatively low cut on the front as well and also sleeveless too. seems like it's impossible to show just the back and only the back alone. seems impossible to show the back without showing something else. obviously though you can still keep your midriff and legs covered
80's / 90's preppy
>>18713846seinfeld style is kino
long t shirt no panties
stockings
>>18713911Ooooh that's so daring! I've actually seen some (usually college aged) women dress like this out in public. The long shirt or long hoodie look with short shorts underneath is a really common look for young women and most of them are wearing short shorts underneath but when I saw them raise their arms really high to stretch it turns out some of them were wearing only panties underneath and some others were wearing absolutely nothing.
>>18713915>dress like this out in publicokay that's actually kinda gross. it's one thing when it's your girlfriend or wife doing that in the privacy of your own home or her own home but doing that shit in public is just unhygienic as hell. not to mention the risk of getting an infection that way
Women are so simple-minded. Sometimes it's like nothing goes on in their heads at all.
>>18713925I wouldn't consider myself PC in the slightest but come the fuck on...this is not exclusive to just women. Even on this site, even on this board in general. It's like some of these people are actual literal mental retards, not just regular stupid people. Shit gets even more retarded on /b/ which has basically no rules. And there are very few, if any women on here.
>>18713926Watch OP's video again and try to drum up a comparable amount of brainlessness from a man.
>>18713933I mean there was literally a guy on the internet who shoved a glass jar up his ass and the jar broke inside his ass and he began to bleed like crazy and had to take himself to the hospital to remove the glass shards deep inside his rectum...I don't think it gets any more brainless than that. And this was also way before TikTok got big with people doing stupid shit for attention. He did it just simply because he wanted to.
>>18713941You talk like a stupid woman.Chasing sexual gratification, even really deviant gratification, at least has some basis in human impulses. It's a far cry from putting a series of unremarkable clips in your hair and filming it like nothing is going on in your head or life.
>>18713957>To be fair, you need a very high IQ to understand glass shards embedded deep in the anus
>>18713957Wait...are you seriously trying to defend a guy who stuck a glass jar up his ass? Like the hair clip shit is stupid and all but in no way comparable to a guy literally sticking a glass jar up his ass. The jar guy is a billion times more stupid than the hair clip girl and it's not even close.
>>18713925>People in general are so simple-minded. Sometimes it's like nothing goes on in their heads at all.
>>18713957The impulse to make yourself appealing to the opposite sex by simply putting clips on your hair still sounds less braindead than jar guy. Why are you so mad at dumb ladies
>>18714155For real. Not sure why so many guys like to act like women are responsible for all the problems going on in the world. I've met borderline actually mentally disabled (as in Jesus fucking Christ how are they still alive?) people of both sexes of all ages (literal children get more leniency but there's no excuse for people who are 40 and up to be that dumb) and of all races. Both men and women are retarded as fuck. I wouldn't even be surprised if a superior much more intelligent alien race suddenly enslaved us all.
