>iOS 26.6 beta 1 will show an alert if you’ve reached the blocked contacts limit, suggesting you remove blocked contacts in Settings before adding new ones.>via MacRumors
>>108916715does anyone apart from women block people? is people texting you that scary?
>>108916748Bots though?>>108916715So you can't block all the bots you want. Let me guess, it's going to cost me extra?
What's the limit? Why is there a limit?
>>108916781Storage is expensive. We need to store 150MP photos on the device.
>limitless contacts>blocks are limitedWhat kind of retarded DB structure are they using?
>>108916715My next phone will be a chink android with camera covers because of shit like this
>>108916771>it's going to cost me extra?monetizing not seeing ads/spam has been a thing for a while now. telecom companies are in on the scam.
>>108917059i just use duct tape. gorilla tape comes off clean when i need to use the camera.
>>108916715I'm sorry but you are frickity fucking fucked if you genuinely reach a "blocked contacts" limit. It's not just a database issue, it's a (You) issue. Stop. Blocking. People.
>>108916748Hideki Kamiya
>>108917686>it's a (You) issue. Stop. Blocking. People.this. Blocking Indian call centers is a blasphemy
>>108916715Maybe it has to be done on the cell modem or something? Anyway, it's easier to just block everyone who isn't in your address book, rather than doing it number by number.
>>108916715The bigger news is that iPhones in the UK require ID to even use it. Fuck is that nonsense? So glad I'm not stuck in apples bullshit eco-dungeon.
>>108916715The absolute worst type of women will seethe so hard about this.
The strange thing here is actually that you can only block contacts, not numbers. It's weird and annoying.>>108917761Would you create a contact for pajeet2131 and block it? They use new numbers each time.Anyway this is solved with call screening, they remove you from the spam call lists when you use it.>>108917878Yes. There's no usecase for more than 10 blocked CONTACTS.