https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VucjurQUHO8
>>108906876>AGIIt's an auto complete ffs.Is no one explaining this to the retards who make these decisions?Is no one explaining this to the CEOs who go and spew out this nonsense?
I'm not watching this. He looks like he loves to get pegged.
>>108906912I'm sure you would know.
>>108906912I've watched it and downloaded the AVC1 1080 because it's the truth.
>>108906876>I'm absoltely flabbergasted to find out that David Deutsch, the father of quantum computing [...], doesn't even believe animals are intelligent or conscious.>Like I'm sitting here trying to determine if a python script can be generally intelligent and this man is like "dogs aren't even alive".>If there are cases being made that animals aren't intelligent, then how the fuck we having a conversation about wether computers are intelligent?>Or what the fuck it would mean for them to be generally intelligent?>There are no definitions for any of these terms that we are claiming exists or is even possible.>There is fuckng nothing.>AGI is some sort of materialist propaganda wet dream bullshit.>The worst part is that it's not even clear what problem AGI would solve. Like why would you need AGI to do a coding task? Why would you need general intelligence to do that?>What does that offer on top of current generation LLMs?>In fact for things like coding you don't want generality. You want the opposite. You want specialization.
>>108906876Who?
>>108906876who is this person and why should we care?
>>108907311>The mid-level engineer on your team who's been working in your codebase for 10 years writes a lot better code than a PhD level engineer who you just hired who isn't familiar with your code.>It's about carrying the whole thing in your head for many, many years. It's about specializing in that specific code base.>The problem with LLMs today, the reason they suck balls at coding is they can't hold a damn thing in its tiny ass head.>And the whole thing not even being the codebase itself, but the codebase in all the intangibles and the whole business context and the politics and the reason your stuckup designer will literally quit if you change the color of the button. It's fucking impossible.>LLMs by definition are doomed to fail in a codebase.>And what the fuck problem would AGI solve here? It's a fucking context problem. It's a fucking understanding problem. It's a being engrossed problem. soaking yourself in the universe of the problem you're trying to solve.An AI cannot do that. An AI cannot understand or feel or soak or engross.>David Deutsch argues that because they seem to have arrived in a package at once in the form of a human that it doesn't even make sense to separate intelligence from consciousness and personhood.
>>108907313Quantum computing is a true grift though, unlike AI which is only 50% a grift. Quantum advantage hasn't been demonstrated on any useful algorithms yet and there currently isn't any path to that occurring despite massive investments over decades.
>>108907316>>108907323The speaker for /g/ and all based anti-aiers out therehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doI1GYZ7r-w
>>108907347it cracks RSA dude
>>108906890>redditor thinks he knows more than the people worth a trllion dollarsanon they know exactly what it is and how it functions. you're not smart. you don't have a unique view or knowledge.
>>108906890What is it trying to autocomplete and why can't it autocomplete itself?
I hate this piece of shit. I don't know how many time I clicked on the do not show me this trash button on youtube but they keep trying to shill him. I hope the robots kill him so I don't have to see his stupid face ever again.
>>108907413more money than sense
>>108907406Oh wow! That's why all cryptocurrency has been hacked and is owned by hackers how! It's also why all online banking is results in losing all your money! Think for a second, dude. Or better yet use Google. Even a microscopic RSA2048 key has NEVER been cracked by a quantum computer. A quantum computer has NEVER performed an end to end (Input-output) prime factorization faster than a conventional computer.
>>108907488but muh media headlines!!
>>108906890When you catch a baseball with your dad, or kiss a girl, or walk beside her hand in hand, all of that is prediction world modeling done by your cerebellum to compensate for the lag between when you see something and when that signal reaches your brain.You are auto-complete.
