>BMI doesn't factor in muscle
Is it a better chance that I have more muscle or more fat at 6'2" 205 lbs? Slab genetics and full blown natty
>>77333081>it’s another fitizen claiming 6ft+ when less than 9% of us isSigh
>>77334401smoked his ass
>>77332891god damn he looks like a fucking retard
>>77333081At 6'2 you could be realistically sub15% bodyfat at 205, any shorter you would have competitive level genetics or you are too fat and delusional.I am 6'1 and lifting for 10 years, I have elite level lifts for either weight I reach, yet I get fat above 190 lbs. One inch difference is huge when it comes to weight distribution.
>>77334401Americans measure their height wearing shoes usually when just being colloquial, that's probably it. And big sneakers and cowboy boots can add 5cm (!).
>>773344019% is not rare
>>77332891>BMI doesn't factor in fat
>>77333081204 lbs lean is your natty potential. You’re probably just fat
>>77336768I’m 6’2 75kg and feel filled out. Never grew my legs though, maybe I gotta eat more
So you sane 225 lbs ripped is possibly roids
>>77334401For whiteoids it's probably more like 30% being 6' or above.
Why his head so small hehe
>>77334401Balkan niggas are tall, even the women
Head like a fucking tow ball.
>>77334403stfu retard bot
>>77332891It does. It factors in the baseline amount of muscle a person who doesn't work out has
Hasan mogs every alt right facelord my BMI is 21.8
>>77332891why is he built like a bridge troll
>>77332891The bigger issue with BMI is that it doesn't take frame into account. If there's a 5'8" woman with a tiny petite frame, and a 5'8" man with a thick robust frame, their ideal weights will be far different from one another.
>>77337548frame includes height brah, there's no such thing as a "tiny petite" 5'8" woman. say narrow-framed or something
>>77337565No, they're different, hence "height" and "frame" being listed separately.
>>77334401we're not all Mexican, Chinese or Indian
>>77334401>6ft+>tallLiterally every other male through my extended family is like 6'2 at a minimum. I'm the shortest at 6'1.
>>77337655Less than 15% of the population is over 6 feet tall, and that's just including whites and blacks. It's even lower when you include all the Mexicans and Indians and Asians as well.
>>77337667who convinced you people that populations/statistics matter? less than 1% of the population has shaken my hand big fucking deal eh?
>>7733766720% of British white males are over 6 ft, with 30-55% depending on white western/northern Euro nation or Dinaric alps region is selected.>>77332891my fat aunt says this, apparently using professional rugby palyers for reference applies for her 58 year old ass.
>>77337548That's why "healthy weight" is a range, dumbass.
>>77337677Yes, and their healthy weight ranges will be far different from one another. What's your point?
>>77337675That's because they're in Europe, so they've got more of that race of ultra tall blonde guys over there.
>>77337679No, you idiot. At 5' 8" the health weight range is 120lbs to 160lbs. That ALREADY accounts for gender and frame.
>>77337481He lies about his height. He adds two inches. He's actually the same height as me, but I don't have a head like a tow ball or a 40 inch waist.
>>77337684120 lbs for a male with a huge frame is anorexic-tier underweight.
>>77337712>being this fucking stupidThat's the point. The females with small frames skew to the bottom end of the range. Males with large frames skew to the top end of the range.
>>77337724The idea behind BMI is that if you're in the healthy range, you're supposedly "healthy", not "maybe healthy or maybe unhealthy depending on your frame".
>>77337736You would still be healthy at 120lbs as a male with a large frame. You'd just be skinny, which is not unhealthy.
>>77337601>she's got a tiny, petite frame bro, i'm telling youOK lol
>>77337805She's tall with a small frame.
>>77337736the idea behind BMI was to quantify a socially ideal human and was invented in the 1800s by a mathematician turned woo-woo psychologist who never intended for it to be used in a medical context. listen to yourself, what point are you even trying to make?
>>77337677>>77337684no that is not why healthy weight is a range you fucking mong, healthy weight is a range because there is a range of acceptable weights that can be considered healthy. are you saying everyone only has ONE healthy weight based on their gender, weight, and frame? fuck you, you pissed me off with your retardation
>>77338083>are you saying everyone only has ONE healthy weight based on their gender, weight, and frame?Yes. If the range is wide enough, which it is. This is why BMI is an effective and useful tool.Cry more, fatfuck.
>>77338173>are you saying everyone only has ONE healthy weight>Yes. If the range is wide enough
>>77338182It's based on height, so it wouldn't be literally everyone, but everyone at that height. Yes.
>>77337481Sammy fumigated that roach by challenging him to a fight which hasan awkwardly ducked for weeks. He looked extremely nervous whenever the topic was brought up in public or even in his live chat because he had no response that didn't seem like a pathetic excuse. Complete and irreversible aura loss
>>77338258Sam is a mid forties overweight roided out chud with no kids or legacy besides gumroadHasan is a white passing 6’3 chad, handsome, jacked made nearly 15m just last year, is dating Valkyrae and will most likely have mostly white passing children with her, Try again
>>77338282>white passinglol
>>77332891he looks like sam seder and steven crowder
>>77334414he's fat anon, so are you.
the fact that you chuds know anything about any of these ecelebs makes one thing very clear: you're not lifting enough heavy things and spend too much time on your computer you fat ugly nerds
