in comparison to the avarage person consider yourself luck and fit if you are and I don't mean skinny fat with 20%+ body fat, I am talking 15% bf
>>77301417Not to be rude, but Americans really shouldn't be the standard to aim for, health- and fitness-wise.
>>77301424you are being very rude and xenophobic
Chicks got so fucking fat, holy fuck.>>77301424Not rude. We sincerely need to bring back fat shaming. It's the only way forward.
>>77301417How is the numbering system here supposed to work. There are 7 lines between 10 and 20.
>>77301435don't you know how to read graphics? sad you, come back after you graduate high school bro
>>77301430Insane almost all morbidly obese people are women hardly ever it is a guy the quality of women overall is down the gutter at this point, whores, abnoxious, feminists, liberals, annoying as fuck evil and a bunch of fat fucks.
>>77301417Pretty soon they're all gonna be 15% because of ozempic
>>77301488deads don't count
>>77301459>the quality of women overall is down the gutter at this point, whores, abnoxious, feminists, liberals, annoying as fuck evil and a bunch of fat fucks.Then they go write magazine articles titled "why are the men all unmarriageable?"
>>77301498pure clown world juice
>>77301417Post body OP Whatever you think your bf% is, you're off by 5% at least
>>77301430>Not rude. We sincerely need to bring back fat shaming. It's the only way forward.You were also fat when everyone was fat shaming.
>>77301516>looks like someone is butt hurt
>>77301521Fatty projection.
>>77301417women look best at 20-30% body fat you cant refute this
>>77302024yeah but not above that lol
>>77301424This is pretty based.
>>77302024I refute this
>>77301537>concession accepted
>>77302221low quality bait, do better, but here is your (you) if you're too needy
>>77301435There isn’t a correct bin width for histograms. You are supposed to play around with different values to find what appears to represent the underlying distribution well. Too small and there’s a lot of variance between bins ans low counts, both due to a finite number a samples. Too big and you’re not plotting a distribution (i.e. if the width was the entire range, you’d get one bin, not meaningful). This was generated with the ggplot R package, which allows you to choose the width either by providing the raw width or providing a total number of bins that will be used with the range to calculate bin width. The number of bins is convenient because it works independent of the range. By default ggplot uses 30 bins, and the author here was too lazy to change it for his data. So that’s what leads to a width that doesn’t divide the distance between tick marks
>>77302024>women look best at 20-30% body fat>you cant refute thisThis is correct. But most people don't understand 20% body fat for a woman is like 10% body fat for a man. A woman should never be below 20%. 25% is ideal fit with curves.
>>77301424The average american woman weighs nearly as much as a blastoise. by 2030 50+% of this nation will be obese
>>77301417I’m fat as fuck
>>77302249some women like to bulk though like men to maybe get bigger tits and ass some fatties never grow tits though and then get depressed much like men and just stay that weight
>>77301430Bring back?
>>77301417Most women are no more than overgrown children with no willpower and running off emotion. They eat unhealhty shit because it's pleasurable and when they get fat fail every diet they try every time.
>>77301417>>77303721It feels good being a man. If I drink 1500 calories and eat a ton of food I can just go bust out some sets and it's a win.
>>77301417>comparing yourself to the average americanno thanks
>>77302489No, by then they'd all be on Ozempic, just like they're on SSRIs now. Women are alergic to accountability, but also don't want to face the repercussions so they'll continue to take these shortcuts, side effects be damned.
>>77303730>No, by then they'd all be on Ozempicdo you really think that ozempic and its related fat loss drugs are going to get cheaper, or that the economy is going to get better for them to become more affordable by then? Lets not forget the studies that have been posted here stating that only ~60% of the weight lost from these drugs are fat, and the rest is bone and stuff.
>>77303761They will become more affordable even if it's from women demanding it from the government with our gynocentric society. And as I said, women don't give a fuck about side effects.
>>77302217Well I am futing it.
>>77303761>Lets not forget the studies that have been posted here stating that only ~60% of the weight lost from these drugs are fat, and the rest is bone and stuff.correct me if i'm wrong but isn't this not true of reta?
>>77301456I know how to read it you stupid fucking moron I'm just pointing out the numbering is uneven. Actually kill yourself "bro."
