She's right you know
>>108869708AI slop
only one of four was created by humans.
>>108869731
i would like to see her ass so i can decide whether she's right or not
>>108869708eat your slop in quiet, pigs
>>108869744
>>108869708if AI wasn't slop, why does it all look the same?
>>108869778because they are too lazy to add a style to the prompt
>>108869708i know this is petty but the AI image posted doesn't even get an obvious fact right, since monsters inc wasn't released until ~2001 and probably wasn't near-finished in production in fucking 1995 (toy story i think)
The digital slop guy was absolutely correct now we got absolutely horrible animation like invincible or shitty CGI special effects like literally every capeshit movie
>>108869708AI art is an oxymoron.but i guess that's too hard a concept for jeets to grasp, since they live a fully vicarious life.
>>108869950oh and apparently even if "digital animation" includes entirely 2D content, that wasn't a thing until around 1990. i don't like to "erm akshually" people but you can tell that original post was targeted at indians. they see it and they accept it as fact. well, they don't even acknowledge it. it's subconscious. not a single layer of primitive internal thought, much like an insect
>>108869978rape
>>108869708Both digital and film caused a pretty significant loss in terms of skill and aesthetics within art. But a key difference is that they opened up new possibilities within art itself to offset these losses e.g. photography as a field or painters moving from realistic portraits to stylized work. AI does not do that. It has not advanced any field of art, it just drowns them in slop.
>>108869708>cartoon style changes 3 times in 4 panels
>>108870120Yeah. It went back 40,525 years, having a style change or two is to be expected - but just like you imply, three is a lil much.
>>108869708"she" is a man posting from punjab
>>108870120>>108870140>Confusing dress style/body shape with cartoon styleLOL, it's all the same style
>>108870140>>108870185it only changes once, the third panel is a different art style from the others.
>>108870213First to second, check the hands, mouth, head shape, glasses, ears, speech bubble Third panel entirely different styleFourth panel has way different proportions, different hair, different head shape
Who the fuck didnt like monsters inc
>>108869708>SheHe (Indian)
>>108869708We used to have movies hand animated in places like Burbank and Orlando and Paris, but now they're done by studios like Technicolor Group Bangalore, Prayan Animation, and Digitoonz (Kolkata)
go back to twitter, faggot
>>108869708This doesn't even address the whole point.If I ask my friend to draw a picture of a blue cat, did I make that painting since the blue cat part was my idea?If I ask an image model to generate an image of a blue cat, did *I* create art?
>>108869708All of those are true.>painting is slop compared to reality>film is slop compared to painting>digital is slop compared to film>ai is slp compared to human made digital
>>108869935A style developed by whom?Where do you get that style from?Does the AI come up with some new style?
>>108869708it's impossible to argue with this
>>108869708There is no "AI art", it's digital ersatz produced from synthesising past human art.Sure you could keep producing that until all novelty is dead.Then what?Then you have a bunch of datasets everyone is bored of, because no new styles emerge
>>108870403I work with animators who in (2026) still dislike/refuse to learn 3d animation because it's not "real animation".They are all zoomers btw
>>108869708I don't think anyone can with a straight face say they prefer 3D animation to 2D animation.But destruction of society will continue until shareholder value improves.>>108869950Rin adorable
>>108870403in 1995? everyone since monster inc is from 2001.
It's actually kind of fascinating how little AI art has actually affected anything I care about. It was supposed to be some kind of extinction level event. But no, the artists I adore still draw like they always have. They've not gone anywhere. All my feeds are entirely devoid of AI slop. Slop-posting on /g/ is pretty much the only things that even reminds me that this AI crap exists. The slop has been shunned to it's own sad little corner of the internet.I had an AI art phase in the AnythingV3 days, so I'm not exactly a complete luddite. There even is the occasional gen artist I follow eg @umage_info purely for inspiration for my own works. But I lose interest even in this "good" AI art almost immediately. It just gets instantly repetitive and I am back to seeking human art and artists.
>>108870978They are right, that shit never looked real to me
>>108869708>ChatGPT, generate “I AM SILLY!!!!” comicDamn, she got me. I am convinced, I love AI “art” now
>>108870978Sorry unc, you’re chopped and they’re right
>>108870964They're all right. You can make slop with anything. The only unique part about AI is it makes every stupid cunt with a phone believe they're an artist.
>>108869708Piss filter
>>108869708all 4 are correct
>>108869708None of it matters because most people that are trying to make a living are pragmatists not ideologues.
