All watches welcome.
I don’t wear this enough.
I'm guessing the ambient display is some kind of LCD as it's readable in bright conditions but invisible in the dark. >>18723738Put it on a more casual strap, like a perlon, will make it more wearable
I just got my Corum Admiral's Cup lmao
>>18723757What’s funny?
>>18723759It's a complete 90s shitter and I think it's hilarious
>>18723752Good idea. I don’t have a lot of 18mm straps but I like these tweeds on almost everything.That mesh it came on always seemed too ritzy. I’ll buy more 18s.
>>18723737Underwater in a rebreather scuba system?
>>18723764Good take. Am gonna have a battery put in my Fossil, my mom gave it to me for my 16th birthday. In the 90's.
do you guys use the auto light feature on your casio's?
You guys said 37mm wouldn't look too big!
>>18723834No, but I would probably use it if I rode my bike or ran at night. I have the GW-BX5600-1A1.
>>18723837get a panerai on that wrist
>>18723735
>>18723837Which ref is this?
>>18723900SLGB005 "Violet Dawn"
Gold Tank with black alligator: is there a more classic combination?
>>18723875That's nice. Is it a bi-directional rotating bezel? Old skin-divers from that era had bi-directional bezels.I bet it would look great with an old-style Tropic rubber strap.The only things I would change would be to use normal colored lume instead of the ugly, piss-yellow lume; and I would have swapped the "Automatic" and WR 100m" and made the text size equal.
>>18723926>You mean the fauxtina hands? The same as the Hamilton in OP and the Murph and tons of other vintage looking watches?Yeah, I don't like it.Not only does it not perform as well as other colors, it doesn't even actually look that much like aged tritium. It's just an ugly color, in my opinion.I think you can make something look old-fashioned without deliberately trying to make it look old. People will still recognize it as an old-style watch.Plus, when all those old tritium watches were new, the tritium lume was bright white anyway.
Poopin time
>>18723937
>>18723897>>18723937>>18723941>SCATthe legacy lives on
>>18723837wristlet
>>18723905I like the Tank Solo's case shape, personally, but I understand why they went with the Tank Must's Louis Cartier-esque shape.I just wish Cartier hadn't cheapened the watch in the process. The Solo had sapphire glass to the Must's mineral glass. The Solo had an opaline dial to the Must's plain white dial. I think the cabochon material in the crown is different as well. And, of course, the Solo had a gold option (even if it's caseback was steel)
only good watch in this thread: >>18723905
>>18723905Yellow gold is kind of trashy, imo.
>>18723977>Yellow gold is kind of trashy, imo.Pleb-tier take. Yellow gold is classic. Sure, wearing A TON of yellow gold is gross but a small, gold, classic dress watch in yellow gold is the epitome of elegance.
Cartier has made so many variations on the Tank over the years and so many of them are terrible. (1919) Tank (now known as the Tank Normale) (1921) Tank Cintrée (1922) Tank Louis Cartier (1922) Tank Chinoise (1922) Tank Allongée (1923) Tank Obus (and Obus Savonette) (1928) Tank à Guichet (1931) Tank Etanché (1932) Tank Basculante (1935) Tank Monopussoir (1936) Tank Asymétrique (1977) Must de Cartier Tank (1989) Tank Américaine (1996) Tank Française (2002) Tank Divan (2004) Tank Solo (2012) Tank Anglaise (2013) Tank MC (2021) Tank Must
Finally received my GMW-B5000TVA-1JR. I had concerns that it would be uncomfortable, but the link articulation and shape of the lugs+case is excellent. It drapes over my wrist perfectly, and very light considering the construction quality. I also didn't think I would appreciate the bluetooth stuff, but it's so convenient. Also, I've owned square G-Shocks before, but this one feels thinner. I haven't compared the dimensions with other variants, but that's how it feels on the wrist.
>>18723993Your short list unfortunately leaves off the important “Pre-Must” model 15705 introduced in 1969.
>>18723993Yet Ronde is their best model. They really should get their shit together.
>>18724000>Your short list unfortunately leaves off the important “Pre-Must” model 15705 introduced in 1969.Yes, you're right. Is that the one that used Cartier's innovative case construction of attaching the caseback with glue?
>>18724001The Santos-Dumont is their best model. The perfect balance of dressiness and sportiness.
>>18724002In that list above the 15705 is pretty much the only major release from roughly wwii to 1977 and the Must. The pre-Must was just an even cheaper first time at reaching mass appeal that the Must more successfully won ten years later.
