[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/fit/ - Fitness


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1692551583439.jpg (193 KB, 843x1280)
193 KB JPG
i started lifting 4 months ago and i'm getting to the point where linear progression isn't automatic anymore. i understand that it can be considered a stall/plateau if i fail to hit the target sets x reps in consecutive sessions.

what do you personally do or suggest here? i have heard
>deload ~10% and proceed as normal
>deload ~10% and proceed, but AMRAP last set
>rep cycle (e.g., stuck at 200x3x8, do 200x3x6 -> x7 -> x8)
>change the set x rep scheme altogether
>>
I'd recommend 600 test 750 hcg / week
>>
>>77319538
Start 1rming like crazy every weeks for 2 months every single session and up your sessions to 5 or 6
>>
>>77319538
Get micro plates, alternate lifts, switch reps and set schemes, alternate frequency
>>
File: whoopsie.jpg (98 KB, 880x532)
98 KB JPG
>>77319548
I'd recommend hiding this post
>>
>>77319553
this is genuinely terrible advice
OP all the things you mentioned can work, i do increasing reps (for me it's more like x876, 877, 887, 888) but that's unnecessarily slow for someone of your experience level. i think the first two examples you listed are what is more commonly prescribed in LP programs
>>
>>77319538
>i started lifting 4 months ago and i'm getting to the point where linear progression isn't automatic anymore.
you are doing something wrong
i'm 2 years in and still making progress every single session
>>
>>77319538
Those legs cant be the natty limit can they?
>>
>>77319955
if you're still making linear progress after 2 years you're the one doing something wrong kek
>>
>>77319538
>i started lifting 4 months ago and i'm getting to the point where linear progression isn't automatic anymore.
At 4 months you definitely shouldn't be plateauing.

Try taking a rest day or a light day. You might be fatigued. But then go back into it trying to set a new PB.
>>
>>77319955
>>77320787
OP here, not sure what i'm missing. for example, my program has me adding 5 lbs per bench session, or +7.5 lbs/week. i started at repping 95. 95+7.5*17 = 2pl8 for reps. i'm not quite there personally because i took two week long breaks and my training hasn't been perfect, but you get the idea. are you telling me that if i'm not benching 2pl8 for reps after 4-5 months i'm fucking up? because i looked into the timeline for 2pl8 and most people reported a timeline on the scale of about a year +/- 4 months

i've been overbulking if anything and have been sleeping 7+ hours most nights, so it's not that
>>
>>77320840
Adding 5 pounds per session every session is not realistic after the first few months. Add 5 pounds per session IF YOU CAN. If you can't then don't add the 5 pounds, just add an extra rep. Then add 2 extra reps next seesion. THEN drop 2 reps and add 5 pounds. Or work out some sort of progression system that works for you.
>>
>>77320840
add a rep or add weight, whichever one you can



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.