[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hodge.jpg (37 KB, 474x447)
37 KB JPG
Seems like they are formed in the womb, like fingerprints.

These are identical twins and yet one has symmetrical abs while the other has obvious asymmetry.
>>
>identical twins
>not identical
Their veins also seem to be different patterns, but I can't really get a good look at th same body part on both of them.
>>
>>77306979
Veins are interesting, I've read into it. Some appear to have set positions, others are positioned differently depending on the individual. So twins do have different vein distribution, although main ones, so to speak, are positioned similarly.
"Identical twins" refer to monozygotics. Twins IRL suck, not only are identicals the rare type of twin, they are not perfectly identical like cartoons would have you believe. It's truer to say monozygotic twins are very similar looking people, usually difficult to distinguish at a glance.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.