i've never seen a regular ass white person dress like this
>>18776575i look like this and dress like this
>>18776575I don't look like this but I dress like this
>>18776575I look like this but I don't dress like this
>>18776575what cellphones still have jacks for corded earbuds?outfit itself is good. saw this style a lot from 2007-2012, but is timeless in any era if you're young and thin. bdsm harness boots are kinda gay tho
Back in my days white twinks who dressed like this got shoved inside lockers
>>187765752011 wants their outfit back loser
>>18776632thisin the past month zoomers have gone from y2k to mid 2000s and now to "post" recession. At this rate they'll be in 2026 by the end of the night
>zoomers copying 2007 era Dustin Dolin, Shane Cross, Jim Greco now now that 90s skate fashion is played out>never seen a white person do this
>>18776575Nothing about that outfit looks remotely notable.
>>18776575What the fuck is with that pigeon toe shit. Why do people do that intentionally
>>18776656>>18776658Maybe something original will finally pop out of their generation
>>18776608to have sex?
>>18776575This shit was cute in the 00s, now it's just a plain copy and that's exactly why it doesn't work.Unless you're hot then everything works.
>>18776575when i was in college in montreal circa 2009-2014 everyone dressed kinda like this except for the boots (most people valued comfy warm shoes over fashionable footwear)
>>18776752To showcase the footwear. It looks effeminate, though.
Maybe related, I've been listening to the dandy wharhols a lot lately (never been a fan). I digg their late 90s-earlu 00s fits. A sort of proto-hipster or indie sleaze. Tempted to pivot my wardrobe into something along that line.
>>18776575this is just a basic ass Hedi fit
>>18776875>To showcase the footwearNot necessary. In fact it makes it worse because you can't see the inside of the boot.
>>18776575If you have to ask yourself if it's too much for a casual fit, then you're clearly not about it and which makes the you look performative.
>>18776981I would tell him to get rid of the jewelry for going to class. Then no one would think he’s in the “too much” zone. Maybe a single chain tucked under the shirt. If he’s going out at night drinking and not just to class, grocery shopping etc, then it is ok to peacock and add fag tags to the fit. But with all the extra baubles, his classmates will think “lol this tryhard faggot must’ve spent an hour this morning primping and preening and posing in the mirror with different outfits”. It’s welcome to see a young scholar wearing actual clothes instead of the sweatpants, pyjamas, sportsfan merch, sandals//crocs that typical amerigolems think it’s okay to leave the house in. Much fashion is performative. We’re all on this board so how many of us can say we’re better? I’ll allow it. How many people on earth are truly “about it” enough to have earned the right to wear that jacket?
>>18776575With that face he could wear anything really. But that fit is still clown tier.
>>18777344> It’s welcome to see a young scholar wearing actual clothes instead of the sweatpants, pyjamas, sportsfan merch, sandals//crocs that typical amerigolems think it’s okay to leave the house inI never understood that. If there is a time and place to express yourself through fashion, college years are the best years to do so.
>>18777344>It’s welcome to see a young scholar wearing actual clothesit doesnt matter how long your flowery blogpost is this is still laughably stupid given that the outfit in question is some plastic Halloween costume.
>>18777636I didn’t look closely at the webm. I just assumed the jacket was leather. I don’t mind people being a fag but if it’s plastic than he deserves to be executed.
