Why the fuck are TDEE calculators telling people that are 100kg that their maintenance calories are 2000? What the fuck is this bullshit?
>>77282344Easy. They aren't, this is a bait thread.
>>77282346i just filled one out for someone 110kg and it said their maintenance calories were 1800
>>77282346
>>77282351Kys you ugly fat ho
>>77282395have sex loser
>>77282442Obese fucking pig, glad you already have undetected cancer
>>77282507maybe its actually you that has cancer from the roids…maybe you will die without ever having a girlfriend…
>>77282344Because calories are a bullshit measure 100kg 180cm with 30kg of muscle mass (not lean mass, lean mass is literally more bones and water than muscle which dont require much energy) vs 100kg 180cm with 15kg muscle mass will never have the same "tdee" yet cicofags are vehement it is.The thing is, measuring muscle mass is absurdly inaccurate near impossible thus makes even this small fix redundant
>>77282351I'm glad we agree that what you just said isn't true. Thanks for proving it.
fatties don't need to eat more
>>77282555too late for that lolEnjoy your tit cancer you unloved stupid pig, you won't be missed
>>77282351>You are a 32 year old female who is 161 cm tall and weighs 112kg while being Sedentary
>>77282344That sounds pretty reasonable. Is there something I'm missing here?
>>77282690Shit i just saw thathey op you torta slut, post your tits
>>77282674awww you project i wont be missed because you don’t have close friends… maybe no true friends at all… ):
>>77282721>no uugly ass obese pig
>>77282351>over the hill>female>112kg lmaooooooofucking kys
>>77282344OP is just fat & just wants to eat more than the TDEE calculator by telling themsevles they know better.
>>77282346Yes, they do, mainstream nutritional advice is fucking braindead. Most of the people giving nutritional advice, various doctor lead organizations, have had almost no nutritional training. Beyond that, the current standards for training nutritionists and dietitians are molded by aforementioned medical standards.>so what?So TDEE calculations are fucking dogshit that would have fatties moving at snails pace cause of their estimates.
>>77282768>generally recommended to not exceed a weight loss of 2 pounds a weekLike this shit, why is this a thing? Cause some random fag doctor who doesn't know shit beyond his textbooks said that's "healthy," there are so many fucking "healthy standards," that are literally based on nothing.
>>77282351Basal metabolic rate is basically what your body burns if you're in a coma, you absolute retard.
>>77282783Anon, that doesn't prove the point you think it does.
>>77282768No. They dont.
>>77282807Very compelling argument. I bet you think calorie read outs on exercise machines are accurate too. Kek.
>>77282855Not everything is an argument. Sorry, you're so combative and you have no proof for your claims, resulting in ad hominem attacks and slinging insults. I hope things get better for you.
>>77282869you're almost twice my age and twice my weight, kys you dumb disgusting pig
>>77282873Really hope things get better man. Going to hide your posts and replies now. Sorry you're all angry.
>>77282881Nice concern troll, kys
>>77282351>161cm>112kg
>>77282724u wanna fugg me lol chubby chaser
>>77282766i just wanna eat around 2000 calories acty
>>77284235>actyactually
>>77284234Kys
>>77282344>>77282351>big pig requires lots of food to get and stay fat*Tim Allen grunt*
>>77282344because the calculator has no idea how said body is built, its going by the average person. BMR of 1870 for a 100 kg 1.61 m tall ((AVERAGE)) female with a ((BMI OF 38)) sounds reasonable. its not like your body needs more than others to function just because youre covered in an enormous layer of fat
>>77282344Fat really doesn't take much in the way of calories to maintain. If you were 100kg at 8% bodyfat it would be different.
>>77284237show cock bitch
>>77284354Kys no one loves you
>>77282351do u think 50 kg worth of fat cells require caloric expenditure to maintain ? that would ruin the point of the fat cells
>>77284399It requires caloric expenditure to haul around the extra weight.
>>77284392at least ive had sex
>>77284399Literally all your tissues start to die without a supply of energy. It's why untreated diabetes leads to rotting limbs. Your fat is full of blood vessels that constantly supply it with oxygen and nutrients.
>>77282351Okay, I'm not gonna be mean because I'm curious:Genuinely, what were you expecting your base metabolic rate while being a short woman? What was the woman you deluded yourself with all your life? Have you just been seeing the numbers for average adult males thinking it applied to you?
