[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Coudl Zara (with it's sub-brands) considered the Apple of fashion?
>it just works
>not the best, not the worse
>stores always populated
>wannabe rich people always buying in it
>stores always full
>>
no, you idiot
>>
>>18740980
> >wannabe rich people always buying in it

They make decent trousers. No one buys them to intentionally signal wealth though like theyre LV or something
>>
i like the zara because they sell goofy stuff
>>
Zara is the Daniel Wellington of fashion
>>
>>18740987
Why not?
Their stores look-alike lmao
>>
American take. Zara is super cheap and poor people tier in eu. I did buy a bunch of their shit the last couple of years so saying this without bias.
>>
>>18741024
did op say it wasn't
>>
>>18741011
one is a cheap clothing store owned by a large international conglomerate, the other is large enough to influence congress
>>
>>18741057
Well, I can tell you they DO have enough influence in Spain.
>>
>>18740980
polo ralph lauren is more alight with what you described.
>>18741010
this guy get it
>>
the status Zara has in the USA never ceases to amaze me
>>
>>18740980
Zara quality is shit tier
>>
Imo zara has become a bit better in the past few years. I know everyone likes to shit on it since they steal shamelessly from runways and have poor construction/materials, but I've been finding more good needles in the haystack of shit: interesting materials, cool cuts, passable construction.
>>
>>18741197
Zara has got worse on average I feel. But they still aren't fully garbage and yes a lot of things are just fine. I hadn't bought for like 20 years but I started buying a few things last year, now I have like 8 pairs of jeans (Italian denim and made there), few pairs of shorts, 3 shirts and 3 coats. All these are pretty great for the price, but I walk to their store often and I see how bad some other things are in terms of looking and feeling sloppy.
The things I bought 20+ years ago have held up amazingly, but like half of it was made in Portugal and higher quality back then.
>>
>>18741201
10 years ago they were completely dogshit, you couldn't find anything decent, they've course corrected a bit it seems. They left the complete dogshit to their teen brands like bershka/pull&bear.
>>
>>18741197
I see it too. They went full retard for the SS 2026?, releasing dozens of leather jackets, some of which are quite good surprisingly (some are rubbish, especially those made of pigskin). Designs and fabrics kinda getting better last few years yet still over 80% is recycled plastic waste

>>18741216
Yep, cheaper Inditex is a dumpster
>>
>>18741024
>Zara is super cheap and poor people tier in eu.
It also is in America.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.