Call me when the loli and shota versions are ready.

File: 20006550_SCR02.jpg (86 KB, 1256x664)

86 KB JPG

>>108903584
Normies won't allow it

>>108903217
Can these things take kigu or would it overheat?

I can make myself a sandwich.

>>108903584
On standby, sir.

>>108904365
Normies lit. sell hardcopies of that game all across the world, it's not a problem.

>>108904375
I think the bigger issue would be is that they can see fuck all through eye slits lol, even putatively totally functional human beings need a carer to walk them around with that gear.

File: IMG_4594.jpg (7 KB, 209x241)

7 KB JPG

>>108903217
>tfw you will never own a robowaifu
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iUOHOtbIWhg&ra=m

>>108904459
The camera wouldn't need to be on the robot itself. It could "see" wirelessly from a cameras/lidar elsewhere on the room. Maybe this wouldn't work "out of the box" with a commercial model such as OP, but is a valid solution for robots that shouldn't leave the room.

>>108903584
Pedo

>>108903217
what does it do though

File: Obiezione!.jpg (24 KB, 250x187)

24 KB JPG

>>108904596
Sure, but we were supposedly talking about an actual product so the fact that it 99% certain has no detachable sensors and is designed to make it hard to mod makes it a moot point.

>>108904663
>were supposedly talking about
Sorry, I butted in on the thread without regard to what we were talking about before. I didn't even watch whatever vid OP linked, oh wait, that faggot didin't.
>an actual product so the fact that it 99% certain has no detachable sensors
Yeah, hence I said it probably wouldn't work on this specific model (or current gen models in general), but conceptually, there's no reason why even a factory robot needs to see only thru it's head and not from security cameras.
>and is designed to make it hard to mod makes it a moot point.
Yeah, that's kikery. Fuck that. Today we can vibehack into shit, I imagine in a few years, it will be even easier (assuming you can keep the illegal infrastructure necessary for vibe DRM circumvention, which is a different battle altogether than robowaifus).

>>108904760
I basically agree, and shops like AliExpress have also done some work putting "pro" tools in the hands of hobbyists and small tradespeople at a much more reasonable cost.
It's better to have stuff that is basically correct OOTB so personally I'm waiting this one out. Roombas work for the kinda house I have, that's my robot for now.

>>108904611
>american robots
they do jack shit

>>108903217
Horrible legs, absolutely disgusting. I admire that they made skinny and feminine robot for once but what’s the point when her legs are so malformed.

>>108905463
Yes. Waiting is the correct move right now. Whoever wants to live on the bleeding edge has nobody but themselves to blame when oops, robowaifu severed yer dick. But I do think kigu is the overlooked obvious solution to the presentation problem. Custom kigu pads can make all sorts of robots look more humane. But for obvious reason kigubots will remain very niche.

>>108903217
>it can make you a sandwich
No it can't unless you are fine eating sandwich with dust and feces.

>>108903217
>Robot Waifu

Maybe the future isn't so bad after all, but I'm still going to wait until Curly Brace becomes a thing IRL.

>>108905803
It can replace an Indian economic migrant's job and not shit in the street at the same time?

>>108903217
>You can't fuck it
for now
we'll get there, give it time

>>108903217
What's the point of an Robot waifu? It isn't any different than hiring a prostitute/escort.
The point is being chosen by a woman and robots can't give you that

File: 1779056135847169.jpg (60 KB, 546x513)

60 KB JPG

>>108903217
>You can't fuck it

>>108905508
that looks like Chinese, sir

>>108906398
>robots can't give you that
begin procedure
call choose(anon)
end

>>108906446
a whore can tell to you she chose you if you pay her. Whats's the difference?

I watched the video and it looks like shit. Unitree recently released a video of their G1 autonomous cleaning a conference room (I guess in answer to Figure's recent demos) and it looked like shit as well. China is really falling behind. For a moment there it really looked like they might be able to compete with the US in robotics.

