ITT: Worst languages for anything other than personal pet projects/individually tailored microutilities
>>108905361gaelic
>>108905361Perl
>>108905361Zig. Solid language but changing too much
>>108905361Python
>>108905361Turing
Lua
Pretty much any esoteric language, "your language, but worse" (zig etc), anything that uses JVM / .NET
>>108905361Elisp
>>108906426to be fair there probably are people who would pay for Magit if the devs ever decided to go that route
>>108906450I do not config a single fileI do not learn key bindingsand if my basic bitch factory reset corporate workflow fails I kill myself
>>108905406This for real>you just need to know what the 50 loaded modules in this script do and their subcommandsLanguage is straight up unreadable
>>108905361rust
>>108905361Harehttps://dmpwn.info/
Functional programming languages
>>108905361Python. Really, not good for anything serious.
>>108906941The real fun begins when one module starts monkey-patching another.What the code in the file says and what the code does at runtime can become two completely different things.
>>108905361Bourne shell and I love ithope a Lisp gets this useful for me some day
>>108907577Lisp is LARP. AI's already making it obsolete for the very niche thing it was ever good for.