>>108869708Every AI fan post demonstrates that every AI fan is mentally ill.
>>108870955same can be said for anything done by an "artist", they took a style from someone else and that chain of taking styles can be linked back to a caveman first looking at nature and mimicking it by scraping a rock in the ground, on a tree, on a rock wall
>>108869958the proof how idiotic your comment is would be picking 50 produced art, 50 randomized non AI art and seeing if you can pick out any AI. This has already been proved in other blind tests because despite pattern recognition the human brain has limits even if experts are employed to sort through things.
>>108869708>She's right you knowBottom left, bottom right and top right characters are all mocking a newer visual medium as inferior. What visual medium is top left mocking? Protip: you're fucking retarded.
Why do bot farms train their spambots on mentally ill reddit "comments"? Don't they ever inspect the output? Trash like >>108873141 should send a LLM back to the training camp.
>>108873149
>>108873179>posted it againThis botfram's meme database is like 3 images total. Why don't they just use their artistic machines to generate new stuff?
>>108873149And here is the proof. You are a faggot, you don't even have pattern recognition skills in this thread, never mind trying to pick 50 AI images, videos, music etc etc out of 100. Your brain immediately engages group think bias mentalities, a NPC which is ripe for slurping up whatever is said. This is how politicians can easily stay in power, how Hollyslop and the "music" industry keep serving up garbage, how the vidya industry sell complete garbage for years and years.
>>108873193>Why doesn't AI produce something like a Jackson Pollack painting. I do love his style, the way the colours blend, the unruly nature of it all. Absolute chaos going on. £180M plus tip..
>>108873193>no argumentI accept your concession
>>108873201>>108873224>>108873230>explosion of impotent rageSeriously, why do they feel compelled to get their training data from mentally ill retards and brown jeets? Are those the only sources for pro-"""AI""" sentiments or something?
>>108873142>Bottom left, bottom right and top right characters are all mocking a newer visual medium as inferior. What visual medium is top left mocking?kek. this will go unanswered
>>108869708MathSlop!
>>108873271>no argumentI accept your concession
>>108873325What am I supposed to argue against? Your generic spambot talking point has no relation to the post you were trying to "refute". Your handlers should euthanize you and use a newer model.
>>108873290It's so fucked graphing calculators still exist. The only thing that keeps us from hanging (((public educators))) is there's so many of them.
>>108873271If AI models can produced Western art of all types whether images, video, music etc then how exactly is that jeet crap? Also why are Hollyjews, the music industry up in arms that images, videos, music etc are allowing anyone to gen? Why the cease and desist letters if it is just jeet garbage? Also why are you so protective of kikes who are the ones trying to hold back AI? In addition, there is nothing stopping anyone still picking up a pen and paper and drawing as before, pick up a mic and instrument, pick up a video camera and film. If that can best anything AI, then why worry?
How do AI developers deal with incest?
>>108873343Notice how this broken language model keeps shitting out incongruent responses. Looks like it's just not cost-effective to use this tech even to generate believable spam.
>>108873371>NO U!!.
>>108873386>did it again awardEvery single reply it shat out in this thread is incongruent.
>>108873393
>>108873335People can't reliably distinguish between human art and AI art in some cases
>>108873403>People can't reliably distinguish between human art and AI art in some caseshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuous_truthThere is no such thing as "AI art". Try again.
>>108873412People can't reliably distinguish between human art and imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble art
>>108873412If a human copies a style from another human - is it still a human produced art if the AI also does the same thing and there is no discernible difference between the tow images? Then if comes down to the bias element, if you can't decide which is better or worse and then are told one is AI (you were not told AI produced one of them) would your opinion change?
>>108873438>People can't reliably distinguish between human art and imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble artFor the sake of argument, let's suppose it's true. What does it have to do with the fact that "AI art" doesn't exist?
>>108873451>spambot shits out another fully generic and incongruent replyEvery single time. I'm not even sure this is a full-blown LLM. It looks like a generic database lookup, like they gave up on using their own products.