>>108904498
you can rent them for half an hour
and you will be happy

File: v,v2.jpg (291 KB, 819x1024)

291 KB JPG

Not bad

>>108903217
>buy Extra big panties.
>buy torso onahole.
>put Torso onahole in extra big panties.
>put extra big panties on robot.
>secure panties to robot for thrusting.
>your robot can fuck you now.

>>108906482
The whore leaves when her shift is over. The robot stays.
Jesus, anon. I hope for your sake that you're just baiting.

>>108906239
You only care about Indians because they ruined your precious DEI policies. I hope they will import even more of them.

>>108903584
fpbp

>>108903217
Watched this earlier today. I'm not even a homo, but I was like "damn."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNXsnnSoFxg

What is the state of the art for sexbots nowadays?

File: 1766233122100452.gif (1.31 MB, 200x244)

1.31 MB GIF

>>108903584
>unitree g1 is 127cm tall
you can get one for like 7 grand. that's the thing no one is talking about, smaller robots require less material and are thus cheaper. the epstein class just keeps on winning

File: 1463111903485.jpg (185 KB, 500x633)

185 KB JPG

>>108903217
>You can't fuck it
Then what's the point in buying one?

File: Jeffrey_Epstein_mug_shot_(...).jpg (21 KB, 331x395)

21 KB JPG

>another (probably) AI thread.
/g/ sucks. Most of the threads in this board right now are about AI slop. Maybe 70% are about that.

Where's the Archiving General? The closest thing is private tracker general (I don't really like this), and home server / homelab general which is probably "blah blah blah look at my setup I stuffed 20 HDDs into a NAS box! Weeee!"

>>108903584
Illegal in the USA:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creeper
>CREEPER (Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots), a US Act about sex robots

>>108907528
Something I've been thinking for a while: Jeffrey Epstein kinda looks like a chad. Look at that jaw.

>you can get one for like 7 grand. that's the thing no one is talking about, smaller robots require less material and are thus cheaper. the epstein class just keeps on winning
Yeah, billionaires probably have robololis, since like decades ago.

>>108907110
Means "first post, best post."

>>108908375
Chin and/or jaw

>>108903217
They should make even skinnier one, so skinny they are as thin and tall as adult human skeletons. Then put them inside of silicone sex dolls. That’s all they need to do.

https://i.4cdn.org/wsg/1779776989838398.webm

File: judgementalcat.jpg (109 KB, 730x800)

109 KB JPG

>>108908375
>noo why are you discussing current technology

>>108908857
pretty sure they're just butthurt cause the company seems to be chinese, lels, pathetic

>>108908857
compelling argument, unfortunately it's been completely invalidated by the fact that you posted a cat

>>108903217
>/b/ros
I completely forgot about /b/. Nice to see logposter still at it. YWHW bless.

>>108903217
I understand people are chasing humanoid robots cause of Musk, but cant we just have a small tiny humanoid robot instead? A pocket sized version that is cheap to manufacture and can still give human like reaction/wallk/climb/jump/do task/etc but at a mini scale?

oh my god im about to goon

>>108906767
>crazy American babble

>>108909232
is the word goon associated with mentally ill prudes or something? i bust nuts more than anyone so i call myself a gooner but it gets all the chudclitties leaking

>you didn't mop your disgusting apartment in literal years
>your clanker gf slips on one of your wank rags on the floor
>some grime and send you brought in with your shoes got into one of her butt hinges
>she's now doing really loud grinding and screeching noises whenever she is moving
Well done champ

>>108903217
Can wait to see the guy with a giant controller walk onto the stage when it falls over and he has to stop it

>>108903217
I love how chinese bots send niggers into an ultra seething rage

>>108910745
I love their floor jives, they're hilarious.

>>108908375
>CREEPER
Aww man.