>>18724003No, it's not. The best model is the Ronde. Disagree or reply to me and you mom will die in her sleep tonight.
>>18724009>Rondelmfao tastelet. A Ronde is simply a cope Calatrava.
>>18724015This. Why would you go to a brand that is known for innovative shaped watches and select a boring round watch?It's telling that the Ronde de Cartier name showed up in the 1980s just as Patek's 3919 became known as "the Banker's watch". Cartier claims they've been making round watches since the 1930s but like with the Pasha, Cartier has never really been forthcoming with details. Meanwhile, they have pictures and schematics of watches like the Tank Cintree and are more than happy to go into every detail. >>18724008>the 15705 is pretty much the only major release from roughly wwii to 1977 and the Must.There were other releases, like the Crash, but the Tank line had more or less settled into a groove while the three semi-independent Cartier houses in Paris, London and New York were each going through their own troubles.
>>18724039The “Crash” isn’t even a tank though. It’s entirely its own watch and is based off a melted version of the Baignoire.
>>18724040I did not mean to imply that a Crash was a variant of the Tank. I meant that Cartier was still coming up with other designs while the Tank lineup was static
>>18723993Tanks for the info
after 2 years of regular wear, bretty gud
>>18723998Post pictures. What other squares have you owned? Surely the titanium is throwing you off a bit too think it's magically thinner
>>18724079I've previously owned the GMW-B5000D-1CCR, GW-5000U-1JF and GW-S5600U-1. The B5000D felt thicker and heavier than the B5000TVA-1JR for sure, and the bracelet on the B5000D never felt comfortable to me.The comfort is the thing I am liking the most out of this one. I'll be keeping it for a long time I think.
Whiskie time.
>>18724092I wish they'd redo the GMW-B5000TB with a MIP module, the GMW-BZ5000BD is kind of close but titanium would make it perfect.
>>18724098This baby is more hygienic than the 50 IQ attention starved scat poster
>>18724124About equal in terms of emotional intelligence, though.
>>18723837Anything under 55mm is too small.
>>18724098>anon doesn't know what vernix is.>>18724106Cool hands.
Are these bezels not actually green? Every other shot I see looks like a black bezel.
>>18724214AI slop
>>18724214AI is doing a great job of ruining the internet
I'm going to buy one of these when I go to japan. Also going to buy some iron heart jeans, a type 1, a wabash shirt, and a wabash apron. Until then I'm cool with just my san martin gmt. I have too many guitars to buy.
>>18724265Sombrero is cool but it's a dive watch that doesn't let you rotate the bez under water. Sad!What is type 1?
>>18724278
>>18724214kek i made that with ai earlier this year asking if anons thought they should make a green bezel version
>>18724265Hey i got myself a kuoe recently.
>>18724265>I'm going to buy one of these when I go to japan.cringe as fuckFags who do this have a fantasy in their head that people will come to them and say>Wow, nice watch, where did you get it?and they will answer>Oh, that thing? That's just a KUOE as we call it, in JAPAN. I got it in JAAPAAAAN, no biggie ya know, i like to do that when i'm in JAAAAAAAAAAPAAAAAAAN you know, i am quite le traveler, you know, i have an adventurous life.
>>18724296Did you show your hairy cock in onsens?
>>18724300On onsens? No.
>>18724299For me it's because the msrp is significantly lower without the export costs and I'm a cheap fuck which is why I have a san martin. I did just buy a $3000 taylor gold label but guitars actually do something unlike watches
>>18724305In another sense, guitars do exactly the same thing as watches, in that neither gets you, personally, laid.
>>18724265What is so special about this brand? Is it just some sort of viral marketing campaign? The main watch reporting sites started posting articles about it all at the same time. All of the components they use seem to be off the shelf as far as I can tell, you can literally see them being used in other microbrands. And the movements they use are usually the same, off the shelf miyota calibres.
Good morning gentlemen. I'm enjoying the Air-King once again.
>>18724308It's cool looking and like $800 in japan
>>18724306I'm married. I mean one is just jewelry and the other is a practice that is good for your brain and you can never stop getting better at or creating things with.
>>18724311wow, in Japan, crazy
>>18724313You don't need multiple guitars or expensive guitars, though. You're a gear-queer. Arguing about Kevin Shields' setup on guitar forums is not music.
