>13 watch threadsCongratulations
and all of them are piles of steaming shit
even though im an adult with a wife and children and a business, i have applied to the janny position solely to be able to ban watch thread posters. Lets hope I get the job.
>>18714591>>18684906>>18703293>>18713032>>18710950>>18686394>>18697654>>18707936>>18708061>>18711769>>18676287>>18706082>>18708077Congratulations
>>18714959so you found:>several generals that hit the bump limit>several threads for specific watches/discussions that would get ignored in the generalsshouldn't be an issue honestly, the same happens with other generals, e.g. specific fragrance questions and specific shoe questions. then you have>watch general>cheap watch generala split caused by some animals wanting to discuss cheaper watches without getting yapped at. and finally >split bake for watch generalthis is the only one that is really annoying
>>18714971>animalsshould be "anons", kek
its not really even fashion, it should be moved to another board. Tech, Toys, or given a sub board of its own.
>>18714979>Watch threads being moved to /toy/
I like to lurk here to laugh at the state of the board. We all went to discord btw.
>>18714858>>18714860>>18714861>>18714863>>18714864>>18714866>>18714867>>18714868>>18714869>>18714871>>18714872>>18714873>>18714874Congratulations
>>18714996only trannies use discord bro
>>18714959You missed the thread I made with Alain Delon wearing a Cartier Pasha.
>>18714875Sexo I wish I could buy one and restore it all comfy like
>>18714979Accessories are peak fashion can elevate, make, break an outfit
>>18715240>>18715404Wristwatches definitely belong here. Hell, they're the only form of 'jewelry' its even really acceptable for men to wear. That's like banning necklaces for women.
>>18715404Makes sense I guess. Holy shit can they go on about nothing. >>18715447There are no other general threads on /fa/ except for fragrances, which is equally out of place here. There is no jewelry general, no sneaker thread, the only staple of the board was WAYWT but that died off and gets shitted up by the watch autists too. If they were stylish it might make sense, but they have zero taste, they're fashion-retarded the same way 90% of car guys will spend 60k on some custom job and then step out of the thing looking like a fat slob. Their obsession with the aesthetic of their special interest seems to have no crossover with their clothing, it's some weird lipstick on a pig situation and it attracts the most boring people on the planet.
>>18715464>There are no other general threads on /fa/ except for fragrancesAnd boots, and denim, and /tip/, and skincare, and thinspo which arguably belongs even less on /fa/ and should be on /fit/.It's just that the watch threads have a handful of truly terrible posters in a constant faceoff seeing who will shit up the thread first>four or five guys, three of which are clearly identified (grand seiko blogposter, citizen coffee spamer, weekdater guy) who think spamming copypasta and reposting the same stuff over and over is funny and who think clogging up a slow board by making new threads at 250 posts is epic trolling>another four guys who act as hostile as possible to the first group, initially started by a pretty identifiable poster who most likely isn't here anymore but the process of killing the conversation out of spite lives onThere's probably ten to fifteen posters in the watch threads in total. And since so much of it is shit flinging and the spammers find it funny to spam threads while the anti-spammers try to make counter-threads, the entire board takes the fall.All of this could be stopped ifthe board had poster ID so retards would stop fighting ghosts.
>>18715580For me it’s bc I think they’re /fa/ af I also love the engineering and craftsmanship component Then there’s the historical aspect I just like them If I weren’t homeless I’d probably have 1 for special occasions
>>18714948Thats a cool watch, what model is it exactly?
>>18716082It’s Timex: Homo edition and you are the all time best contender for winning one.
>>18714971>several generals that hit the bump limityou know on other slow boards they’ll keep posting in the old general for several days to not clog up the catalog.
Why though? 1 out of every 10 threads is a watch thread? That's ridiculous.
people who obsess over watches this much are bugpeople
>>18716443This is technically a /wt/Witness our hubris.
>>18716525You know people like Citizenfag have steam blowing out of their ears every time a thread calls them out
>>18716704It's a thread about watches, isn't it?
>>18714974No no.Animals is DEFINITELY correct
>>18715239A watche barely adds to an outfit, lets be real here. If anything, it usually takes away from a fit by being obnoxiously out of place most times, which is something these writstwatchfags seem to not try at avoiding
>>18716772Lol funny you say that when a handbag is more fashionable than a watch will ever be.
>>18714989/Watch/ General but it has to be a toy made for kidsNo doubt will be more interesting than all these clogging threads they keep posting
Hey, OP. You're a stinkin' weeb. What watch is this?
>>18716897nice
The thing about watches is that you can be into it for 10 years and still discover a new brand every day.Then, because there's a whole unregulated spectrum of specifications and pricetags, each brand is its own rabbit hole.
Is the thread auto-saging?
>>18716805Looks like a Panerai 104
>>18716805looks way too big on himWho does he think he is? Arnold Shwarzenigger?
