The great debate
Too narrow.I'm an athletic man who's 6' 2", ~215lbs and my feet are generally ~13 with extremely high arches and a wide toe spread. I run without heel-strike.I prefer Birkenstocks.
both belong into the trash
I like the cute little lacoste alligator.
>>18747519>>18747522stop buying plastic junk
>>18747576I buy running shoes every-other-year.I haven't purchased other shoes in a decade.How often are YOU "buying" shoes, bro?
>>18747580neither of those are running shoesare you saying you use running shoes casually?
>>18747522>my feet are generally ~13 with extremely high arches and a wide toe spread.post them (no homo)
>>18747519Get triple black leather 90s AirMax instead
>>18747522are these comfy? having a hard time switching to clean white sneakers after wearing running shoes for 100 years? any recommendations?
>>18748098Forewarning: the Birkenstock footbed is specifically designed for high arches. Sandals, shoes, boots.I can point to my Birkenstocks as the most comfortable sandals, and shoes, that I have ever worn (for walking). And don't bother forcing yourself to wear "white clean" colorbeds; they'll just get dirty. All sorts of colors exist from every sneaker brand on planet Earth.They go on sale pretty frequently, I certainly reccomend giving them a try. The "Arizona" sandals (stereotypical) sandals, if nothing else.Also, I wear "running" sneakers for casual, too. Nike doesn't sell "Run Avant" anymore (they haven't for, like, 20 years), I loved those as a teen. I replaced them with New Balance 574 (576 just means they were made in Great Britain).
>>18747519"great debate"No it isn't. You will stop using that term.
The debate was always Common Projects and then the best knock off.
>>18747651no thanks I don't wait tables
>>18748177They were lame when you guys were hyping them up and they're super lame now. Get Stan Smiths if you want pure white sneakers, they're legit cool.
>>18747522>suede leatherIs that even real leather or leather looking plastic?
>>18748170>made by jamboys
