It's tacky and gives off a vibe of opulence, it signal others that they are doing well financially. Please never come back and post here

>>18723506
GUCCI is based and you are poor

i mean, its just that in my case gucci resembles my name. im a gorilla dressed in gucci

>>18723538
Ironically, it's the poors that love to wear Gucci these days. See >>18723536 and OP's picture.

>>18723536
I usually walk around in fits that cost thousands of dollars too but nobody would be able to tell even if they actually gave a fuck about what I'm wearing since the aesthetics are pretty minimalist
Do people actually like the look of being plastered with branding and logos or is it JUST about signaling that you're doing well financially (assuming you're not poor BECAUSE you bought all that)

>>18723536
Whenever I see someone dressed like OP's pic I assume they're on welfare