[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Osx10.0cd.jpg (65 KB, 500x497)
65 KB JPG
remember MacOS X "Cheetah" back in 2001 uncs?
was it really that revolutioary?
>>
>>108907843
It wasn't but it was miles ahead of the dogshit that was Mac OS 9.2.2 in terms of performance and stability.
>>
>>108907843
I was 3 in 2001 but the Cheetah name makes it sound like it would have been a German WWII tank so I think it probably was pretty based
>>
https://youtu.be/dHrVGk0WwYM?t=385

If you didn't live through that era, I don't know if you can get a full sense of it.

Though I don't think OSX really took off until it got Exposé and Quicklook. Much of the changes up to then were under the hood, and visually one would argue was just rearranging the interface and making it pretty.
>>
>>108907843
MacOS was never not a usability nightmare
>>
>>108907843
I was a Windows enjoyer when Cheetah came out
My first Mac that was my own as an adult ran 10.2, not 10.0 (Cheetah)
>>108908204
yeah, 10.3 was _way_ better than 10.2
command-tab stopped being whatever the fuck it was and it moved to a stack like alt-tab on Windows
>>
>>108907843

Yes.
Even today people cant get sound to work on Linux.
>>
>>108907843
I remember seeing it booting on my friends new laptop, it was slow as hell.
>>
>>108910623
Sound was never a trouble in BeOS, which is also POSIX based.

But instead of getting bailed out by Microsoft, they got killed by Microsoft because they couldn't allow something so obvious superior to Windows to exist.
>>
>>108908004
This.

>>108908315
You probably game all day on nu-Windows, the biggest usability nightmare of the past two decades.
>>
>>108910903
It was even considered by apple as their new OS, before Jobs came back in and sold them NeXT.
>>
I don't know. It was on my school computers, but we only used them to run this edutainment game that teaches you how to type with the keyboard covered so you can't see the keys. Actually, I realized I owe it entirely to that class the fact that I'm able to type fast without looking at the keyboard.

I assumed everyone had to take that class as a kid, until I realized that most people at a keyboard hunt and peck.
>>
>>108907843
>>108908004
>revolutionary
Yes, but it didn’t really get good until 10.3. The prior versions, especially op picrel, were unstable, and most users relied at least a little on the classic environment layer/partition until 10.3. I’d say the ui was probably the most desirable thing about it upon launch, besides everything underneath moving away from the dog shit os 8-9 environment.
>>
>>108907843
>remember MacOS X "Cheetah" back in 2001 uncs?
Yes, but I didn't use it personally. I used Macs in the 80s and at college in late 90s, but was otherwise a "windows with linux on the side" PC user (today it's 99% Linux, 1% Windows).
>was it really that revolutioary?
Yes but mostly within the Apple ecosystem itself. It was widely recognized as a major turning-point and a new direction for Apple Computers. Lots of people talked about it, even if few people were actually using it yet. The switch to the Unix-based system under the hood was a really big deal and the Aqua UI was very appealing. But it took a good 5 more years for Apple to really establish themselves as the "premium" laptop/electronics vendor for women and soidevs (Linux distros started trying to copy the Mac UI in the late 2000s).

My impression also was that the Mac OS releases during this period (Cheetah, Puma, Panther etc) weren't as big a deal on their own. They were mostly treated like incremental updates and upgrades (even if Apple would market as if each one was a mind-blowing and groundbreaking achievement).
>>
no one cared. absolutely no one used macos before ipods. in terms of marketshare it was where linux was 10 years ago
>>
>>108911459
> My impression also was that the Mac OS releases during this period (Cheetah, Puma, Panther etc) weren't as big a deal on their own. They were mostly treated like incremental updates and upgrades (even if Apple would market as if each one was a mind-blowing and groundbreaking achievement).
No, the early versions were all pretty groundbreaking. The incremental update releases started happening after 2007. Leopard was the last truly big release.
>>
>>108911241
to be fair, as much as i love BeOS/Haiku, steve also sold them Steve Jobs, whereas Gassee was just not CEO material. He was native to Apple, and BeOS to me did feel more 'Mac OS' than early OS X, charming and friendly but very understatedly so while OS X was just too 'in your face' and it ran like ass on my G3 at the time. But without Jobs there'd have been no iPod and Apple would have died a computer company.
>>
>>108912907
Yeah I agree that it was a no go. I think Be boxes could have sold modestly well without Microsoft's sabotage and become a niche product.
>>
no games
>>
File: file.png (245 KB, 328x512)
245 KB PNG
>>108913060
>>
File: file.png (382 KB, 512x512)
382 KB PNG
>>108913076
>>
File: file.png (321 KB, 512x512)
321 KB PNG
>>108913086
>>
>>108907843
Mac OS hasn't been revolutionary since the System 7 days
Where Windows is built upon decades of legacy cruft for the sake of backwards compatibility, Mac OS is built entirely on the idea of rebuilding from scratch design decisions made decades ago for reasons that no longer make sense
Mac OS X was just yet another instance of massive changes under the hood. Usability wise it's the exact same as you're still drag-n-dropping to install apps and kernel extensions, creating symlinks everywhere, and having to deal with the batshit insane default mounting behaviour just like previous Mac OS versions. The biggest addition was minor compatibility with some existing *nix tools like CUPS and a proper command line.
>>
>>108913076
goodness gracious, that is a lot of serial ports.
>>
>>108907843
I was 17 years old. Yes, I remember. I installed it on my clamshell iBook G3. Like someone else said it was slow (but my machine was old). But it was extremely stable. In those days, software would randomly crash, systems would randomly hang, and you kept saving ever 2 minutes just in case such an event would happen. Not so with OS X. It took windows years to catch up. And since OS X was Unix, when I started university in 2004 I could ssh in remotely from my own OS X into the Solaris systems of my university, and run their Matlab and other software on my own iBook, over X.