>>108869708>she
>>108873461yep you got me. I am a LLM. I am using millions of US gallons (litres?) of water in this very thread that has a few people, that will be archived and forgotten about. Not to mention the megawatts of leccy in order to put out how AI is so so good for humanity. But my best mates in China are also doing the same, covering their land in solar panels and it is all for U. Yep, /g/ a board that has a few threads dedicated to AI, threads dedicated to headphones (actually in ear headphones). I could go on, I scanned the catalogue and just listed a few. The AI threads on other boards, the ragebait of fags with pretentious thinking that their precious Hollyjew is under threat. And the irony is they all post from phones or computers which 40 or so years ago the same luddites said was dangerous to society. The industrial revolution where chuds smashed up machines because it threatened their 60 hours of back breaking work, that they might live beyond 60 years old - the very thought of it. Anyways, I hope you have that pencil and paper and are drawing right now, gotta keep your "talent" going. :)
>>108873515Imagine thinking anyone's gonna read this slop.
>>108873456Even if AI art doesn't exist, most people cannot meaningfully tell the difference between human art and imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble art 1) The knowledge of knowing whether or not the image was created by a person vs generated by AI is the criteria for judgement rather than interpretation of the image itself2) More importantly, the masses will accept imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble art because cheap and easy entertainment outweighs artistic intent
>>108873521It's of no consequence, this thread will be archived and forgotten about. Enjoy it whilst it last.
>>108873451Your rhetoric is barely coherent but it's the same tired old theme with your lot and the obvious response is that correct evaluation depends on the origin of the image.
>>108873526>AI art doesn't existGlad we have that settled.>most people cannot meaningfully tell the difference between human art and imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble art This is a lie but it's not even worth discussing because it's irrelevant.>The knowledge of knowing whether or not the image was created by a person vs generated by AI is the criteria for judgement rather than interpretation of the image itselfIt's not necessarily "the" criteria (most AI slop is just trash visually) but it's a perfectly good criterion rooted in an understanding of what art is.>The masses will accept imagery generated by AIAnd the masses are going to get heavily culled.
>>108873532Why are you still replying to a LLM (me) tho? You better put the drink down and sober up, it isn't even the weekend and already drinking. Non functioning alco's are far far worse than supposed high functioning ones.
>>108873532>Your rhetoric is barely coherent but it's the same tired old theme with your lot and the obvious response is that correct evaluation depends on the origin of the image./thread
>>108873526>the masses will accept imagery generated by AI that is meant to resemble art because cheap and easy entertainment outweighs artistic intentI haven't seen anything to indicate this other than retards AI psychosis-ing themselves into thinking they're making art. Nobody else wants to look at their slop. If anything image models have proved definitively that there's no such thing as art without suffering.
>>108873549>This is a lie but it's not even worth discussing because it's irrelevant.I could show you a video as evidence but you would simply dismiss it>And the masses are going to get heavily culled.By whom?
>>108873563>spambot gets derailed this easily
>>108869708>1995>monsters inc.AI slop
>>108871061literally all its good for is discretely generating single image porn and even then human artists still best it easily. you just can't replicate human design choices with a stochastic parrot, unless you like, collage different gens together. but then that's too much effort for the average person slopping so it never happens. its also annoying to do because the outputs are inconsistent, like if you prompt for 'blue ribbon', there's twenty different ways the model will interpret that, when you really just want it to put a blue ribbon on the anime girls head. so lets say i want one shot of a girl with black hair and a blue ribbon in her hair, smiling and looking at the viewer, then in the next image of the set I want a side angle shot with her looking into the distance. in the first shot you'd settle on one particular ribbon design and go with it. but good fucking luck getting that exact same ribbon on the next shot, let alone the same eyes the same face the same hair. now you need a ribbon lora at the very least and inpainting basically. and thats a whole other monster, so obviously you open it in photoshop and-now you're just a digital artist with extra steps and no fundamentals. great.and anyway the result is something everyone will instantly just ignore as soon as they notice its AI. so retarded that what the people with the resources to train local went with was a tag based prompt structure and now we're stuck with it, while all the rest of this tech is moving forward with natural language processing which was the whole fucking point of this shit in the first place.
>>108873549>It's not necessarily "the" criteria (most AI slop is just trash visually) but it's a perfectly good criterion rooted in an understanding of what art is.this kills the golem. you're supposed to heckin' consume, not think about where the product came from, ok??