>>18724308>What is so special about this brand? Is it just some sort of viral marketing campaign?It's trying to recast a microbrand around this idea that some wizened old Japanese artisan is hand-crafting each watch. Western weebs go bananas for that shit.
>>18724315Yeah not on acoustic guitars. I don't know who kevin shields is. I just downsized everything to an hx stomp and a single jazzmaster because I was sick of the size of everything when moving. I got the taylor after I snapped the headstock off an epiphone el00 I had for 12 years. I have 3 guitars, an electric, a classical, and a steel string.
>>18724318Thanks. Now take it to /mu/ or something because no one here cares and it's off-topic to boot. You sound like the faggot from a couple weeks ago who tried to steer the conversation to his photography equipment.
>>18724318I may sell this jazzmaster and get a prs or suhr tele next. Or maybe a prs vela semihollow. The jazzmaster still feels fairly sloppy and the neck pickup is worthless and sounds like shit.
>>18724321Just buy fewer things you actually like. Same applies to watches. You need like 2 or 3 and that's it. I gave away a couple and will be doing so with another 2 so all I have is a sport watch and my gmt.
Why are there like 10 watch threads at any given time? I don’t think it’s just people really liking watches that much.
>>18724332It's a watch board.
>>18724337Can I get a real answer and not a smartass answer?
>>18724339This is the general. There is a second general for buyers of inexpensive (generally sub-500 dollar) watches. Those two threads make sense since the buyers of inexpensive watches generally get upset when people talk about more expensive watches.The other dozen or so watch threads were all spammed by one user who keeps bumping them. The threads were created in response to complaints by others about there being too many watch threads. These complaints were reasonable because one user (probably the same guy who created all the other threads) thinks it's funny to create a new /wt/ thread well before the previous one is at the bump limit.
>>18724344So why doesn’t the janitor do anything?
>>18724344Why are you so anal about it? Are you the turd anon?Is this why you post your turds in every thread?
>>18724348I don't know, you should ask him.>>18724352If I was the shit poster, I would be posting pictures of shit. But now that you mention it, there is only one poster who uses the word "turd" as often as you do. Do you have an Indian IP, by any chance?
I love it bros...
NEW THREAD:>>18724367>>18724367>>18724367>>18724367
>>18724365It's just a fun watch.
>>18724357This is a load of shit and you know it. Explain the shitshow that happened in /g/.
>>18724349Sorry, they're just a lot more interesting than watches. After 3hz vs 4hz, power reserves, the 3 main complications, crystal materials, the ~6 main styles, the ~4 main bracelet styles, what else is there to talk about? I think the sony wena bracelets are pretty cool. I may buy one of those in japan as well
>>18724384Watch threads started over at /g/ and eventually got banned thus creating an exodus here.
>>18724388Yeah. Watches are fashion accessories.
>>18724392Then why do anons never post entire fits to compliment these watches or vice versa? It’s always coffee cups, keyboards or hairy wrists.
>>18724392Yeah but I go on /g/ and am an IT consultant. I also am interested in the boot threads and technical and heritage /out/ clothes. Fashion is pretty stupid but tool clothes and high quality craftsmanship or technical function is cool. These threads from what I can tell on wrists is mostly people from /g/ who wre morbidly obese but also make good enough money to blow it on things like watches
>>18724404I also go on /fit/. To me if I can't see a vein, you're obese
>>18724403>b-b-b-but what ME????!!!! The world doesn't revolve around you.Watch threads belong to /fa/ because 99% of watches are fashion accessories.
>>18724406I'm not saying they don't. Just explaining to the people here who chase trends what happened and why we are shitting up the board that once was mostly trendy designer clothes or meme tumblr trends like 'lunareave' and 'palewave' and has devolved to be just boot and watch threads
>Yeah but I go on /g/ and am an IT consultant. I also am interested in the boot threads and technical and heritage /out/ clothes. Fashion is pretty stupid but tool clothes and high quality craftsmanship or technical function is cool. These threads from what I can tell on wrists is mostly people from /g/ who wre morbidly obese but also make good enough money to blow it on things like watches
>>18724409Over 20% is definitionally overfat. Under that and you would have some veins. Not morbidly obese but everybody is definately fat.
>>18724426I believe in being better than the gap
>>18724401Post fit
>>18724449delicious
Casio time
>>18724357>"I have over 100 dogshit watches and I change them every few hours. I wear at least 4 different ones a day, because they are dogshit and I don't connect with any of them. I'm more of a compulsive shopper than a watch aficionado. Please help me, I can't stop myself. I try not to inundate the forum with tons of wrist shots, but I give zero fucks about shilling for AliExpress. Always too excessive, never post the same dogshit watch listing twice." Ftfy
I see the neurodivergent crowd has arrived. They need their daily dose of attention.
