[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fa/ - Fashion

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_3112.jpg (60 KB, 416x738)
60 KB JPG
Which is the better brand?
Ben Davis
>Limited availability
>similar style pants to Dickies but thicker/better material
>pockets are weirdly shallow, phone will stick out (idk if it’s because they keep the “retro” styling but it does kinda suck.
>limited style choices you either like them or you don’t
Carhartt
>Anything with “flex” kind of sucks and is cheap.
>past couple of years the prices have increased and the quantity has decreased on most items. It’s kind of the Levi situation where their old jeans were cheap and good vs the new jeans are garbage and expensive
>Carhartt’s duck pants are superior to everyone else’s
>twill/canvas pants are nice and like them. I wouldn’t call them 1 for 1 vs dickies since the styling is different enough
>Good Denim, and I prefer it over the Dickies denim pants
>Overall it’s just depends, they are constructed superior and have better materials but other brands offer a slightly inferior product but for less money.
Dickies
>cheap but somewhat decent for the price if you don’t get anything with “FLEX” in it
>have of course the classic Dickies styles like the iconic pants, double knee pants, shorts and work shirts
>also have knock off Carhartt stuff, they even have a knock off Detroit Jacket
>Quality can vary and I’ve bought two of the same style pants but in different colors and both fit different but they were 35$ which is half the price of everyone else
>Dickies 1/4 zip shirt is better than the Ben Davis 1/2 zip, the only thing that blows is the lack of unique colors
>Pro Series anything is pretty good and worth the price difference (there usually 10$ more)
Dark horse candidate…Milwaukee
>Fairly cheap
>really like the work pants (bought them for like 40$ but they went up in price recently)
>actually like their flannels
>T-shirts are nice
>since they’re sold at Home Depot they only have a couple of colors.

What’s your thoughts /fa/
>>
>>18765575
Dickies all the way. Carhartt is for the same type of people that are just LARPing as masculine males. They’re just modern versions of the Americana style hipster years ago that wore Redwing Iron Rangers and bought Iron Heart jeans.
>>
>>18765607
I'm an actual trade guy, a machinist and work alongside a bunch of welders and some maintenance guys/mechanics. Everybody wears Carhartt. I don't know where this idea that Carhartt is only for hipsters these days came from, yeah some of them wear it but it's mostly the "WIP" fashion line that's a whole separate thing from the actual workwear.

It's also really hard to beat for the money. Dickies or rando store brands feel like they're made of paper and fall apart in months. Kuhl and other higher end brands want like $140 for a pair of pants. Carhartt meanwhile is like $60 for a pair of duck pants that'll last years and I've honestly had OK luck so far with the Rugged Flex pants too but my one pair is less than a year old so we'll see how they hold up. I also find their fit better than other brands and they nail the pocket design, big enough to be useful but not so big that stuff falls over and gets stuck sideways in them.
>>
>>18765659
nta, but Dickies' clothes definitely have a cheaper feel and at least where I'm at they're priced noticeably lower than Carhartts. Basic Dickies t-shirts are almost see-through while the Carhartt shirts I own are real heavy-duty.
That being said I like wearing those lighter Dickies shirts more than the stiff-feeling Carhartts. I've also always been partial to how the Dickies' "trademark" frontal crease on their pants looks.
>>
>>18765575
Whatever I find at the thrift store that is good quality and cheap.
>>
>>18765747
I like dickies but I don’t wear them for work. I either buy the Milwaukee pants from Home Depot or Carhartt. Nothing else last. Dickies duck material feels like burlap and is really cheap. The hipster thing comes from guys that work at coffee shops wearing Carhartt, it’s a hold over from the Lumbersexual performative masculinity from the 2010s. These guys vote blue, and have a GF(male) or are in a poly relationship.
>>
>>18765753
this should just be the sticky desu
>>
>>18765607
>Bro it’s all about buying QUALITY materials built to last
>Here’s my 300$ jeans and 150$ flannel with 300$ boots
>oh these aren’t cool anymore let me hop on the next trend
These guys either got married to their hipster gf and live relatively normal lives and became NPR dad or became troons. There’s no inbetween and TDS hit them hard.
>>
>>18765575
Out of the three I like Carhartt the best.
>Better pants
>better Tshirts
>lots of different styles
Dickies
>874 and Double Knee work pants nice and great for everyday wear.
>I also like their button up work shirts. Just the quality (especially the flex) is crap but you get what you pay for. It’s also kind for funny they have a lot of knockoffs of Carhartt but for 1/2 the price at the expense of inferior materials.
Ben Davis
>The regular is just too baggy for me, and they never have the trim fit in my size. They’re definitely much better quality but i find their sizing to either run small or big.
>>
File: IMG_3118.jpg (145 KB, 819x1024)
145 KB JPG
>>18765607
Real tradies wear whatever’s at Walmart everything else is just a LARP for boys that have Grindr accounts
>>
>>18765863
Does anyone actually wear Ben Davis for work? They just seem like a brand that maybe 50 to 70 years ago people wore but it’s only for street wear.
>>
>>18765607
carhartt more like larp hard
>>
File: IMG_2808.jpg (1.94 MB, 1200x1600)
1.94 MB JPG
>>18765747
I guess they're "noticeably lower" but, at least where I am, it's not by enough to make it worthwhile, like $40 vs $60. I personally like the heavier stiffer stuff as well.