>>77282351Ma'am, you're very fat. Don't delude yourself, there is no path ahead other than eating less and moving more. Since you're not an old lady, you got to this point fairly fast, meaning you can definitely stand to eat way less.
>>77284732eating around 2000 caloreis should provide enough weight loss and 1800 should NOT be the fucking maintenance.ive done this before anyway i can eat 2000 and lose weight
>>77284771>1800 should NOT be the fucking maintenance1800 is not your maintenance, you dumb hog. >ive done this before anyway i can eat 2000 and lose weightYeah because BMR is your maintenance calories if and only if you're completely immobile. The calculator literally lists your maintenance calories as 2244 if you're sedentary, which means you're over 200 calories in deficit eating 2000 calories a day and lazing around like the fatass you are.
>>77284771like >>77284780 said, 1800 is not your maintenance, that number is the base, which is the number as if you were in a coma, with literally 0 activity. Your maintenance accounts for you moving around, even for small shit like getting our of bed and going to the bathroom and sitting down upright. It says right there, 2244So yeah, you can lose weight on 2000 because you are 224 below your maintenance (this is all just an approximation from a calculator, we don't know the exact numbers).Keep in mind though that 1 kg of fat is 7700 calories, so it would take you 34 days to lose a single kg. At 110 kgs while being 160ish cms, you should really consider a larger deficit than this.> but its hard :(Yes.
>>77284803messed up the numbers a bit, sorry, its 244, not 224. Number of days is 31.5 instead of 34.
>>77284780>not your maintenancethis is such a cope btw, you SHOULD be looking at your BMR and then adding your stepcount for accurate tracking
>>77282344Why does one piece have scars on his torso?Is he trans?
>>77282690Average American woman
>>77284828You're dumb as a bag of bricks, aren't you? First you're crying that you lose on 2000 calories but then you say that you should track according to your BMR. Pick a lane, fatty.>adding stepsThose are already accounted for by the "sedentary" category.
>>77284399>do you think having a metabolism requires a metabolism Yeah
>>77284892im not op.youre an idiot. "sedentary" is so vague - could be anything between 300 steps and 3000, good luck achieving anything living in fantasy land.
>>77282344Put your bodyfat% in, retard. A tdee calculator that doesn't let you factor that is garbage. And there are mulitple different formulas that try to calculate this shit for you. The link in the /fat/ general is actually a good resource for all of them.https://www.sailrabbit.com/bmr/Use the navy method for your bf%. It's only accurate for normal bodyfat ranges. Anything over 25% becomes increasingly less reliable, not that it matters since anything more than that is intolerable fatass tier regardless.
>>77286439when i cut from 101kg to 75kg at 6’2” i lowk put the bf estimation and everything (and i was completely realistic about my bf, i know that its impossible to be 100% accurate but i mean that i wasnt delusional thinking “damn i can see my top abs if i use 10kg i’ll be shredded”) and despite allat i was starving and was binging on my diet every like 4th-6th day by consuming everything that i could find, and i still lost weight fast lowk so idk i think that for some reason i burn a lot more calories than any calculator estimated
>>77282344I had to tell a coworker that no grown man should be eating 1600 kcal a day, and that his calculator was wrong
>>77282344The average guy of average height and weight needs around 2300 kcal to stay the same.Jews in KZs got 1600 kcal daily.
>>77286460You had to huh
TDEE calculators are so weird, i put in my stats, 26 years old 6'3 175lbs, moderate to high exercise (4 day split + 2 cardio sessions) with 5-10k steps a day and it estimate my maintenance at 2900-3100, that is way too high
>>77282777Trips of truth. Lots of my senpai went into medicine. They've got so much other shit going on, doctors barely touch nutrition. It's why hospitals hire nutritionists and dieticians in the first place but it's all back assward cause they're informed by the medical industry. They parrot the same braindead advice doctors give, just with more complex bullshit babble.
>>77286545There comes a point when you have to refute retardation for your own sanity. Plus a real friend, or concerned coworker, shouldn't let people become fatties without objection.
>>77282777Supposedly, slow weight loss avoids loose skin.OTOH back when nobody gave a fuck about slow or fast weight loss, nobody had loose skin and that phenomenon only appeared when people started losing weight slowly. Just look at bodybuilders or boxers and wrestlers who need to lose weight quickly, they never have loose skin.From my own experience, slow weight loss doesn't help with loose skin.
>>772866001600 is much to you? Are you asian or something?
