Why did women stop wearing them?
cause they are all fat now and need the high waisted mom jeans to cover their fat fucking stomachs
>>18735676Tbh it's not easy for a girl pull off a low waisted pair even if she's thin
>>18735796Low rise are degenerate and masculine. They make women's hips look shorter and like they have no ass, which is a masculine trait. And they make men look retarded and disproportionate by making it look like they have no hips and only legs and torso.Nobody wins with low rise, except literal faggots who pushed low rise onto normies in the early 2000s because they're exhibitionist perverts who get off to the idea of your pants looking like they're dropping down.
They're too fat now, and they have so many god awful regret tattoos it would look bad
Zoomers are too fat for those know and of styles.
>>18735809You are fat. Stop being fat is just embarrassing and degenerate.
>>18735673Low-cut tight jeans are transphobic, because pre-op trans-women can't hide their budges easily when they wear them. Modern fits are more inclusive and less bigoted.
>>18736118I unironically like the tomboy mall goth look on girls. Trannies are gross, though.
>>18735889Unfortunately for you, I'm probably one of the skinniest guys on this board. Which is why I don't feel the need to cope by wearing low rise. I look thin in anything I wear. Only fatties still wear low rise, because it allows them to wear pants with smaller waist size below their potbellies and pretend they aren't fat.
>>18735673They became fatphobic.
>>18736334What are your stats and how do pants/jeans sit? Do you need a belt? My jeans naturally rest on my hips as I walk. I've been losing weight and have been wondering how will they hang if they have nothing to hold them in place
>>18735673Aren't all jeans low-cut by definition ?
>>18736334You don't look skinny in oversized clothing you just look like a junkie. This whole highwaited trend is just a cope for fat people. Only skinny people can wear low waisted jeans.
>>18736334damn bro is PACKING man DAMN
>>18736582You are fat.
>>18735676>>18735816>>18735887>>18736336t. zoomers who weren't alive to remember the ubiquity of muffin tops.News flash, Americans were fucking fat 20 years ago. They still wore low rise jeans anyway, so that has nothing to do with it.
>>18736421Umm, no? Who said jeans are low cut by default? Most jeans are mid rise. Originally they were high rise just like regular trousers.
>>18736118literally everything that’s on trend rn is to advance the trans agenda
>>18736908Just to point out that the zoomers saying stuff like this have only old photos of celebrities as their reference points and not actually experience with everyday people wearing this style. Fat chicks in low rise jeans were so common you'll find old blog posts from the 2000's still around talking about them. Here's some boomers blog post from 08'https://blogbydonna.com/muffin-tops-are-to-eat-not-wear/
>>18736929Those make them look fat. I will never understand the autistic obsession with heritage jeans
>>18737082No they don't, retard. Your pants don't need to fit like leggings for your legs to not look fat. That's a fatty (and soilennial) mindset. Which is why fat millennials still wear skinny jeans because they think they are "slimming".And those aren't "heritage" jeans. Those are just normal straight leg jeans. That's what jeans always looked like until the early 2010s when soilennials started wearing women's skinny jeans to larp as emo faggots.
>>18737094Who said anything about leggings? They can fit like James Dean or cowboy jeans instead of this diaper shit
>>18737094I look like this
>>18735673Only izzy can pull it off
>>18735673They all got fucking fat.
>>18737475she cutie
>>18736951There is an episode of curb your enthusiasm about this lol
>>18737573>its just like my heckin movierinos
>>18736908True, burgers were fat 20 years ago but that same percentage is now obese.Cuddly muffin tops are one thing, disgusting rolls of landwhale blubber spilling everywhere are something else.
>>18735673styles change. they're slowly coming back in, but i would guess sometime in the 2030s they will be popular again.
>>18735673this doesn't even look good on her, much less the average fatty.
>>18737723this is massive cope and homosexually anti-navalist
>>18737128Your fatfuck insecurity is showing, fatty. Jeans can fit like anything and they will not make you look fat as long as you're not actually fat yourself. Do retards like you even understand how to tell if someone's fat or not? As long as your shoulders and chest are wider than your waist and you have a flat belly, as a man you will never look fat even if you wear loose pants. Stupid fucking shut in NEETs. Go outside, touch grass and look at how clothes fit on actual people, instead of just staring at flat photos and videos on a screen.
>>18736908Yeah, you don't get it, do you? Only hot people could wear low rise jeans; if you were a fat ass, you could never wear them. That's basically the point of them; it created a filter. We are going to have a bunch of dysgenic fat freaks in the future because now fashion is catering to fat garbage genes.
>>18737996These men look like they have a big fat lower half. The denim being heavy and rigid exaggerates the effect. If you want to dress in diapers be my guest, copefag