>>108908375
>Most of the threads in this board right now are about AI slop
They are AI slop, not just their subj.
> Where's the Archiving General?
I was probably using other boards back then, but I'll take a wild guess: AI companies used 4chins as crowdsourcing tool to hunt useful stuff to archive for later use in AI training. Once they've run out of anything useful, those threads disappeared, plus most posters are not people, they push agendas, not create cool and noice threads.
> Electronic Pedophilic Robots), a US Act about sex robots
What the fuck? Who thought it was a good idea?
I mean, I understand if it were restricted to registered offenders, it makes sense. Maybe some of them would come clean about their sickness and register, just to buy that shit.
>>108910057
Jokes aside, it's going to be pretty bad. Because people who have strong aversion to everything related to masturbation and porn, would get hooked. I believe there will be an entire caste of people who would claim they are robosexuals or something stupid like that. LGBTQ+R type shit.
Basically teh final blow to demographic growth.

File: 1777204493077258.png (1.62 MB, 1600x950)

1.62 MB PNG

>>108911397
there's still a "library" thread on /x/ and both library threads and archiving threads have always glowed brighter than the sun.

I regularly see datamining threads on the chans too fwiw, there's not just the archive ops.

>>108911397
>Basically teh final blow to demographic growth.
Anywhere online discussion takes place on this subject it's almost universally proclaimed that any potential customers of these were not going to breed anyway.
Win win for me honestly, although by the time they will be properly functional I'll probably be decrepit with 0 libido - still a glorious sight to see future generations of men freed from the pussy jew

>>108911397
>>108911705
I would probably breed more if I had a sex robot, I find sex a bit tiresome and it'd boost my confidence.

>>108907532
>>>/diy/

>>108911397
>blow to demographic growth
Unless fully functional artificial wombs for human babies are created. ("Test tube babies")

>>108911669
>archiving threads have always glowed brighter than the sun.
How?

>>108912233
What are they giving back, what's good about giving randos a copy of your entire archives?
It's just like "freedom of speech" as promoted by a government and just like "free speech forums"; a trap to get people to blow their mouths off.

Not saying that they're all necessarily focused on that primarily (or I wouldn't post here), but it IS a setup for collecting intelligence by design, from the ground up. Not considering that when making a public platform is being a useful idiot.
E.g. a more real "free speech" chan, with a more balanced approach, would have "anon pools" who host their own data and don't share it except by invite. Unlike e.g. lobste.rs, where posting is invite-only but everyone can slurp up the data.

File: official chatgpt personal(...).jpg (241 KB, 1024x1536)

241 KB JPG

>>108903217
Is this going to be the future?

>>108912281
Archiving and sharing stuff related to that does go against privacy, but it's still a worthwhile activity and there's lots to be done and lots to be said about it. (Whether on a small scale or large scale.)

Yes public platforms can act as honeypots to gain info on "dissidents". Their speech is used against them to build profiles on the individual people and so on. I've heard that sites like 4chan are glowie daycare facilities. Another instance of people doing useless jobs as part of the surveillance state (glowies are parasites who steal tax dollars).

>>108912389
There's no "but", the platforms I mentioned are designed as honeypots. It's intrinsic to the form of social organization they promote, sponsor and enable technologically.
There's no dodging this fact, so ig that triggered you to do damage control by bagatellizing the issue while aping me and bringing inane memes to the table. You gotta do better than that to fool me, you fucking retard!

>>108912490
>ig
ignore

>bagatellize
(transitive, rare) To regard as a bagatelle; to play down, trivialize or belittle.

Our values differ. I care more about archiving, you care more about privacy. I care not to convince you into something.

No I'm not mimicking you.

>>108912578
Rather, "convince you of something"

On the topic of archiving, anyone want a torrent of 1,105,578 full images from 4chan? I have a torrent of it that I can share on a "limited basis".

inb4, "you have a secret plan to use it as a honeypot, write down and share all the IP addresses, blah blah blah schizobabel."

>>108908375
>Where's the Archiving General?
Here: >>108914628

>>108911084
I made that joke before.