>>18724481This is a watch thread.
Is this a good watch?
>>18724571It will be better once you remove the magnifier, which can be easily done with a lighter and a razorblade.
>>18724571no
>>18724622magnificent my friend
>>18724210That's not vermin. Nice cope. That's eczema. You produced a genetic dead end
>>18724310Nice seiko sports 5
>>18724364Cute grandpacore
>>18724658Wow that took you forever this time to post. I was expecting this when I posted about the 15705 earlier in the thread.
>>18724658You're as bad as the toilet poster, constantly spamming your AI slop.
Have a fuck weekend nerd
Iced cappuccino
>>18724308They're decent looking, relatively inexpensive, and good for wristlets with their small diameters. I have two myself. I actually have gotten several compliments on the royal smith fwiw. The bronze one I let my 9 month old son play with and chew on.Is it some incredible amazing brand? No, but that said their overall finish and design is worlds better than equivalently priced Seikos so you don't feel like you're wearing a sad compromise because you can't afford what you really want (which is Seiko's entire lineup if you ask me).
>>18724712The bronze one is cool, I was thinking about getting one for a while but they seem to be permanently sold out everywhere.
>>18724718I think Oris makes a bronze version of their big crown that gives off similar vibes. It's a bit more expensive, but I'm sure it's a better overall watch as well.
Remember the Spinnaker 50 Phantoms?
>>18724723To be honest even though its cool bronze watches are a total gimmick and I'd never spend Oris money on one, otherwise id probably get a bronze black bay if i had that kind of money. The kuoe is about what id be willing to spend. I like small watches too so I think I like it more regardless of price.
>>18724753Fair enough. If I were to get the Oris equivalent I would get their ladies version which is 36mm (sweet spot diameter for me) and around $2k. I'd be comfortable with doing a bronze at that price but more than that I agree about it being a gimmick. The nice thing about the Kuoe is again I can let my son teeth on it and not care if it gets scratched or marked up (which hasn't happened anyways, outside of it slowly developing a patina which was going to happen anyways).
Been daily for about 6 months now, enjoying it.
Besides the GS >>18724785 I’ve been kinda interested in a diver. Love the seaq but I’m kind of a wristlet and a little worried about size. Maybe no date sub instead. The new evo 9 GS diver is kinda cool but I don’t really want only seiko/GS
>>18724804Clearly I know how to based on the second image, I just couldn’t be bothered to fix it in the first one.
>>18724232That rules. I fucking curse you by the way. Chased that nonexistent watch for weeks online, which led me into configuring custom Seikos, Alpinists, and all things green-bezeled. Ended up actually ordering a cool Casio MTD-130D-1A3 from Italy, so also thanks even though I hate you. Oh by the way, you can make that watch real (in a way) by bezel swapping these.
>>18724808The Casio. Comes tomorrow.
>>18724812I like that it reminds me of my favorite modern train, the Cascades Cab Car.
>>18724283>Screenshot_TV RemoteWtf
>>18724787Try the 39mm SeaQ. It fits much better than the 43mm big date version. On the wrist it wears basically like an old 5-digit Sub.
>>18724660good joke anon
I think I'm basically done with mechanical watches. Quartz is thinner, more accurate, easier and cheaper to service (especially because I can change batteries myself).Most importantly, I hate having to constantly re-set a watch every single time I don't wear it for a few days. I've got a couple mechanical pieces that I'll keep for sentimental reasons, but the only watches that I actually wear anymore are my Breitling Aerospace, Omega Seamaster, and Cartier Santos-Dumont.
Is anybody else not a "watch collector"?I just buy what I like and wear it for years. I have 5 watches.
>>18724982What's the difference, in your mind between a collectors and someone who just buys a bunch of watches? Intentionality?
>>18724981i just set 3 of my casio watches to perfect atomic time all at the same time using an app. it was a great feeling. have another casio arriving soon and i'll be able to do all 4 at once.
>>18724986oh and these aren't bluetooth casios. i don't like bluetooth in watches. these are the casios with the multi band 6 feature i like this feature even tho i dont live near any of the radio wave emitting towers an app works fine
>>18724984I don't collect them and store them away or desire to have many watches, I just buy what I like and wear them.