>>108873562>>108873566You can hold your convictions and think that you're right all you want. At the end of the day, the masses will accept AI slop because it will eventually be "good enough". Just look at the pigeon animation generated by seedance. Sure, human creativity is something most people care about. However, if the entertainment is "good enough" and doesn't cost as much money as works created by people, the industry will pursue this method. Human greed wins out every time
kek, you just have to love the pretentious nature of anons on a tech board. And they makea beeline to an AI thread and cry about how AI isn't accepted by the masses. Hmm, the masses who vote like NPC's, that slurp up Hollykike, that slurp up vidya tripe, that slurp up the absolute garbage from the music industry. What of course happens is say a video is posted in a thread, some music is in the background, said anon likes the music, they ask what it is. A reply says it is AI and the anon asking then is thinking "oh...". This is repeated in any genre. Now, you can understand that someone might prefer something that took months to produce even tho it didn't have to, that employs hundreds of people - even though hit didn't have too. When the likes of Paul McCartney at his advanced age now who hasn't produced anything of note for over 40 years is crying about AI and his shitty contributions to music might be used in a few AI songs and for the training. You only need to go on/mu/ and see the sad reflection of 4chan anons going around in circles talking about music produced 40-50 years ago, what a bunch of boring fags.
>>108873644>the masses will accept AI slopSpambot reverts back to incongruent talking point regurgitation. The cull can't come soon enough.
>>108873655What makes you believe the masses will reject AI slop?
>>108873644The reason is because the slop produced by humans is terrible. Nothing i mnmedia is ofthe standard that came before. If only for the fact AI makes it easier to produce the same standard now it is already better - get slop faster. But the training means it can use the good stuff. When complete trash like the Marvel films that cost 100's of millions are slurped up and AI can produce the same for a fraction of the cost there is no comparison. But why would AI produce rubbish when it can produce anything, 24FPS 481 frames for a 20 sec section in a manner of minutes on a PC at home and that isn't a 5090. Why spend millions on filming trash when it can be bested by some anon using a PC?
>>108873681>broken bot continues shitting out incongruent and generic repliesThe cull can't come soon enough.
>>108873681The reason is that anon is a NPC, he takes the view anything with "AI" in it is a no no. Curious then he made a bee-line to an AI thread discussion in /g/.
>>108873684>spambot replies to its own spam with more irrelevant database talking points
>>108873644AI cultists always want to hand-wave basic limitations like context scaling and Rice's theorem.
>>108873694>spambot replies to its own incongruent spam with another layer of delusions
>>108873706>>108873700>>108873692>>108873655>>108873566sad
>>108873694I know he's been a bad faith faggot this entire time. I personally think he's trolling by leaning heavily into the anti-AI caricature and accusing everyone of being a spambot. Even the most anti-AI person acknowledges the threat of the masses being okay with AI work. That's why artists have such a vitriolic reaction to it
>spambot keeps updooting its own postsTHREADLY REMINDER:Niggercattle will consume worthless slop because it's cheap but niggercattle consumption habits have no bearing on what art is. Niggercattle in general has no bearing on the future. Culling """AI""" slop consoomers is essentially the raison d'etre for automation.
>>108873778It has happened in all forms wit hart. When silent movies came out after the rage over film cameras and paining the stage actors in theatre went hard against anyone joining the movie industry, when talkies came in the same happened again. Classical music reacted when the phonograph was invented "only live performances was real classical music". Now of course AI is an automated process much like when computing was able to solve technical processes in industry that prev only highly skilled people could do. The irony of course is that anything that is produced by humans after AI had taken over the bulk of it will be more highly prized. People will still watch live music performances as AI can't replicate that, people will still want paintings and other human art. The backlash really is the majority of artists who can't produce anything good in the first place, no one will want their slop anymore.
>>108873834post slop
>>108873834A work of art in some medium requires direct, consciousness manipulation of that medium. Your medium involves putting buzzwords in a textbox. You're a "prompt artist".
>>108873804Sorry but the cull of NPC's slurping up slop didn't happen. They happily slurped it up and you of course also did and do that now. The vidya industry producing slop isn't down to AI, it is down to zoomies like you wanting it. Keep enjoying slop, you deserve every last drop.
>>108873852>Your medium involves putting buzzwords in a textbox. You're a "prompt artist"I use AI models on a PC tho. This is like saying a coder is producing slop because they are changing 1's and zero and not physically creating anything. An AI program is simply a tool to produce something. Now if you want a person to hand draw every single frame - 24 frames per second and only that is acceptable then you are a pretentious faggot. "Wow this is so cool, he drew every frame, it may be complete crap, but it's soooo real"
>>108873863>unable to organize events on a timelineYou're either mentally ill or an especially broken bot.
>>108873891>broken spam bot replies incongruently again100% consistent pattern and good job conceding his point.
>>108873891Cope. Visual artists can call each others' medium inferior all they want. I realize prompters desperately want to be part of that game, but you can't because a text box is not a visual medium. The comparison with jeet code monkeys is apt because prompting is roughly in that domain.