>>18765810
I get that the hipster thing exists, but they're still good solid work clothes that are as good as you can get for the price and availability, and I've always thought it was stupid how people (especially here on 4chan) will turn on stuff that's totally fine just because somebody they don't like has gotten into it. Anything that's good will eventually become popular with shitters and if you turn your nose up at all of it you'll end up only having abject garbage or ridiculous pretentious shit that makes you even more hipster than the hipsters left. Living in an area that's right around a 50/50 mix of gentrified hipster downtown and suburban/rural blue collar I see probably 10x the number of actual blue collar guys in Carhartt as I do hipsters in it too.

Funny story BTW, I'm in middle of nowhere Oregon about 3 hours from Portland, and a few months ago I was in the workwear section at the ranch store. An employee was talking to me and I noticed that they had some ugly bright blue limited edition Carhartt jackets (pic related) and I said something about it, and he told me that they'd had like 30 of them and they'd been shelfwarming for months until some random Portland hipster came in, saw them, and started completely freaking out about how rare they were and then bought like 5 of every size to take back and resell. Portland is Portland though and I don't really see the hip urban types wearing Carhartt around here, they've all moved on to Patagonia type stuff, or alternatively they're still full 2010s bluegrass larp.

>>18765865
>Real tradies wear whatever’s at Walmart
Maybe if you're some eternally poor tweaker "trade" like a roofer or something. Real skilled trades know that it's cheaper in the long run to buy decent quality stuff that'll hold up for more than a month.
>>
>>18765868
I’ve never seen anyone wear it
>>
>>18765977
that jacket could be cool if it wasn't such an ugly color
>>
>>18766146
could be a tad darker but it ain't that bad imo
>>
>>18766191
You’re Indian
>>
>>18766274
and you're a child
one of our statements is true and it ain't yours
>>
>>18765868
I really don’t think so, they’re more for people who know the “in” streetwear. They had a moment a couple of years ago, but I think Ben Davis is having trouble with production. 1/2 their stuff is out of stock.
>>
>>18766325
Okay ranjeet
>>
legit never heard of ben davis in my life prior to this thread
>>
>>18766477
I don’t know anyone that buys them
>>
There's no universal answer, I believe.

I accept that Ben Davis pants are better even though I don't have access to them as someone in EU - but the 874 is also ideal for my climate and anything thicket would get worn less.

My mainline new-detroit jacket is the best fitting and looking and feeling jacket I have, although I mostly wear my red tornado old-school detroits and my carhartt-wip ones more.

Dickies - as mentioned 874 for me both fit amazing, work for all cold months given my mild climate and also I love how they look once they're older. I also bought a couple of pairs of 877 canvas pants and they're just amazing in terms of fit, hand feel etc. I don't like how most of their jackets fit or even small details like the stitching color etc. but they're much more affordable than carhartt usually and when you find something that works for you it's great to have a cheap jacket that is as good as theirs are - I got an unlined hooded bomber that feels just AMAZING in hand, and I got for 40 euro I think.
>>
>>18766477
Me either
>>
>>18766477
Same, 30 length is sold out of every size but 32 has my fat ass waist. Might cop a pair to see if they're better than my Dickies.
>>
>>18767501
Ben Davis uses a thicker heavier duty material and actually has usable belt loops. My complaint is I don’t like the pockets. Something about them pisses me off.
>>
Can someone redpill me on Ben Davis?
>>
>>18765977
>Real tradies wear whatever’s at Walmart
Maybe if you're some eternally poor tweaker "trade" like a roofer or something. Real skilled trades know that it's cheaper in the long run to buy decent quality stuff that'll hold up for more than a month.
Carhartt isn’t even that expensive. Most jeans are around 80-90$ now, 50-70 for pants isn’t a bad deal. I actually like dickies but I don’t wear them to work. Dickies denim isn’t bad but their duck material is clearly inferior.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.