>>18724981So your only option is grand soiko then. Because solar watches not only rival mechanicals in terms of service price but also take longer because you must send them to the manufacturer.
>>18725021Sure, but I don't like any watch GS has ever made. They're generally too thick and too big, their bracelets are hot garbage, their FiNiShInG is overrated, and they just slap design elements on watches that don't need them. (i.e. why do some of their Datejust clones have crown guards?)I will grant that some of their dial textures are nice, but that's about it.The Aerospace is a COSC-certified chronometer which for quartz means accuracy to 10 seconds per year. And it also has an alarm, a chronograph, a countdown timer, a second timezone, and a calendar. It's titanium and has a hundred meters of water resistance while being 10mm thick. No GS has anything like that.
>>18725023Didn't know breitling still makes quartz watches.
>>18725023>The Aerospace is a legendary watchSo naturally, Breitling expanded it out to 45mm across and then cancelled it.Nowadays most pilots wear an Apple Watch but among the watch nerds it's mostly Breitlings and Rolexs. If you see a pilot wearing an Aerospace, the chances are pretty good he previously flew in the military.
>>18725027They still make some ugly chronographs, but when they made more quartz watches, they were great. They were one of the few companies that bothered to get their quartz movements COSC certified.
Celebration time in the garden.
>>18725074>PatelSAAR!
>>18725073murky today!
>>18724967Yeah that seemed like the obvious solution but it didn’t have the exhibition caseback and the movement isn’t as good. I think it’s one of the most beautiful movements so I really would want to be able to see it. The pano date is a cool addition too imo, but you’re right I’m gonna try and seek one out and try it on.
>>18725118>Yeah that seemed like the obvious solution but it didn’t have the exhibition casebackThat was changed last year. They come with a display back now. In fact, if you have an older one, you can send it to GO and they'll swap your solid back out for a display back and put the serial number on the new one.You're right about the movement itself not being as technically interesting as the big panodate movement. Nothing you can do about that, though. For me, the smaller size and thinness was worth it. A power reserve in the 40-50 hour range was considered totally normal just a few years ago.
is this still relevant?
>>18725175Not really. We've kind of moved past the idea of a watch company producing watches exclusively in one luxury tier. Most brands produce a range of products.Take Cartier, for instance. The basic Tank Must is nothing special. It's very pricey for what it is, but in terms of features and finishing, it's closer to being in the entry-level luxury segment. Meanwhile, the stuff in the Prive line and their really special pieces like the Masse Mysterieuse are closer to high-end luxury and even ultra-luxury.Then, on the other hand, you do have companies like Tudor whose entire range is comfortably entry-level luxury or Armin Strom whose entire range is comfortably ultra-luxury.I think the people who like this list are the people who only really look at the brand name and nothing else. They'll buy the cheapest possible Moser or Piaget they can find and declare themselves to now be in the ultra-luxury tier.
>>18725175It's shitOmega and IWC are more luxury than Girard Perregaux.Ressence and Moser are not ultra luxury, they are niche.Grand Seiko should be up a category, he doesn't deserve to be next to Kurono that uses basic Miyota movement.The whole thing is kind of shit. There was a pyramid one that was better.
>>18725175Absolutely not and i've been wanting to make an updated version. Half of the brands under entry level no longer exist, Ming definitely moving up and credor should be in consumer tier.Also i would add another tier, called not a watch, where i would put things like fashion brands and apple.
>>18725200
>>18725210Yeah, I bought a $23 mechanical watch hoping to trick women into thinking it's a Rolex. Ya got me.
>>18725213>getting that offended by an ancient image meme that most just exists to make fun of the way the Chinese sell watchesThin-skinned as fuck. Must be American posting hours.
If your G-Shock has bluetooth, you can use the Casio G-Shock Smart Sync app to sync your Google Calendar with the 'Reminders' feature on your watch.https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.avmedia.gshockGoogleSync/
>>18725164>That was changed last yearOh nice, that's a good change. I'll go to AD soon and try both side by side. I know i'll prefer the size of the smaller one but if I'm going to be spending $8-10k its hard to accept a less interesting/complicated movement.You have one? What color? What else do you have?
>>18725215Who's offended? And it's ALWAYS "American posting hours".B We outnumber everyone else and we actually buy watches. I want this one.>>18725217Aren't you paying attention? We don't want blue teeth. It's hackable.