WE DID IT!WE FUCKING WON!
if a general exists around a class of product (mechanical keyboards, mice, headphones, in ear monitors, watches, etc) then it is actually just a playground for marketers and consumer whores. any other secret ancient oldfag wisdom i should lay down while i'm here?
Yeah it's pretty obnoxious, huh?
>>18718009This is a great one though. Cheers, bitch.
>>18718084I enjoyed it, even ejaculated.
>>18714979watches are purses for men
Watches are useless now, we're not in the 60s, everybody have a smartphone. Caring about this "hobby" is just faggotry
Because I wanna grab something from my pocket to check the time u fucking bitchnigger
>>18718311>Watches are useless now, we're not in the 60s, everybody have a smartphone.And then smartwatches happened. And Casio is still doing well, almost 15 years since smartphones became popular.Ouch.It's like nobody ever liked the idea of getting that 6 inch brick from the pocket just to check how many minutes have passed since he ordered his grease burger.
>>18718669>Very few people wear a smart watch.OK.
>>18718761Are you implying that animals are wearing smartwatches?I mean, it’s just easier to accept that a thing you don’t like is popular.
>>18718782>Are you implying that animals are wearing smartwatches?There’s no way he’s not going to respond with racism, lmao.
>>18718785>moving the goalposts
>>18718669I love my Garmin for running, cycling or hiking, but I’d never wear it as a watch. I don’t really think of it as a watch at all. More like a piece of athletic gear.However, I know tons of people who wear Apple Watches and love them.
>>18718797No it actually is.>very few people wear smartwatches >ok, sales of smartwatches are really high so someone is wearing them >yeah but it’s most old women … and they don’t count.If he’d said initially that smartwatches were only worn by old women then the sales figures would be irrelevant.
>>18718871the janny is a watchthread fag tho, i think its the coffee time loser
Love a good watch thread.
>>18718759I feel like this is an unfair comparison because of the differences in pricing and how they are marketed. Smartwatches are not only much cheaper but they're often comped or discounted when you buy certain phones or mobile plans, so it makes a lot of sense that they'd move a lot of units and there's a lot of room to play funny games with the numbers.It might be like saying Casio is better or more popular than Rolex because they sell more units. Well, yeah, they sell watches for $20 in wal-mart, of course they sell a shitload of watches.
>>18718878We're in for a big melty if that day ever comes
>>18719179Then you don't know the definition of spam.
Thanks for fighting the good fight, brother.
>>18715488>>18716000>>18716066>>18716199>>18716399>>18716899>>18717800>>18718311>>18718799>>18719488>>18720399>>18720566
checkem
>>18722218>not using catalog
thinking i'll put up another one
>>18722596W i will never be able to afford clothes again so i don’t care but the autist in me likes looking at watches
>>18722598idc they make me relax looking at them
>>18722597wtf u attractive
>>18722597>>18723043nigga you actually look like Tobias Forge
>>18715580Tankfags are grooming unsuspecting watch autists with those posts
>He got banned again Lmao
Lmao
Line of cocaine
Bump
>>18725192Finger condoms?
>>18725397
My name is Josh.
I'm looking at a variety of dive watches I'd like to buy. I'm glad we have so many watch threads in which to have such discussions.
Sometimes I like to run the strap through the keepers like this.Good watch thread.
>>18726721No one is trying to obscure or hide your thread. Nor is it some indictment of the other ones that's sending any message. It's its own watch thread now. You're not doing anything to stop or even slow the creation of more. Here's another watch for this watch thread.
I miss my SpongeBob Burger King value meal watch
https://youtu.be/UFRB9y2ey1Q?si=JPQn5hyfmf2ViSMP
>>18726829You may want to check the definition of that word before wielding it ignorantly like that again. We're celebrating watches in this thread which has failed to make watch threads look bad or bring awareness to the fact that you don't like them. It's called The Streisand Effect, and you'll know better next time.
>>18726833You're throwing a fit right now because you're upset that no one thinks this is a designer clothing board. You stand in front of a mirror with your matching pants and shoes and hat and purse or whatever and no one will bother you.
>>18726859The catalogue would suggest otherwise. Sorry.
Returning watch thread enjoyer here, why is there like 20 watch threads on /fa/ now?
>>18726863Wrong? And you're pretending to laugh at just how wrong I am?It's clearly a watch board. There are more watch threads than the threads of any other combined topic.This is a watch thread.This guy >>18726862 enjoys watch threads.And yet you stupidly laugh as you deny the reality in front of you: You're posting in a watch thread right now.
I can get a real tourbillon for $290. Should I do it?
why is janny deleting posts in the thread instead of just deleting the fucking thread haha
I want this real bad. You're welcome for the bump. That's why I'm doing it. I want more people to see the watches in this watch thread. It's on purpose. We're on the same team here.
>>18727060The specific watchfag in here is a self-confessed ban evader
Bumping this watch thread with more watches.
