Last thread was alright $500 and under. Vintage, Chinese, Japanese, Italian, microbrand, budget Swiss, whatever you’ve got or want. No judgement. Post your coffee, discuss your house, anything goes.
>>18763481Those retarded watches are not affordable or inexpensive. >Credor bros we're losing so hard!
I'm considering grabbing one of those $99 bullhead chronos for a Christmas gift. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4ubu5qD9tI
I have a Duxot and a Cadola and they're good brands.
>>18764143those sports watches look pretty good, but I dislike exposed screws on the bezel. it's a trend that can't die soon enough, imo.
>>18764428I guess I just tuned those screws out. I like that they're 37mm and have a date at the 6. And that they're $130. But I have a couple watches like that already. I don't have a bullhead but I don't know if I'd want one so big. Then again they might all be big.
Is this thread ready to accept the $9 Biden field watch?
>>18764457That's a little too cheap for a real watch I'm going to wear. But that's been posted extensively recently and we don't need to start it up again here. I'm sure they're fine.
>>18764457Bought a Lenqin just for shits and giggles. It's alright I guess but it loses about a minute per month despite being a quartz watch and the seconds hand never stops at the indices. It's also loud as fuck, I can hear it ticking from across the room
Glycine needs to release 40mm quartz Combat Sub GMTs
took my steeldive '72 to the beach for the first time today, was fun :)
>>18765973If it was 40mm then you could argue that it's worth getting over the militado murph or the escapement time one but no, this one is more than twice the price of those two for no reason >bbbbut automatic! It's a PT movement, the most bottom of the barrel stuff out there
Why you would wear watch for less than $5k? Why you are poor? Buy under pants lol.
>>18766184Absolutely no one considers the PT5000 bottom of the barrel. And why would anyone want a 40mm Murph when 38mm is the perfect size?This one is at a better price and the brand looks better than the logo on the SH. What would your issue be with this one?
>>18764457My cheapest watch is a tree fiddy Skmei, while I also have other models slightly just above that price range.
>>18766234As in $3.50? I don't think Skmei makes anything for $350.00.
Circa 2000?
>>18766121Nice. I am almost thinking of buying this same watch, I am eyeing the 70w version though. The size is a tiny bit more reasonable and it doesn't have the cyclops which I despise.Did you order it from Ali or the Steeldive site? The latter has much better pricing for me but I worry about customer service if something goes wrong.
Again they are shattering my dreams. Most money I ever dropped on a watch and they can't get it for me. WTF
>>18768710HAHAHA ROLLIE RIPOFFFFFFFFF
>>18768742Rollie?What does this mean?
Thinking about changing the bracelet. Maybe mesh or something. What do you guys think would look good
>>18768752Rolex
>>18768840Rolex ripoff? A Bulova? No.Also, Rolexes are not applicable to this thread as they cost over $500.
>>18768846>Rolex ripoff? A Bulova? No.https://www.chrono24.com/bulova/ref-bulovasuperseville.htm???
>>18768850That's nothing like the watch in question.
>>18768710looks like shit, as per ususal shitercel. you have whatever the opposite of a discerning eye is. how is your weekend bender going? have you ruined anymore steaks?
>>18768838well, since the dial and bezel have gold accents, what about a two-tone?
>>18768838I like that purple color. do they make one like an OP?
Does anyone know another brand that makes a Willard with a plain steel bezel? The printed logo here looks ugly as fuck, they offer a logoless version but it just feels like I am ashamed of what I am wearing if I go with that. If it wasn't for that shitty lettering the watch would be fine, the symbol itself isn't even bad.
>>18769901OVEN FRESH PUNJABI STYLECHAL HATT ROLEX AB TANDOORI AAYA!
Casio Beside Tank homage
>>18769901Don't you find those to be too big?
>>18771366why the hell did they name it "beside"? what the hell kind of name is that? like: " it's not the best watch, but it's beside it, which is just as good, right fellas? "
>>18772630not him, but the proportions on Tandorio are always super awkward. case, dial, they never match up right.
>>18772715Not just Tandorio. All Willards. Tandorio pretty much copies other brands.
>>18772714It's some old sub-brand that Casio revived as their line of affordable dress watches. The new stuff they're putting out under it all have sapphire glass. Why that name at all is a mystery.
>>18771366Homage of what? It's a Casio. What's the price?
too big for my wrist?
>>18772727Pricing is TBA
>>18772718>Tandorio pretty much copies other brandsyes, but poorly, from everything I've seen. their proportions seem worse than usual, I think because they just buy everything off the shelf and kludge it together rather than having anything made to any unified specifications
>>18772730eh, you should probably shoot for smaller, but I wouldn't worry about it too much. a black dial with that thin case/bezel wears pretty small.
>>18772733sheesh this is already 37mm, so maybe 34? I agree this a 9 or 10mm case thickness , it's really what makes it wearable
>>18772734wow, your wrists are even smaller than mine. I wouldn't agonize over it, if that's already 37 then what're you gonna do, right? although, some male/unisex models do come in women's sizes, which is a good cheat especially if the "male" version is 40+
>>18772736yep 6" on the nose basically , maybe 5.9 if precisely measured.
>>18772730It's close. Is it 39mm? 36mm? I'm pretty sure I have that watch in green (I never wear my Bernies) but I don't remember the size. Does it look that big in the mirror? Sometimes close photos make it look bigger than it appears IRL.As long as you're happy, but the lugs should not extend the width of the wrist. You have like a quarter inch clearance by the looks of it. Pushing it.
Oh, I should have read down. 37mm? Yeah, 34mm would look better on you. I like wearing small watches.Get yourself something like this.
>>18772743damn not bad which timex is that?
>>18768710>he gave the jomajews his money for a watch without papersDon't be this guy, anons.
>>18772755It would have had papers. I got refunded.
>>18772748Hand wind from 1977. Comes in red, blue, and green too.
>>18772758genuinely can't find it in north america (canada) with the exact same dial/numeral style as yours - genuinely rare
>>18772760Just keep your eyes peeled for them on eBay. I see them now and then. A saw a bunch of them a few months ago.
>>18772730with a wrist like this do I have any strong options for stainless steel banded watch or diver ish dials like a HydroConquest - or am I essentially just cooked outta that market cause biology?
