how long will it take to invent roids that don't hurt your health?is there some research or product going on even just from testing?from my years of research even anavar isn't good for you
>>77421407Ecdysterone probably fits the bill based off extensive in vitro and in vivo data, although clinical data is a little sparse so far.
trevogrumab and garetosmab. who knows if anything will come from it, it'll probably be a while in any case.
>>77421412>monoclonal antibodiesNot steroids, just other deranged China shit purported to build muscles. I'm sticking to weaker myostatin inhibitors until we see if the tendon issues are worse than fluoroquinolone antibiotics, as some natty knock-out/down mutants who've posted on here hint at.
>>77421407Roids taken in small doses is not bad for you—if anything, it's good for you. Look at 70s bodybuilders and actors. Stallone still swears that HGH massively improved his health.
>>77421428>HGH>roidsI sleep
>>77421428>Stallone still swears that HGH massively improved his health.Buth he stilf talz wiz a spees impezimen.>protip: hGH != roids, also is really very messy pepe-tide whore-moan drug with lots of good and bad downstream effects all mixed together
honestly if you ever spent your 20s doing coke/ket/MDMA 3 cycles of test then test eq anavar and then test tren won't ever hurt you, i did that and packed enough muscle to look like a super jacked natty
>>77421411Placebo has eves extensive studies over 100+ years and WORKS just as good if not better. But i wouldn't even take that, better to think straight, i go as far as to avoid runner's high or at the very least keep ot in reigns.
>>77421407>how long will it take to invent roids that don't hurt your health?What's the use case, exactly? The only meaningful market for this are bodybuilders chasing beyond what is possible naturally, which are generally lower class retards that will buy the shit that's slowly killing them anyways, so there's no reason to invest into research. You can't even charge them a lot more because they're poor, they would settle for regular, cheap roids instead. It's a shitty business model.
>>77421428Dude takes copious amounts of roids and hgh to look like a normie who lifts 3 times per week... yea, it totally didn't wrack his endocrine system.>>77421407Excessive muscle mass that isn't achievable natty is never healthy. And taking roid to reach what is possible natty is beyond retardation
>>77421407They basically increase the nutrient priority for muscle at the expense of other organs, they can't not hurt your health.
>>77421407>taking exogenous testosterone instead of progressively overloading your testicles
>>77421528Placebo has the most absolutely shit-tier mechanistic data though, and it's not a steroid.>t. not victim weight in part thanks to ecdysterone>>77421563>What's the use case, exactly?>no reason to invest into researchSarcopenia is usually the "indication" to look at, like ecdy in clinical trials for that rn.>>77421796>implying test qualifies>2026
>>77421407Everything works through equivalent exchange
