[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_6058.jpg (195 KB, 812x1349)
195 KB JPG
1 hard set
1 back off set

Is it really that simple to build some muscle?
>>
File: IMG_2814.jpg (435 KB, 2473x2560)
435 KB JPG
Almost
>>
>>77285838
If you do that for almost every individual head of a muscle sure. I've tried it and it works well enough but it doesn't really save much on time with all the set up unless you're doing most of it with dbs and supersetting a lot. Fun to do and see constant prs for a a months but it requires mastering a lot of really esoteric lifts.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.