>1950's competitionThis is how bodybuilding should look
>>77601984Why would you want to look different than this
>>77601984Even at a bodybuilding show, these geezers had their pants all the way up to their bellybutton.
>>77602117yeah real niggas like us always be saggin n shiet ya hurrd shiieet faggot
>>77601984>top 1% genetics without roidsremember than anyone bigger, leaner or bigger and leaner than HALF of this is 100% frauding
>>77602117The only correct location for the waistband of your pants or shorts
>>77601984This is plain uninteresting, it's always been a freakshow and should stay that way
>>77601984nice pantiessurely this is already on roids
>>77601984Torso looks good. Frankly, the legs are underwhelming. Leg size is probably not so bad, but genetically, this Jew holds fat on his thighs more than his abdomen. Needs better legs.
>>77602467That's Reg Park the guy who inspired Arnold to do bodybuilding. I think the reason his legs don't look impressive to you is a combination of it being earlier in his career, the angle, and him not really flexing. If you look at other pictures of him he has huge legs and just looks bigger overall. Also that's kind of a funny pic cause the full photo has Steve Reeves standing right next to him.Also this is bait then please forgive me, I'm getting older and I can't always tell anymore.
>>77602467Silver era routines usually just had a squat for legs which was generally light weight because squat cages/racks weren't standard practice yet. Sometimes they'll have a deadlift which looked more like a SLDL but this was rarer. They neglected hamstrings and glutes in that era.It's still what people should be basing their routines off of, because the time period meant less severe steroid use. They don't because they're uncs that aren't in vogue enough to be admired.