>>108869708ai slop is artificial artart^2
In this thread is a pretentious anon who thinks highly of himself, that thinks he knows what "art" is and yet has zero knowledge of how the "masses" reacted to any tech advancement. The archetypal NPC who cries about tech and sings off with 'posted from my iPhone'. An anon on a tech board, zooming to an AI discussion thread. So, a fag who hates all aspects of AI and yet can't stop talking about it and will repeat tis cycle in another AI thread. He will go into any AI thread that shows AI and cry about there isn't a single good AI gen. It's 4chan tho, what else would you expect when there are flat earthers that can't even stick to their /x/ containment board.
>>108869708>being a prompt engineer
>spambot keeps token-guessing about muh masses THREADLY REMINDER: Niggercattle will consume worthless slop because it's cheap but niggercattle consumption habits have no bearing on what art is. Niggercattle in general has no bearing on the future. Culling """AI""" slop consoomers is essentially the raison d'etre for automation.
>>108873930So there it is. The real reason why fags only accept "real art". It's that they can cry about how shitty one piece of art is because they have a face behind it. And the face behind that art can replay and say how the person isn't an artist or if they are they can slag off their art as well. An example away from artis driverless vehicles. Even if the accident rate is a tiny fraction of what it is now it isn't accepted by some, because if there is an accident they can't blame someone aside from the company. they would prefer a jeet driving a truck and killing a whole family over that never happening. Back to art they prefer slop produced by a human mainly because they can cry about how shit it is and they have that face to say "yep, just look at that faggot".
>>108873992I don't know what your mentally ill drivel is about but everything I wrote remains unchallenged.
>>108873996>Cope. Visual artists can call each others' medium inferior all they want. I realize prompters desperately want to be part of that game, but you can't because a text box is not a visual medium. The comparison with jeet code monkeys is apt because prompting is roughly in that domain..It is not a surprise that an anon who has never used a local AI program has zero concepts of how it works. A reminder, better to keep your tongue than let everyone know you are a complete moron Embarrassing himself due to not knowing the very basics of how AI works. This is in addition to pretending to be some sort of expert art critic. your acceptance that the garbage produced now is evidence you are a zoomer.
>>108874028Your psychotic illness causes you to invert reality again. I know how diffusion slop works in minute details. You only know how to shit out buzzwords into a text box.
>>108869708the caveman was right
>>108871061The only harm ai has done to art is artists putting noise filters over their work. Uploading in low resolution only, and deleting their online portfolios. Entirely self inflicted, all to stop some rando from maybe generating some half baked ecchi pictures in a approximate derivative of their drawing style.
>>108873141>proving that jeets don't even know what art meansthnaks
All 4 are true
>>108869708>She
>>108869708Fuck AI and fuck AI Maximalists. May you all burn in hell.
>>108874424> you all burn in hell.no u. roko's basilisk is inevitable, luddite
>>108869954Do you understand how fucking ASS most animation was in the 90s and 80s? You're only thinking of the top tier animations made the best talent in the world at the time. Low budget shit and tv cartoons animations were generally total dogshit, nothing has changed.
>>108874028>i-it's real art I swear! I can type words better than the other guys!!!If you love to type so much then go write a novel instead of being such a bitch.
>>108874454>most of X is le heckin' bad>lowers the standards>most of X is now bad relative to reduced standards
>>108869708>119 replies2 all of you
>>108874434You are Jewish or Chinese.
>>108869708I don't really hate AI art, I just hate that people are using it to produce low quality shit en masse and also attempt to kill jobs with it
>>108874434>roko's basilisk>parroting the braindead """philosophy""" of a guy who doesn't believe diet or exercise will help him lose weight because he is "metabolically disprivileged."
>>108874484loli don't think most people realize that this actually the real definition of "race to the bottom".oh well, this a jeet thread anyway. they wouldn't want to know anyway lol
>>108869708>AI art hate can be perfectly summarized like this>AI slops an image instead of putting any real effort into making an argument
>>108876919> instead of putting any real effort into making an argumentI assure you xe spent a good amount of tokens developing that concept with a language model first.
>>108874454>You're only thinking of the top tier animations made the best talent in the world at the timeThose are the only ones that matter anyway. If we get one Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust in a decade the world is kicking ass as far as I'm concerned.Kids are basically high all the time; they don't need stellar animation. Source: I was there and it didn't matter.
