The way they have now listed everything as "unisex" is my cue to nope

>>18788688
this

>>18788688
>listed everything as "unisex"
Holy retardation

>>18788688
I got some pants from the women's section and they're highkey nice

>>18788728
Male fashion and female fashion shouldn’t be homogenized

>>18788728
What do you mean womens section? Everything is unisex

>>18788728
Next you will be pantied and sissyfied

>>18788747
all men's clothes can be worn by women but not the other way around, to women, all clothes are unisex

>>18788759
If they want to wear clothes that don't fit them, sure

>>18788762
This. It’s not true that all men’s clothes can be worn by women. The correct sentence is: “male fashion can be adopted by women but not the other way around”. Big difference.

>>18788762
You can find clothes that don't fit you any any gender section. You can also find clothes that fit you in any gender section. Fit is king, and as a man since so much of modern women's clothing is masculinized and they have a bigger vatiety/quantity of items, it's easier to find stuff that fits right in their section. Quality is in general worse in the women's section though.

>>18788894
You’re retarded. One of the biggest reasons why women shop in the men’s section is that men’s clothes are consistently better quality. You’re buying stuff that is not meant for you and is also less durable and usually full of plastic.

>>18788558
I will never understand why people shill for them. NPC clothing.

>>18788907
Quality is a spook. Fit is more important, and it's not like you can't find natural fabrics in the women's section.

>>18788558
Don't know what happened but Uniqlo is far better than they were when I first discovered them 15+ years ago.

So many of their clothes are well designed that I'm genuinely a loyal customer now. Good fabric quality, stitching, weaving, all that shit.

Today I bought their wide sweatpants. Extremely comfortable, deep pockets (compared to most other brands), thick yet soft fabric, and the cuffs around the ankles had drawstring.

YoungLA cant even give me a drawstring around the ankle cuff. They'd rather have me walking ruining my sweats by walking all over them.

Then I noticed my sweatshorts had nice deep pockets, but also an extra peice of fabric around the gooch area to keep it from ripping. And the weaving is 4-way or whatever that shit is called so it stretches in all directions

>>18789218
You’re still retarded. And gay.

>>18789340
>muh quality chud has no arguments aside from shit flinging

>>18789348
>subhuman broccoli hair zoomer dresses with women’s clothing and doesn’t understand the difference in fit because he’s low T, weak as fuck and also a brainlet
What a novelty

>>18788751
too late
anon is already wearing kneehigh stockings and slurping on my dick with enthousiasm rarely seen

i DEMAND thread ids so we can know when its him samefagging.

>>18789365
kek based

>>18789363
>buzzword diarrhea
How original.

You don't understand that human bodies have immense variation even within each sex, modern industrialized clothing tries to fit everyone into the least amount of fits/silhouette/sizes for profit. Ideally we'd all be getting made to measure clothing, but since labor is expensive and I'd rather not retouch some fast fashion slop, I'll shop wherever I get the fit I want.

But go on and build another strawman to vomit your passé buzzwords chud.

>>18789506
This. Many men also have breasts and large hips and narrow shoulders. Sometimes women walk around with mustaches. Some people have 4 arms or two heads. There is massive variation. Some women are built like an nfl lineman in full ogremode. We can't just make assumptions based on means here people sometimes there is a 7 foot tall woman or a 3 foot tall man and I'm sick of judgement for it. No body should be ashamed or feel worth less. Some women need jockstraps and some men need bras. And I for one am tired of not being allowed to walk around in a rennisance festival corset and thigh high high heel latex boots and a dog mask with breast implants. Capitalism did this.

>>18789567
>Many men also have breasts and large hips and narrow shoulders
You say this sarcastically but this is basically the redditor/4channer shut in phenotype. Wouldn't be surprised that you had this too.

The rest of your reductio ad absurdum is not worth addressing.

File: Screenshot_20261101-08163(...).png (811 KB, 1080x607)

811 KB PNG

>>18789632
I agree. A lot of trans identifying channers and redditors who got hormone curious. A lot of them with severe endocrine disruption to begin with from a heavy diet of convenient hyperprocessed treats and microplastic filled tv dinners. Then, with enough exposure, enough sedentary behavior, and maybe a nice hormone boost, womens plus sized clothes may fit them even better than mens plus sized!

>>18789506
>>18789567
You’re too young to understand any of this shit. My gf, who has a “womanly” shape (curvy in the right spots), loves to wear men’s trousers, but whenever she tries on ACTUAL men’s trousers, she complains that the front rise (where the button or zip fly is) is too low and flat and that the butt doesn’t fit. So that means she always ends up wearing MEN’S TROUSERS ADAPTED FOR WOMEN, which is the same as saying: women’s trousers inspired by men’s trousers. They LOOK the same, but they aren’t. And this is the most obvious shit in the world, since men and women have different bodies. Oh, well… at least as long as you aren’t a fucking zoomzoom child with no defined shape, no muscle or no manly bone/fat structure. In that case, stay sure you can wear Asian unisex baggy slop specifically designed to look “okay” on asexual bodies that are not defined by any particular characteristic. Also, to complete the argument, I myself enjoy some womenswear, but I work my way up to find those specific articles designed in a way that works with my own body. One of my favorite shirts I own comes from the women’s section of Selected Homme, it’s croppy and relaxed and soft, but it definitely doesn’t make me look like an underage faggot. TL;DR: “unisex” doesn’t exist, brands just make you believe in it.

>>18789835
>but I work my way up to find those specific articles designed in a way that works with my own body.
That's all I was trying to explain to the sperging chud fighting a culture war on his own. I have a short torso, the current trend of cropped/oversized clothing in women means I can shop their XL size knits and have the length be perfect while having enough space for my broad shoulders and arms. That doesn't mean it looks cropped, it doesn't go over my belt when I raise my hands. Most women's knits won't work since they're designed for breasts and small shoulders/arms. I do agree that "unisex" clothing doesn't exist, most men and women will fit better in clothing designed for their sex, that doesn't mean you can't shop in the opposing section if you have a particular body or are looking for a particular silhouette.

my 2 lambs wool sweaters have a hole or two in them after 2 short winters.
I've only ever handwashed them.

UNIKEK

>>18788558
Eunuchs are by definition a patrician bobble. Your use of it with proletariat is very silly. Whoever taught you this phrase is a fool and you are foolish to have repeated it. Ill let you get back to crying about jap old navy

>>18788728
Do they have any high rise pants? Uniqlo in Japan is still separated by gender