CaptainSparklez made this "Fallen Kingdom" video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-sH53vXP2A

Later on, someone made a parody of that video, also showing Minecraft gameplay. This parody video was in YouTube some years ago. It was probably deleted / censored. I remember the Minecraft gameplay in said video showed a sign with the text "niggerbaby" written on it.

Anyone else remember this video? Another piece of lost media, I guess.

>>108903217
>Walking Chinese murder bot in my house
Let me know when it's FOSS

>>108908375
>Illegal in the USA:
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creeper
>CREEPER (Curbing Realistic Exploitative Electronic Pedophilic Robots), a US Act about sex robots
Why do they pass dumb shit like this but when a bill comes up that would ban child marriage in a state that has it, they vote it down every time?

File: 2DEll.png (62 KB, 1024x768)

62 KB PNG

>>108915129
Approved by The House, but not The Senate?

>thehill.com/homenews/house/392357-house-approves-ban-on-sex-dolls-that-resemble-children/
>The House approved a measure this week that would ban the importation of sex dolls & robots that resemble children.
>Rep. Dan Donovan's [Creeper Act] passed by a voice vote [...] It now heads to the Senate for consideration.
>The bill blocks the importation & transportation of anatomically correct childlike dolls, mannequins or robots "intended for use in sexual acts."
>The figures are shipped from China, Hong Kong & Japan,[...]often purchased online by pedophiles[...]
>"Once an abuser tires of practicing on a doll, it's a small step to move on to a child," Donovan said. "My bill takes necessary steps to stop these sickening dolls from reaching our communities."
>The bill says the dolls "normalize submissiveness & normalize sex between adults & minors."
>"Child sex dolls are anatomically accurate renderings of young children, & include accessories like false eyelashes, wigs, warming devices, & cleaning tools," according to the statement.
>House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte[...:] the concept of the childlike sex dolls makes his stomach turn.
>"These dolls can be programmed to simulate rape," Goodlatte said. "The very thought makes me nauseous."
>[...]social scientists argue that child sex dolls may reduce pedophilia & child sexual abuse but there is no scientific evidence to prove that.
>"To the contrary, these dolls create a real risk of reinforcing pedophilic behavior & they desensitize the user causing him to engage in sicker and sicker behavior," Goodlatte said.
>The United Kingdom has a similar law to the one proposed by Donovan.
>"In fact, of the 128 dolls seized in the UK, 85% percent of the men who imported them were also found in possession of child pornography," according to a statement from Donovan's office.
also: narsol.org/2018/01/creeper-act-would-turn-law-abiding-americans-into-sex-offenders/

cont
>concept of a child sex doll disgusts most ordinary people. [...] unsurprising that experts believe these dolls are being purchased not by ordinary people but by pedophiles; those whose sexual attraction to prepubescent children is anything but ordinary[...]it is not illegal to be a pedophile just as it is not illegal to have other disgusting thoughts—unless you act on those thoughts by breaking the law
>This is just as well, because if it was illegal simply to be a pedophile, that would mean criminalizing up to 8 million Americans, which would more than double the existing population of felons. Since experts believe that pedophiles don't choose to be attracted to children, it also seems unfair to criminalize them for what may be an unwanted condition, especially since most of them never go on to abuse a child
>While CREEPER would not make all pedophiles into instant sex offenders, it would do so for purchasers of child sex dolls. One of the justifications that its proponent gives for the Bill is the claim that 85% of those found with sex dolls in the United Kingdom also had possession of illegal child pornography [fictional or nonfictional in UK]
>But that means that 15% of them didn't, and that we would be criminalizing them for possession of what is, essentially, a masturbation aid. And since when is possession of something that is merely correlated with illegal activity separately punishable? Even though there is a correlation between those who purchase miniature ziplock bags and those who sell drugs, the possession of ziplock bags is not illegal; nor should it be.
>In fact, the use of child sex dolls by pedophiles may actually reduce sex offending. The current scientific consensus is that pedophila is a lifelong condition that cannot be cured, but can be managed in ways that don't harm children. For some pedophiles, sex dolls may be one such harmless outlet.
>[...]
>Jeremy Malcolm is the Senior Global Policy Analyst for the Electronic Frontier Foundation

File: 878-8788996_crushinator-f(...).jpg (158 KB, 820x815)

158 KB JPG

>>108903217
Hmm missed opportunity.. Body even too big for customisation.