And there's now a web app that lets you control your G-Shock without even downloading anything onto your phonehttps://gshock.avmedia.org/>>18725223The code is open source, you can see exactly how it workshttps://github.com/izivkov/CasioGShockSmartSync
>>18725221Picrel. I love it. It’s very comfortable and versatile. It runs about a second per day fast. Normally I wear it on a rubber strap but the bracelet is one of the best in the industry. I just don’t really like bracelets in the summer.
>>18725223>Who's offended?You, very clearly.
>>18725235Well, if anyone's an authority on wasting money, it's you, so I'll defer to your experience-based expertise.
>>18724808
>>18725244Oh I love what Baltany’s doing, and have a few of theirs in mind actually. But they don’t do that one in a green bezel.
>>18725244Hamilton is a huge waste of money ineed but you're smoking crack if you think Baltic are built 95% as well lmao.
>>18725252
>>18725263I think Baltic also is a waste of money.I don’t know what you think those overpriced brands are giving you besides a slightly better movement sometimes.They’ve done lots of comparison reviews and they aren’t significantly better made at all.
>>18725231very nice anon. I also love dive watches on nato/straps. I'll spend some more time with both sizes. If I cant get the no date sub by end of year maybe I go seaq.
>>18725303Good call. I’m wearing mine right now. Hang in there.
>>18725274There are like 4 main movements what the fuck are we even talking about. This is why watches are boring and stupid. You get a eta 2800 series or a sw200 series or a miyota 9000 series for 4hz. And you get a nh30 series for 3hz and SOMETIMES a yn50 series. You want long power reserve? You get an eta2800 modded and called a c07 or you get a seiko 6r. You getting a chronograph? You get a seiko vr, sometimes a seagull. Otherwise you'll be getting an eta775X. The only special in house ones will be at the top with zennith or omega or rolex. Watches are fucking boring. Just pick your style, 4hz vs 3hz, and power reserve. They're almost all just steel with sapphire and you get a different faceplate on the front like an xbox 360. You can get titanium or brass. Then we're done you've learned what everything is and everything is the same so just pick your faceplate. Literally all of them are extremely overpriced except for chinkwatches
>>18725292>If I cant get the no date sub by end of year maybe I go seaq.Having formerly owned a 114060, the SeaQ is a cut above in terms of finishing and feel. Now, if I could get a really minty 14060M, I might be tempted to make the swap but it would have to be a truly great example.
>>18725310Which is why I love those beautiful chinkers. I'll buy a Swiss or Japanese when they're on deep discount too though. I just can't drop thousands on ONE watch because they pay some actor or sporting competitor to wear it in photos. Makes me feel stupid.
>>18725311>Having formerly owned a 114060, the SeaQ is a cut aboveI believe it but the no date sub is just too cool. I also love the 5 digits and would grab one if they weren't more expensive than a new one lol.
>>18725321I mean, get the 5-digit models while you can. They're only going to get more expensive as the 4-digit models move further upmarket. It wasn't that long ago that you could get a decent 5513 for like 5 grand but no one wanted them because they were just old beaters. Only the special and rare models were collectible. Now a junk 5513 is going to be around 9 grand.
>>18725074>not cuban
>>18724296How hairy is your butthole?
First time wearing in a couple years
>>18725175>the higher up the tiers you go into more and more 'luxury' the more of a cuck you have to be in the buying process to acquire the 'timepiece' top kek
over 200k usd in this piclook at the finishes and then imagine the feel of these luxury watches
>>18725522doesn't this make you want to buy luxury watches? wow just incredible!so high end! i mean, look at that image!wow!LUXURY!incredible!
yoooooooooo my fellow luxury watchfags have a look at what this fellow luxury watch enthusiast collector GOT when he walked into ROLEXcheck it out!!!!!!!! AMAZING! WOW!!!!!this is what the AD gave him to 'clean it up' after he was 'done' "nurturing the relationship" The AD said "the finishing and the feel are great"hahahahahahaHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHA xxxDDDDDDDDDDDDD
>>18725521>>18725522>>18725524>>18725525(You)Get a life, little buddy.
>>18725528awwwww ;(
Currently wearing a Rolex
>>18725544thank you for admitting you're wearing the International Symbol that a man can fuck your wife and you'll support him in that endeavour.
What's a good quality and light weight cloth strap? I need something that lets my wrist breathe.
throwing a canvas strap on this fucker when it arrives and calling it a day on watch purchases for a while. don't really need anything else
>>18725552raw brutal perfection.
