Is there any service provider that you guys could recommend for thoroughly removing your personal information from online? There's all kinds of sites that have personal information about everyone, like their name, dob, address, emails, etc, and it makes me uncomfortable that my information is on there, especially since im in the process of getting a career where I have to deal with people with poor moral compassesThanks
I've seen the services but never used 'em sry
>>108909126There are none.
Never tried them incogni.com
these services remove them from easy public view (meaning : a google search with you name) your actual data as kept by big corpos will never be deleted and might be used against you in the futuresorry but there's no escaping the based life
>>108909126They're all scams and most data brokers don't even remove your data. They simply mark it as "not visible" when people search for your name. Best option is to go through the main ones yourself and call it a day: https://pastebin.com/cDbDXQvh
>>108909516Thanks
>>108909126Yeah. Go back 20+ years and stay tf off social media.
>>108909126You mean you want to give all of your logins to a single provider? Wouldn't that just add one company/website to the list?
>>108910042It doesn't matter, your info is still put into a searchable database if you live in the US where anyone can find all your info if they know a combination of a couple details about you already
>>108909516>https://pastebin.com/cDbDXQvhthose are just a small sample of data brokers. bigger sample:databrokerswatch.org
>>108909126If you live in California, on 1 August, 2026, data brokers will be required to check a list at the California Privacy Protection Agency, and if you added your name to the list (you cannot yet), the data broker must a) not sell your data, and b) if you selected this option, also must delete your data. The brokers must check the list no less than every 45 days.https://cppa.ca.gov/data_brokers/
>>108910168That should be in every state, imo
>>108909126kanary's fine, but if you're a homeowner, there's no getting away from it without legal structures (trusts)otherwise, stay off social media
>>108909151>these services remove them from easy public viewthat is still valuable if you have a stalker, are on witness protection, have a secret second family, etc
>>108910216why are youtube grifters now repeating their ad script here?if those services have to advertise on some grifter's channel, they have no value and are a grift themself.
>>108910055You dont give them your logins, you give them your home address, mailing address, phone number and email address so they can get it unlisted from public background check websites. When you google search a normalgoy's name it will show you their address, age, known associates and all kinds of stuff. Incogni et al mitigate that. Again the use case is for stalkers, witness protection, living a double life, etc, NOT corporate or government surveillance. Jeffery Epstein probably uses something like Incogni.
>>108910304Just because somethings a grift doesnt mean theres no use case for anybody
>>108910182California makes the policy for the nation. California made age verification OS level, and everyone abided. Globally. Why? First sentence. Can't wait for white CA summer. Been a while. Two decades. But we play the long game. Future Capital of the nation btw.
>>108910447>Future Capital of the nationwhich one
>>108910588Fuck off with your slop, ranjeet.
>>108910588Lol, it's true
yeah you should contact the sales rep at Palantir
>>108909126I’ll do it for you. What’s your name?
>>108912324Christian Weston Chandler
>>108909126I heard good things about Optery.
>>108910467East Japan. California becomes the largest island in Japan. We already grow the rice they eat. We will adopt a new, neo feudal samurai lifestyle with technology and nature.
>>108910163You don't need to worry about the smaller ones because they are just selling access to the dozen or so primary data brokers.
>>108909126I would not trust it at all.