>>108907488That's because it is based on a fundementally flawed understanding of quantum states and the nature of reality.This universe is not a simulation in any relvent sense, or holographic. It is far more advanced that that. It is a very optimised structure and it's puropse is to host life, uniquely so. In fac wihou life this universe enters statis. It is a created thing and deliberately so, the casual chain encapusulated in the singularity was made. When it was created spacetime commenced as an executable only has a measure of time local to it when executed. We know the system clock rate, planks constant this indicates the that underlying computational system is optical. When time commenced inn the singularity (theer is no infinite regression because you cannot have any causal chain without time commencing) it did what all instruction sets do, allocated memory and expanded. However in terms of effeciency it makes no sense to render or realise any information other than a gravitational framework. Black holes are simply decalloocation mechanisms, null pointers. It is not that the cat is dead or alive, or that both states exist at once, only thye gravational and other pertinnent metadata is stored and the cat rendered whe the box is opened. It does not exist undtil that moment. This is optimal, once rendered the object maintains ha state, it is not rerendered should the box be opened again. by a different viewer. However, the cat simply does not exist. The entire purpose of the unverse is to host life, it would seem in particular us. Unimaginable effeort and intellegence created it. that was outside of space time. Not simply in other dimensions that have been demonstrated via theorms, no they are the shadows of the underlying optical mechanism, the shadows of it's storage mechanisms must probably. There is no dark matter, or dark energy, it is simply unrendered and metadata frameworks for gravitational effect. Rendered mass has high compuaional cost
>>108907727As does rendered energy, both are entirely interchangeable. The high compuationnal cost of large mass in fact causes lag near it (slows time) this is why it bends light. This is no more than the underlying computational load manifesting and a reason most of teh universe is unrendered, this is simple effeciency. This is why distant spiral galaxies do not move as expected, not because dark matter exists but becaus ethey are only effected by gravitational metadata frameworks and not rendered mass. If I am correct than an astronomer should find a gravitational lensing effect that does not emit baryons, this would be the proof experimentally of what I have explained here even though I am quite sure of this. I would always have hated to win a nobel prize or debate any of this. It is all mathematically demonstrable and unlike any other unifying theory relying on quantum theory, sytring theory or anything else it fully and mathematically explains the entire know universe as well as the mathematics of additional deimensions and the role of black holes and why they behave as they do. I am in Ireland, my work is the logical progression of Georges LeMaitre and St. Thomas Acquinas and I attribute all credit to the magesterium of the Catholic churchThe Purpose of the universe? You are the purpose of the universe. Not just that but you are intrinsically vital to its operation You may wonder about free will. You can do anything at any time but the ulttimate end result will always be the same in the causal chain.
>>108907413Billionaires (and most people in power) are fucking stupid. If you've held a job you'd know this.
>>108907323Former musclecat who overdosed on steroids and has now returned to the snailcat life.If you've ever used Standard Notes, that was him. He's apparently working on a chat app now, while also running a Youtube where he calls out the shitty direction software engineering is going.
>>108906876Marc Andreessen has a friend on Wall Street who picked up coding with AI and generated 500,000 lines of code.FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND LINES OF CODEAnd you're telling meyou're telling meAI IS A GRIFT?do you understand just how skilled of a programmer you have to be to generate 500,000 lines of code?no you don'tMarc Andreessen does (and his friend on Wall Street)WE have engineers who are generating ten to TWENTY times more LINES OF CODEandand yu're telling me AI isn't the future...yu have to be kidden me
Everyone who has ever known me irl calls me a genius. I am now a recluseNothing I posted is skitzobabble, ot is all quite correct and I have extensive mathematical proofs.
>>108907810Funny you mention him.https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/marc-andreessen-mocked-ai-works
>>108907811Bigfoot touched my penis. Please help me with your intelligence.
>>108907832goodbye
>>108906890It being auto complete just tells you nothing one way or another.If it auto completed "The proof of the Riemann Hypothesis is: ..." that would be amazing. If it auto completed every sentence the same way Newton would, that would be amazing. Or if it just auto completed every code base the same way a very good programmer does.You may say it can't do that, but that's not because it's auto complete.
>>108906876>>108907348buy an ad
>>108907348I'm sorry but if you are anti-AI you shouldn't be on /g/ at all.
>>108907802>shitty direction software engineering is goinglol this is so far beyong "going" it is shit. That fuckhead probably makes electron bullshit. there are no native applications now either. fuck these retards!
>>108907772>>108907727Very interesting, a lot of this (from what I can follow) is very similar to the hermetica. Where can I read more about your points?
>>108907413>>108907467>>108907500>>108908624>business bros telling me I'm wrong and espousing sophistry
>>108906876ultimately, luddies are just low iq.
>>108906876this was one of his more incoherent videos
My fucking god the absolute state of this board
>>108908690This isn't your personal hugbox
>>108907772Why exactly would a higher mass make the computation more expensive? And as a follow up question how would bend that light ?
this guy is such a grifter. he has that stupid fucking video where he cried about now that llm's are a thing there's no "art" to "computer science". he's used that momentum to do tech react videos and cry about ai. the current meta is shitting on ai so this video will get a million views
>>108910375In some cases its even worse. Recently saw a shitpost of mine here on /g/ screencapped and posted on twitter only to then later again see a thread here made with a screencap of the tweet of the screencap of my shitpost.
