Why do all women love this style on men and yet most men don't bother dressing this way?
>>18756910Cuz its 2formal
>>18756910When women say they love this style on a man, they mean they like attractive men to wear this style, not that this style makes men look attractive. If an average guy tried this he'd end up getting memed on as a pathetic try-hard fedora wearing milady type. It would be positively dangerous for a guy who wasn't already male model standard to try this kind of fit.
>>18756910I don't care what style women love. I dress how I like
>>18756910Am i the only one who get second hand cringe looking at K-Pop?How is this even a thing?The one on the left legit looks like a downer. If he was white, he'd get tested, be we are lenient with asians.
>>18757058because its based on what a 50 year old gay guy thinks a 13 year old girl would like in a man. The make up, the hyper autistic costumes, the male stripper dance moves
>>18757062Yeah, it's probably based on gay korean producers tastes.It doesn't exude sexuality or masculinity, nor normal romantic attraction, just porcelain dolls doing weird moves. It's very dysgenic, like the society it's from.Koreans don't fuck, they don't make babies.They never go and fuck women. That little brown cut little asian dick always stay inside those suit pants.
>>18756910They look cute and surely contribute to the birthrate drop.
>>18756910Because cheap suits are unpleasent to wear and good suits aren't in the price range of the average dude
>>18757140Small store near me sells American and Italian suits and clothes. Nothing else. Every piece (including shoes since they are all bespoke) the owner has in inventory requires ordering months in advance and once it's gone, it's gone. Baseline price for a pair of pants, shoes, a shirt, tie, and jacket is $4,000. Mind you, this is a tiny hole in the wall in a city you've never heard of, but he gets enough business to stay open with regular customers. I am thinking of buying a jacket off him, but the cheapest he has is a grand. Everything has to be tailored after the fact, so it's not off the rack stuff. Interesting to see the difference between an unfinished suit that will be tailored to fit and something you can just grab off a rack.
>>18757055tpbp
Why does the trooned wog spam this?
>>18756910Because that would cause men to die of heatstroke for 8 out of 12 months
>>18756910>synchronized dance movesThat's so fucking queer. WTF are you watching that and posting it for, OP??
>>18756910asians are so fucking gay.
>>18756984spbp
>>18756910Because it doesn't reflect their lifestyle/jobBy the time you are 26, you really should be dressing in a way that reflects your profession somewhat. Basically what you wear on a daily basis to work then your casual wear should have elements of those pieces.Eg a trades person will basically be in jeans and tee on his day off, maybe elements of older (lifestyle) workwear incorporated.White collar people same thing but maybe a more business casual elements blended in.Nothing more goofier and un/fa/ than dressing in a way that doesn't reflect your lifestyle
>>18757237This is fucking retarded. Do you think every man in America from the 20's to the 40's were white collar bankers?
>>18757248That's because show they dressed back then was the mainstream fashion. Remember, back then even people doing physical activity like sports basically dressed like pic related which is borderline formal by today's standardsDressing in a suit like in the OP isn't mainstream or the norm, especially for people in their 20s or 30s and just comes off as goofy unless you come from a certain lifestyle
>>18757252Your argument is still fundamentally retarded because you're associating clothing with status, and firm boundaries that people shouldn't cross because it otherwise might embarrass their "betters". Explain coherently why a guy who is a plumber should dress in stereotypical garb that you associate with that profession. Mind you, I am not speaking of what they wear on the job, I am speaking entirely of what they wear off the clock. Explain your reasoning without invoking some retarded form of caste or classicism but I am going to wager that you can't do it because you're brown and this concept has been beaten into you your entire life. I say this as a statement of fact as otherwise you have no framework that you can hope to hang an argument from.
>>18757256Because style/fashion looks the best when it's at its most authentic and that often relates to the lifestyle you live. At the end of the day you need to factor in context and environment whether you like it or not.It's no different to wearing heavy winter coats and nice jackets just because it looks good in the catalogue or pictures despite living in a tropical country on a typical hot day. Wearing a nice autumn/winter outfit on a hot tropical day just because you think it's /fa/ is just stupid as hell and makes it un/fa/ no matter how good it looksSuits as off the clock casual wear isn't the norm or mainstream for anyone in this day and age regardless if you are white collar or blue collar. That's why I said even white collar people wouldn't even be wearing suits on their days off, generally just a more business casual version of tee and jeans, if that. Even most offices these days are easing up on suit requirement and only require them on certain meeting and days.But by all means, go ahead and wear a suit on a random saturday or sunday (where it's obvious you aren't just coming from work) and go about your day doing grocery shopping, going to the mall, the cinema, visit EB games and convince yourself you are looking flash doing that.