>>18727166Are watches being deleted?
>>18727279Seething means very angry I thought. I'm happily posting watches in this watch thread. I also just made another one. Cheers.
>>18727295Won't matter when it gets wiped after the janny catches you ban evading again
>>18727298I don't think so. These posts aren't going anywhere. I'm not banned. Stop listening to the voices in your head, pal.
>>18727320You're welcome. We're all in this together. Thank YOU for the bump. Here's another one I'm happy to give. Have you checked out the NEW watch thread yet? It's sure to keep everyone entertained and informed for the next month or more. You'll be long gone by then, having learned your lesson. But for now let's all contribute more watches to this watch thread which strangely has gay foreign cartoons of some kind in the OP instead of watches. I guess I can forgive the OP for that grievous blunder.
Sweet watch thread. Have a bump.
>>18727380Who? Where? Which posts are you predicting will be removed? I don't see any of them disappearing. How long until this happens?
It’s five o’ clock somewhere.
Congratulations
>>18727389Suddenly there are rules in watch threads? I can exclusively post my own watches on my wrist if that makes you happier. No shortage of options here at Casa de Wristwatch.Let’s keep bumping so this thread stays number one.
This Militado is such an amazing watch for the money. I highly recommend it. I have two in fact. That’s how much I enjoy them.
Another Militado. This one on a Harris tweed strap. Very simple and well built.
Another bump for this weird watch thread. Keeping ‘er on page one as best I can.
I'm bumping the thread out of spite for OP
>>18728987OP loves bumps however they come. Especially when they include more watches for his watch enthusiasm thread.
>>18729367You're a clever one. Don't you remember any other insults they yelled at you back in school?Have another watch, watchboy.
;)
>>18729686Yes, that's the intention. Do you think you're at odds with me? I'm on your team.
>>18729686I think you mean >TANKS for the Bump. This thread and the “watch chads” thread have been up way too long btw.
By "watch" threads you must be referring to the shitter threads.
Oh my, a watch thread. Time to bump it.
I am melted
knights of the round tablepure class
average thinspo thread BLOWS the fuck out of any watch "discussion" thread. congrats on having a piece of shit on your wrist that is indistinguishable to women and only appreciated by 300 lb autists
>>18733616you’re not wrong but how can you deny accessories elevate an outfit or help to cultivate a vibe?
>>18736506yes i did me doing my best homeless with some student loan money
>>18736506Ai putting my dream watch (navitimer) on my fit
>>18736435i appreciate your response. In my view, the best accessory for an outfit is a hot body, by being thin
>>18736548you’re not wrong, especially for the male gaze but female attraction is infinitely more multi faceted
>>18736506>Nobody in those threads has posted a full fit to prove what their watches are accessorizing. Not even once.>those threads being "watch" threads>>18736507>posts a picture without a watch
>>18736571i think for the female gaze, they are making more male models to be twinks. Though, I suspect the real reason is that they want to make men be more gay because gay men are basically women and women drive 80% of consumer decisions. With respect to women and "recognition" of a watch: they know that men are "into" watches the same way they might say that men are into video games, that is, they only understand the association - not specific knowledge about the topic. Therefore, a woman might recognize a rolex or some other namebrands as a high quality luxury watch, but the watches are virtually indistinguishable to women after a few hundred dollars in value. And think about it, what would it mean if a woman was able to correctly identify that a watch one was wearing was tens of thousands of dollars in value? That she has the same ability as a 300 lb watch autist to sniff out a high value item? Despite my cynicism, they do have use being a basic jewelry piece for men, but after a certain price tag, there are just diminishing returns on what it does for you.
>>18736435i also want to share a story about something that happened to me at work. I work for a national program at a prestigious government institution in the US. We were all taken into a virtual meeting where our program director was joined by a senior official at our washington DC org, where he announced a re-organization of the DC part of our institution. He was short, fat and balding. He aimed his camera angle and his body posture in such a manner that his wrist and his big ass fat orange watch was front and center of the screen, and he made adjustments to his camera whenever he adjusted his hand posture. For this senior but not publicly visible official/executive, he probably hasno family, no life outside of work, no rizz, but he did have probably a 10k watch on and made sure to flex it on us wagies
>>18714875Gendo is /fa/ as fuck and did nothing wrong
>>18737368Gendo was a simp. But you're right, he's /fa/ as fuck. How does that triangle work?
>>18714875/fa/ needs to be renamed /wa/
>>18736506>fitlol
>>18736776As you can guess from here >>18736509 he is a homeless man who adds the Nautilus watch into his photos with AI because he’s too poor to afford one.
>every watch thread bumped simultaneously>140 / 58 / 5
>>18732707Don't get me wrong I think this looks badass but.....what in the world could you possibly wear this with? Looks like some Flava Flav shit. Isn't it a bit gaudy? Again, I think it looks dope by its own merits, no hate here.
