2026 and firefox doesn't support whitelisting ONLY for cookies, just lets you blacklist, yeah let me just blacklist the entire internet, stupid fucksInsane how behind Mozilla is, and no, the existence of cookie autodelete doesn't make it any better
>>108898963Firefox is a lost cause.
>>108898963By design.It's the main non-Chromium based browser. Google doesn't want it to be real competition to a landscape they own.
>>108899021>It's the main non-Chromium based browser.What about Safari?
>>108899167True, I wasn't thinking of Safari.I mostly meant open source platforms though. (Chrome isn't open source, but Chromium is and it's Google-developed).
>>108899021google doesn't own mozilla
>>108899589Google has had a strong hand in Mozilla's operations for years.
>>108899625chrome doesn't have that feature so be quiet gay little faggot slave
>>108899167Safari is an abysmal excuse for a browser. I'd rather have nothing than that.
>>108899630NTA, but why does this arouse me?
>>108898963>doesn't support whitelisting ONLY for cookiesHow does it not? Is it just librewolf that added that feature? It works on my librewolf install
>>108899648:3
>>108898963I haven't used Firefox in over 10 years but I'm pretty sure it does have this feature actually.
>>108899707it doesn't, best you can do is manually add sites to block from saving cookies which defeats the whole purpose
>>108898963I don't understand. I use Abrowser (Firefox basically) and I just have "Clear cookies and site data every time you close Firefox" and it always deletes all the cookies. I only have whitelisted (exceptions) sites I want to keep the cookies.
>>108899720>>108900812
>>108898963 >>108899720Don't you have this menu in the Settings?t. >>108900812
>>108898963Just automate your logins, use the Firefox password manager.
>>108898963I haven't tried all the various combinations, but the "custom" privacy option lets you block all cookies, while the "manage exceptions" below it lets you either block or allow individual websites. Can't you use them together to get what you want?
>>108898963 >>108899021 >>108899720It does have it. You just add the allowed/whitelisted sites with "Allow" button and after you are done, you press "Save Changes"
>>108900848You don't understand, if somebody is low iq like OP, these features don't exist to them.
>>108898963Just use ai to write your own addons.Gork made me an addon that centralized cookie management for brave.
>>108898963Who's going to pony up a 100k/y salary for the solo dev GOD who will write and maintain a commercial webbrowser?Seriously, a webbrowser developed by more than 10 people is so fucking 'tarded.
>>108900812>>108900825>>108900849That still accepts cookies from everywhere, it doesn't block the ones you don't want, cookie autodelete instantly deletes everything not whitelisted for example
>>108903979What if you block them here (custom privacy) and then whitelist the ones you want in the manage exceptions list?
>>108903979How stupid are you? You can refuse all cookies here and then do as the other anon said and whitelist specific sites.
>>108904049>>108904055how much is google paying you
>>108904069shizo or bait, abandon thread
>>108904124cross site cookies only means specific blacklisted cookies managed by mozilla btw :)
>>108904069I do it for the love of the game.But seriously, I am genuinely curious if this kind of broad blocking + whitelisting actually works given the amount of third party cookies that every site is infested with these days. Which is why I suggested it.
>>108904151it doesan't work, firefox doesn't do what is being asked by default, you need extensions
>>108904171Seems to work fine from my initial tests.
>>108904215works on my machine
>>108904171>firefox doesn't do what is being asked by defaultWhat do you mean? They're not showing up in the "Manage browsing section" at least.
>>108904282*"Manage browsing data" section
>doesn't even fully support passkeys on Linux since they have no OS implementation to leech from>chromium does it itself no problemTruly controlled opposition.
>>108905885>leechno such thing, it's free software
>>108905885>webauthn.iothat sure sounds legitimate
>>108899518Safari uses the exact same engine, they both forked KDE's shitty open source browser and now it's the only one people use. Firefox with it's gecko/quantum is the only alternative. While it also is a controlled opposition. Google literally throws money at them, to make sure some competition exists on paper.
>>108905897>Firefox with it's gecko/quantum is the only alternative.
>>108898988Brave is a literal scam.
>>108903979Oh you are just a troll. I actually tried to help.