>>18757069>ai slop>dude looks like a monkeyPost something realistic:https://youtu.be/me-CgOhQ9ow?si=zPs4JrR4J4EKExoV
>>18757248don't bother replying to him that's either a fedora wearing retard or a jeet
>>18757268lmao
>>18757268Looking like a primal ape is superior to the modern domesticated weakboi
>>18757283you jerking your tiny asian noodle to that?
>>18757179Don't be jealous because you could never, faggot.
>>18757268How vain and conceited do you have be to do that?
>>18757283this unironically looks like hell on earth. how do normies even enjoy this
>>18757411The women are there for attention. And the dudes are there for the women. That's pretty much it.
>>18757413And to add, if you don't really care about getting either of those then yeah there's really no reason to be there. Also dancing is jester
>>18757259Not that anon, but you're overthinking what makes a fit authentic or not. Realistically once you wear something enough times it becomes authentic. If you wear suits or tailored menswear enough it just becomes clothes, thus natural. Obviously trying to look like a business man from the office 10-15 years ago will end up as weird because of the on the clock connotations, but borrowing looks from the distant past when menswear was just what men wore, you can certainly get away with a lot.
>>18757058Boyband trend of the 90s/00s + hyper extreme perfect looks and a multi billion media campaign that promotes parasocial attachment to the boybands that prevents them from having any public life that stops fans from being able to self insert as their gf or pretend they are gay with eachother. There’s loads of fake ass content where they ‘share’ their lives with fans so they feel emotionally close to them and believe they’re safe lovely untouchable boys that belong personally to the fans. If you’re not susceptible to idol culture like the female idols that are aimed at the same way as a fake gf at male fans then it just comes off as cringe and fake.
Women 1000% don't like men dressed this way.
>>18757411>how do normies even enjoy thisI guess you do not notice the alcoholic beverages in their hands. The older I get the more I realize that alcohol really has held back our entire species for millenia.
>>18756984No, chuddie. Stop making excuses for dressing like a piece of shit. Women will like and respect any man much more if he dress in a suit. Wearing a suit will show that you respect yourself enough to appear presentable and have enough discipline to wear and maintain formal clothes.
>>18757884My grandfather used to say that a man is not properly dressed without a hat, I am posting this while wearing camouflage cargo pants and a graphic t-shirt.
>>18757062>because its based on what a 50 year old gay guy thinks a 13 year old girl would like in a man. The make up, the hyper autistic costumes, the male stripper dance movesHoly shit... you absolutely nailed it. When you know, you know
>>18757792If he didn’t have wide shoulders he’d be a tranny suicide
>>18756984Just don't be morbidly obese (you can be Bluto) and you can quite literally wear a blazer and slacks any day of the week, any time of day you'll be better dressed than 99% of men without even trying. The rest is just normal shit. Wash your face, clean up your hair (if you got it), polish your shoes, throw on a matching shirt, and pair it with a few accessories. Congratulations, women will now look at you. Just don't be sperg and overdo it. Do you look like Reviewbrah or that Kirby faggot? You've gone too far, turn around. Just strike a balance between casual but clear effort. It makes you look approachable without the other party having to looksmatch you. People think women don't compute this shit for some reason. A girl in a graphic tee and torn jeans isn't going to approach a guy in a suit. She's consciously aware of the fact that she will look weird, and in all likelihood even if you have a shit face card are out of her league in some way. Whether or not that's true is another matter, but she'll think it because someone wearing a five figure suit has money, and a job to afford it and all the rest of the accoutrements of your fit. Do you have a good haircut? That's money. Do you have a well groomed beard? That's money. Do you have nice nails? That's money. Do you have on a "fancy looking" watch? That's money. Do you have on dress shoes or good loafers? That's money. Each time you do this, you're pushing that "cute barista" tier woman further out of your zone. You can still do all the above but with a sport coat and designer jeans, and now you're even more casual but still social signalling that you have your shit together. A chick who can't match that vibe is going to instantly think, "Is my hair fucked? Did I put on enough makeup? Did I put on too much? Is my outfit too casual? Is my apartment a wreck? What if he asks me what I do? Is he going to see me get into my 2009 Toyota Camry? Is there one of those black, rubber marriage rings on his hand?"
