Why do I need more?
Potato with all the fixings.
>>77339779Based Martin
>>77339772nigga dat shit is dry
>>77339772Needs an avocado and some fried eggs
>>77339779usecase?
>>77340242taste that brings happiness
>>77339772>1:6 fat-protein ratioYou need more fat, loser.
>>77339772Because when you don't eat more, you end up with low testosterone and diabetic, like Dr. Sean Baker.
>>77340450Bro is like 70. Doesn’t test naturally decrease when you’re old
>>77340455Yeah you're right it has nothing to do with his eating disorder or one single food. Way to ignore the diabetes also.
>>77340311>1:6 fat protein ratioNot even close by any metric. Ribeye is about 1:1 per macro gram, ergo 2.25:1 fat to protein by calorie.
>>77340450Why do you only have and spam this one very old anecdote? Why does everyone else who does low carb reduce their A1c and feel better subjectively? Why are you autistic, moxyte?
>>77340457Explain the Maasai. You won’t
>>77340552You're right, I won't discuss a totally irrelevant topic after you tried to pivot after defending a grifter and failing.
>>77339772Doesn't need much more but eggs and/or fish would complete it.
>>77340679Eggs are a great addition to any diet
>>77340457You are literally carnivorous yourself you are just too stupid to realise it and eat properly. Aside from that, thousands of diabetics have reversed their conditions by removing modern foods now.
>>77339772You don't.
>>77340698Sorry you're so upset that your posterboy is in poor health because of his eating disorder :(
>>77340698The reading comprehension and the ability to discern context clues on this website has gone down precipitously - And this post is a clear example of that.
>>77339772Water, but that's all
>>77339772>no Vitamin C (needed for collagen formation)>no fiber (needed for good gut bacteria)>no Folate>no Vitamin K1>no carbohydrates (primary source of fuel for brain and muscles)
>>77340910Get ready for the carneys to reply angrily telling you you don't need any of this or some weird workaround way they have to weasel out of this. (You're not wrong, I'm just saying)
>>77340919they're genuinely mentally ill, everything is a conspiracy theory to them, including recommended amounts of vitamins
>>77340931I know
>>77340910>>no fiber (needed for good gut bacteria)demonstrably false\>The most interesting and perhaps contentious finding was that there was no significant change in alpha-diversity in either group (18). Those on the ABD saw an increase in the relative abundance of bile-tolerant microorganisms, like Bilophila, Alistipes, and Bacteroides spp., and a decrease in the relative abundance of microbes known to metabolize complex dietary plant fibers, such as Roseburia, Eubacterium, and Ruminococcus spp. While often cited as evidence that an ABD is harmful, this is far from conclusive. The PBD, despite being supposedly uniquely capable of producing butyrate from microbiota-accessible carbohydrate metabolism, produced only slightly more butyrate than did the ABD, with the ABD also resulting in significantly greater production of isovalerate and isobutyrate (Fig. 1) (18). Isobutyrate has been shown to activate many of the same receptors as butyrate (see “Considering alternative pathways” below), weakening the notion that PBDs are significantly “better” for the gut due to butyrate/SCFA production.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8092254
>>77340946Like clockwork
>>77340963>vegtard copeslike clockwork
>Carney resorts to calling people who disagree with him veganLike clockwork
>>77340946I'm making no sense out of that but you mean Big Fiber wants us to eat it for no good reason
>>77340946Would you agree with the statement that fiber feeds a specific kind of bacteria, and that adhering to a diet that excludes dietary fiber causes those specific kinds of bacteria to be reduced in number?
>>77341056Dude, don't engage him. He posted a PubMed article that Has been endlessly posted here every single time by carnies, even though it doesn't prove their point. In order to prove that you don't need fiber for healthy gut bacteria, you would have to start from time to zero and feed a baby exclusively animal products and then measure their gut biome over the years with other people's gut microbiome. All this proves is that if a person eats a normal diet that contains fiber and then ceases consuming fiber, the gut microbiome will adapt to the already established gut microbiome. It does not actually prove that eating a strictly carnivorous diet with no fiber will produce a healthy gut microbiome. It's entirely fallacious. Don't engage with these kinds of people.
>>77340967You're brownIndian or south american?
Red meat is probably the single healthiest thing most people can eat…IF the fat content is generally low and it’s not been transformed into some obese frankencow by bioengineered food and chemical treatments. Why do you need more? Well long term it’s unlikely you don’t develop at least some deficiencies and you’ll definitely be operating sub-optimally. I don’t know why people refuse to believe what the literature and simple reasoning clearly demonstrate: the healthiest diets for not all but most people are diets high in protein especially from natural red meat and natural fish like salmon and trout, high in fiber especially from whole fruits, vegetables and starches, a diet medium to high in carbohydrates generally depending on activity level, a diet with low to moderate fat, basically the minimum for optimal hormonal and cellular function, and a diet that is calorically appropriate for your energy expenditure. Obviously not all ways of getting any of these are healthy. Sure you could balance out your calories by drinking beer but it’s not the best choice, and some veggies might give you GI distress. But at the end of the day, appropriate foods for meeting all these is clearly the optimal diet for most of us. If you want to make red meat the core of that diet, it’s fine. But it’s obviously not optimal because you’re still missing all those other components.
>>77339772some sides would be nice like >>77339779