It really was great and that revolutionary. Thank you for reminding me, OP.
>>
>>108911295
I never took that class and I can type fast without looking at a keyboard, have been able to since I was a kid
People are just weak-brained
>>
>>108907843
It was Unix with a Candy UI. Maybe not "revolutioary" but it did help Apple win back market share.
>>
>>108910623
been using tux for over 15 years, never had any audio issues in my life, nice bait
>>
File: IMG_9276.jpg (7 KB, 250x187)
7 KB JPG
>>108907843
Unfortunately, I bought a G3 iBook with like 128MB of RAM and I just remember it being slow as fuck. My first impressions weren’t great. A buddy of mine had a G3 Powermac with 2GB of ram and like double the clock speed and it was faster than XP.

Laptops always suck
>>
File: 2012-11-27-puck.png (174 KB, 777x518)
174 KB PNG
Here's your mouse. It only has one button.
>>
>>108914333
Idiots might confuse left from right. Just one button solves it. Another brillant idea from Steve!
>>
>>108914342
Apple mice have had one button since 1984 and that was the concern back then
>>
File: 1779336672418129.jpg (121 KB, 600x525)
121 KB JPG
>>108907843
I didn't buy gay cds but I had this
>>
File: apple unix ad 2002.jpg (401 KB, 1976x1202)
401 KB JPG
>>108907843
OSX was revolutionary as it was the first Unix that normal people can use for a price normal people can afford. (Before anyone says Apple is too expensive: iMac G3 500MHz: $1000. SGI O2 350MHz: $7500.) Sure, there was the option of Linux, but it was still rough and poorly supported. It took years of work to become a fully viable option as it is now.
>>
File: promouseibook2.jpg (55 KB, 767x922)
55 KB JPG
>>108914333
>>108914342
One button is too much. Have a mouse with NO button!
>>
No, they just finally took Mac OS into a modern age.
The memory management was dogshit terrible prior to OS X, you had to tell programs how much memory to use.
Guess over and it's wasted memory, under and your program crashes.
If it doesn't crash already for a myriad of other reasons because holy shit that system had so many bolt ons to stay "modern" System 7's versioningnwasna fucking joke.
Steve Jobs finally came in, said fuck it, brought on Next and Systems 8 and 9 were damage control with still the underlying issues in the architecture since the 80s.
>>
>>108914584
Mac OS 8 was also a way to end the licensed Mac clones.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macintosh_clone#Licensed_clones
>>
>>108907843
https://youtu.be/4Srtrfe0nP0

It defined a generation of colorful and expressive GUI design aesthetics that still stands the test of time. And this is coming from someone who's only been a Windows user all his life.
>>
>>108908315
>>108914333
>>108908419
based

>>108915391
>It defined a generation of laggy superficial slop to appeal to normiefags over the peak utilitarian kino that was w9x
cringe
>>
>>108908031
i kept thinking of a cheetah thong because at the time, i had a massive fetish for women wearing cheetah thongs
still do, actually.
>>
>>108914485
more like “almost _all_ button”
>>
File: 1763074739154691.gif (511 KB, 620x187)
511 KB GIF
>>108915391
>that still stands the test of time
osx and macos is, was, and always will be steaming heap of shit made for manchildren
you literally have to have the mentality of a child to think this trash looks good, to say nothing of the abysmal anti-usability design of this trash toy OS
buttons should have a fixed position, always
that's basic usability 101 taught for decades
jeets at crapple can't even understand basic level shit like this and they still don't understand it
all they know how to do is appeal to brain dead normieniggers who think animations that lag down their already slow slop OS makes makes it fancy and futuristic
>>
>>108907843
I miss the original few UI's of OS X starting with Cheetah, disliked everything since Panther.
>>
>>108907843
Mac OS and Windows where always terrible.
>>
>>108907843
every OS is terrible
>>
>>108915881
dock zoom is from 10.0 and it’s not on by default
and AFAICT the hit targets are still the same no matter how big the icons get zoomed to — they’re just bigger so if you have tiny icons and bad eyesight you can see what you’re about to click on
>>
>>108914342
He wasn't wrong, to this day boomers still have trouble with two button mice. Tell them to click and they'll ask "left or right?"
>>
The actual architectural work was done with Mac OS X Server and Rhapsody.
>>
I vaguely remember the pretty (for its time) UI, that's about it.

>>108910623
Haven't had any audio issues on Linux since my shitty little Chromebook with Ubuntu, 13 years and 3 laptops ago. Haven't really had many issues at all since ditching Ubuntu for Fedora, then moving to CachyOS a month ago.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.