>>18758161why are you making less women available to youthe richer a woman the worse her personality is
>>18758165Women social signalling is different. It's harder to pick up on, which is why you should push for a level of casualness in terms of approachability, but still indicate having your shit together. Otherwise you have to rely entirely on face and body. That's one of the major kicks to the head with the casualness of clothing. The more casual it's become, the more women have had to rely on the only things we can quickly show them to distinguish from other men: face and body. Women, even casually, still have lots of tools they use (unless they are absolute dogs) to keep a very casual look but not look like total shit. Normalizing wearing shapewear for the gym is one of their biggest cheat codes in recent years because it saves them a ton of time, effort, and money. Meanwhile we still have to put in a bunch of effort at the gym and pray our face isn't shit. You can regulate this imbalance by portraying effort in other ways. A dress shirt and slacks just makes you look like a nerd. A white sport coat, a warm colored shirt, and jeans with loafers? Now you're fun but still have your shit on. Finally, while it can grant you those dumb bimbos you are thinking of, you can still just not give them the time of day, man. No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you that you need to talk to that chick in the cheap Gucci with the mid LV bag, and the bug eyed sunglasses. I think a big part that young guys don't take into account is "don't scare her". I don't mean "don't scare the hoes", I mean keeping her relaxed by mirroring her body language and show you have the ability to hold a conversation. If you can do that, you can talk to women. I am only throwing this information out there for all my bros who weren't gifted with "hunter eyes" and cheek bones you can cut marble on. This is how you start hitting outside of your perceived league. Being funny also helps, a lot, but that takes spontaneity. I'm no good at lover boy, pick up lines, etc I do other stuff.
>>18756910Suit style will either make you look like a movie star or like a little kid going to church with his parents. The main difference is fit, and to get that perfect fit, you need to get it custom, which is quite expensive and relatively high-maintenance.
>>18758529It's expensive because next to no one wears suits anymore. if more people wore suits, then there would be more tailors around to profit from it, and the tailoring rates will fall because they won't need to rely on a handful of customers to make ends meet. Supply and demand.
>>18758161Reviewbrah's suits are just too big. He'd look good in them if they fit him. Well, and if he worked out
>>18758553His hairstyle is also a problem. It's far too old man.
>>18758552The other problem is the material. It'd take years (if ever) to get wool in the quantity and quality that it used to be available.
>>18756910it's fucking annoying to have to buy the pinpoint perfect item OR have to go to some tailor or vietnamese woman to make it fit perfectlyI cba honestlyalso>dressing for womenI used to dress like this but I got annoyed as fuck and it's barely worth italso if you have the misfortune to gain 5kg or drop 5kg you have to go see the vietnamese woman again to redo your itemsfuck this shit ong fr nocap
>>18758553I think this is one of the most valid critique of reviewbrahs style- his frame is too small for the 80's and 90's style suits he picks which generally have very padded yet loose silhouettes and the double breasted suits really accentuate that problem. And this personally comes from someone who loves drape cuts and is not a huge fan of skinny fit- but personally I think he would be better off with leaning more into the mod look of the 50's and 60's as the silhouettes were much slimmer, or if he really doesn't want to lose his style, look more toward 30s era since the late 80s and 90s were heavily influenced versions of that (the ridiculous shoulder padding was not something from that era, natural and lightly padded were).>>18758608Wearing suits is beyond old man now, I don't think that factors into his fashion.
>>18758887I mean the pomade hair look he has is very gay. It's terrible.
>>18758161>Is he going to see me get into my 2009 Toyota Camry?Based
>>18756910No poltard this won't get men to wear suits everyday either.
>>18757248Every man who wasnt a coal miner or something was de facto required to wear a suit and tie for work regardless of if they were lawyers or truck drivers. There's no reason to be so ignorant of history in the age of information
>>18759118Yeah we get it, you're ugly as fuck.
>>18756910
>>18756910Any straight east asian male porn actors i can follow
