are chucks feminine?
>>18721786is OP a homosexual?
>>18721787chucks arent gay. as a straight person i wear them all the time
they're young people coded, so if you equate neoteny with feminine traits, then yes.
twink shoes
>>18721786I believe they are unisex. And considered so by most.
>>18721787yes
>>18722114can confirm
PSA: Dont reply to spam threads
>>18721786Everything women wear today was originally made for men. Chucks, Sambas, jeans, trousers, t-shirts, button up shirts, blazers, sunglasses. Nothing bonus holes wear is their own. It was all appropriated from men starting from the WW1 when more and more women began working in factories. So, no, chucks are for men.
>>18722181Chucks are for basketballers. Stolen valour if you wear them but don't ball. Same polo shirts too. You need to ride a horse.
>>18722220That’s not even the original purpose of a ”polo shirt”. It was designed as a tennis shirt and later adopted into the sport of polo.
>>18722227You've got that backwards. They were always polo shirts, for centuries. They were adopted as tennis shirts after some Bongs saw Indian playing polo wearing those shirts.
>>18722220i played varsity in high school, good enough?the military used them as trainers too btw.
>>18722220the highs are basketball shoes but the low tops and colored ones were marketed as fashion shoes from day 1.
>>18722238That’s just a short sleeved shirt which doesn’t even have a collar and probably isn’t pique fabric.
>>18722274>doesn’t even have a collarYes it does.
they're for girls or leftoid men (feminine men)
>>18721786yes
they don't even look feminine just childish
>>18721786Gender neutral ugly overrated NPC shoes
Buy the ones with love hearts on them. More masculine that way desu
>>18722562don't do this
>>18722326Doesn’t seem that way.