File: 2827d039f1a44b19adac88181(...).jpg (98 KB, 896x1200)

98 KB JPG

Nah Eva.i is the real one. Its finaly happening!

>>108916662
think about the potential for datamining AND doxing

File: 00.jpg (38 KB, 640x519)

38 KB JPG

>>108911705
>any potential customers of these were not going to breed anyway
Rubber doll is one thing. But when it's a robot that sounds like a human (tech is already there), it's different. You just turn off the light off you go, no difference.
Also it's not the "oh it's the same" part that makes it dangerous. It's the part where it is literally better than a real thing, at least in some isolated aspects. I don't know much about it, but you just go to /jp/ or something and ask around, anons will explain to you what modern masturbation devices can do to a man. That go to /aicg/ over here, check out what they have to say. Then imagine perfecct voice, attractive characted and a certain technology behind robot's legs combined into one uniform device.
It's a fucking civilization ender.

>>108917626
didn't buy an onahole, won't be buying a robotic onahole either, I'm affraid I'm the last non retard human inmune to shitty propaganda

>>108915551
>For some pedophiles, sex dolls may be one such harmless outlet.
at first i thought that said politicians instead
>>108917626
addiction is a weird and wonky topic and shit like self-fulfilling prophecies only makes it worse in regards to masturbation and fetishes, but, u got a point there. well, almost. the big issue for civilisation ending sex toys at the moment is the ease of access for the "smart" kind.
lets say i have experience in this and i got a feeling the vast majority of people interested in this stuff would be too computer illiterate, and you'd need a VR hmd, expensive sex toy, and maybe also a gaming pc if you're going for some vam action.
so far though, the shit is insane in the membrane if you know what you're doing, have the patience to learn multiple different fields (it's sort of like programming and animation to make your own vam scenes, and possibly sculpting too if you wish to make your own "perfect attractive character") and also the hardware as mentioned to run this shit. a near perfect character staring at you while also glancing around your room is already unreal and ive barely touched any of the ai stuff 'cause that's a whole 'nother graphics card
protip: id be mindful of your girth as you may tear apart onaholes or simply be too long for them to be any use.

>>108915515
>>108915551
Fine. I'll stick to real children then.

File: output.mp4 (1.27 MB, 576x1024)

1.27 MB MP4

>>108918150
Jeffrey I thought you were fukcing dead! How are you my man?
>>108917984
>ease of access
You just buy it, swap batteries and such. Also you're talking about VR, which is different. Again, haven't tried any of that, but from what I've seen it's very glitchy and causes confusion because of tactile and visual components are out of sync. Robots fix exactly that.

>>108918270
Fake news. I've been shitposting here all this time. Come on, let's go make fun of chuds over at my favorite board, /pol/.

>>108903217
usecase for bipedal robots exept falling ?

>>108918270
are u an ai or a chink (both soulless) or whatever mystery meat because what you just said doesn't correspond to the subject that well that it's concerning i dont think whatever just posted that doesn't realize what was posted what the fuck it posted to
im not going to point out how fucking astonishing this post is. it's bizarre. it's outstanding. it's sliced bread so much so i can believe it's butter sans not no toast butter buns baked. but anyways it's my ticket outta here

>>108918340
this nigga thinks, BUT the answer is generic human replacement, aka it can 'do' many things a human can, if you want to do one thing, you don't need a bipedal at all, same deal with car factory robots do not look human, they are optimized 2 do teh thing, and that's what define its phisycal properties

File: IMG_0349.jpg (403 KB, 828x582)

403 KB JPG

>>108906398
>what’s the point of a superior more beautiful version of women that don’t have the negatives of women or prostitutes