new balance BB950 "silver moss" editionold: >>18683939
sneakers are played out. i stopped wearing them. lol the whole resell market crashed right after that jewish nike exec got caught backdooring sneakers to her reseller son. sneakers never had any hype it was money laundering.
>>18731204So what will you wear now? Loafers? Redwings?
>>18731231mocs, loafers, oxfords, sandals, whatever. not into boots off the jobsite. not into derbies. only sneakers left are a pair of converse to work out in and my running shoes (for running, not fashion)
>>18731234>loafers>mocsyou are worried about sneakers being played out but you are wearing these in the big two six? kek
>>18731237i've had them in rotation longer than some zoomers have been alive. trends come and go but a real shoe is timeless.
what shoes to complete this fit /fa/ggos? thanks frens
>>18731252the checks are blue/red on a white shirt btw
>>18731237yeah if you're an unc then you shouldn't have been wearing sneakers in the first place
>>18731272i probably look younger than you. most of you aged like shit.
>>18731252idk but this doesn't look good
Why so much hate for Air Jordans? I have mid-rise a pair in solid white.
>>18731280Manchild unc cope. If you don't look like a 16 year old high schooler, you have no business wearing sneakers.
What you do if yo homie come round your place wearing these?
>>18731387Fuck him right in his Big Black Bussy.
>>18731389Based
>>18731280as a millennial who is proud of how young he looks, even I'm starting to realize how cringe it is to latch on to this fact, after a certain point it just feels sorta pathetic. also the 'zoomers are aging quickly!' shit is just a fox news tier fud you ate up because you need it to be true.you look young because you are a shut-in who spent his childhood indoors, not because your genes are superior.
Why are 530s so poor quality? Are they supposed to be cool exactly because they suck in being proper shoes?
hi just me trying to sell my crusty nearly 50-year old cracked-leather sneakers (they're vintage)
>>18731294why not?
>>18731545different guy but it looks 90% casual up until the rolled cuffs which broadcast to everyone that you're a tryhard.
>>18731252That's not how you roll your sleeves. And you don't go above your elbows. If you're going to go that high then may as well wear a proper half sleeve button up shirt. And lose those ugly shoes. Wear something less chunky, like white low top converses or vans, or minimalist leather sneakers.
>>18731550Nothing wrong with rolled sleeves, just do them properly
>>18731580No one cares about how you roll your sleeverinos, fag. Stopped reading after the first sentence.
>>18731550>90% casual up until the rolled cuffswhats the other 10%? athletic bc of shoes? its 100 degrees here so it'd look silly wearing long sleeves>>18731580>don't go above your elbowsnoted, thanks. i am losing the shoes, i have some minimalist white canvas barefoot shoes arriving tomorrow. i wish they made more sneakers in wide, i like the NB ones in OP. are the shorts color ok, i have some khaki and navy but i think it looks a little too formal.
>>18731252Old Navy flip flops
>>18731201Are there mass produced or similarly priced (I don't want fancy pantsy shoes for trashing) sneakers that have leather lining? Stan smith has leather lining I think but that's about it everything else just says "textile". Quince also has them and Clarks are they any good?Bonus points if they are flat/zero dropMore bonus points if the sole is not just glued>>18731605should I get these in leather?
>>18731580>That's not how you roll your sleeves. And you don't go above your elbowsobsessing over sleeve rules is so insanely gay.
When you find out how much these meme shits actually suck quality-wise, they kinda lose all the attractiveness.
>>18731415>millenial>watching faux newslol.nah its just observable reality. i look better than you. that's why you're an incel and i'm not. keep striving, keep working hard so the ceo can buy a third yacht. ill get the zoomettes stretched out for you.
>>18731630You don't roll like that because it looks ugly and amateurish, like you're not used to wearing buttoned shirts or rolling their sleeves. And you don't go above the elbows because it's uncomfortable, because all that bunched up fabric is restrictive when bending your forearm. It also makes your upper arms way too hot (from all that excess fabric), which defeats the purpose of rolling your sleeves.
>>18731234its okay to be gay
No one cares, nigga.No one cares.
>>18731650you can go above the elbow up to the shoulder if the sleeves are cut wide and the fabric isn't too thick. your thing about fabric bunching is only true of some shirts. you're right though, the in between area looks bad. cuff below the elbow, or all the way up to the shoulder if the shirt allows. the in between area looks bad usually. if you wanna have your sleeve there do a roll not a cuff.
I've been buying these for 15 years now. Is it time to move on ?
>>18731813woops forgot pic
>>18731813>>18731814
>>18731639This looks like the nerd with the oversized Velcro binder who wore those oval-shaped glasses and a Halo 2 tee. May as well have a rolling backpack while you’re at it.
>>18731813Yes move on
>>18731234I like converse. I have a pair in red. They go well with white chinos or black sweat pants.
>>18732425nta but I will neverI have enough pairs stashed I can wear them until I dieVans Authentics are going with me to the graveNOTHING anyone will EVER say will EVER get me to give them up
What's a sub 120$ sneaker for daily wear that is not:>Chunky y2k new balance>adidas samba & co.>jordans>canvas slippers (vans, converse)
>>18731252Birken Boston
