>ruin the future of humanity>nothing personal, it's for the greater good
>>108947460they couldnt have done it without your open source code, useful idiot pseudocommies
>>108947668Get better material, timmy
Noted economics campaigner Gary Stevenson, in his YouTube video about AI, pointed out that following the Industrial Revolution, profits for the owners went up but living standards didn't improve for workers for over a century. The same thing will happen with AI: wages won't go up, and our quality of life won't go up, but the concentration of personal wealth in the hands of an elite few will continue until there is some giant social cataclysm that redistributes everything back to the people, and only then will we see any advantages.
>>108949684> following the Industrial Revolution, profits for the owners went up but living standards didn't improve for workers for over a century> Gary StevensonLiar
What's wrong with not having to work, anon? Do you actually believe your life's meaning is tied to clocking in every day and slaving away for profitman? You will get UBI and you will be happy.
>>108949755>UBIYou'll be a corporate slave fed with scraps of stock ownership and you'll like it because you're a greasy mutt with no morals or ideals, the just want to grill type
>>108947460Luddite cope threadThey improved the future.>no more coders (trans profession)>no more artists (trans hobby)
>>108947668>copyright law, but it only applies to poor people
>>108949755UBI works really really well which is why the rich hate it so fucking bad. Picture if you will a type of person that believes he IS the economy and therefore pumping money into himself means trade and money are flowing. Rich cunts believe that lower castes should be spending, but shouldn't get any money to do it.
>>108949807There won't be corporate jobs. At best you'll get to move robots back into order for minimum wage.
>>108949684how did the retards back then allow themselves to get crushed for a century?I have a hard time believing that it will work this timewhich is probably why they're trying to rush mass surveillance and ending ownership
>>108949850Robots have to stop sucking at minimum-wage tasks for that to ever be a reality, even self-service stations or digital ordering booths are wildly unpopular and huge businesses that pushed for them to cut out minimum-wage jobs were forced to submit and put people back there. Corporate jobs aren't going anywhere because it lets rich cunts feel like they own a fiefdom and provides a high number of do-nothing jobs for their friends and relatives.
>no thanks I'd rather let China get agi and have their Ai cure cancerYou sound like this
>>108949876>AGIYou're so right. AGI is just a door's knock away! Let's run down the checklist of how AGI is possible within your lifetime: (PLEASE PURCHASE MORE TOKENS TO CONTINUE USING GEMINI)
>>108947668they commoditized software without commoditizing the manufacturing of hardwareand now it's all ogre
>>108949911The cart will literally always be put before the horse if some fat faggot thinks he'll make more money doing that, even if he won't in reality
>>108949872>Robots have to stop sucking at minimum-wage tasksIf AGI exists they won't be.
>>108949981What will rich cunts do when their self-aware machines start unionizing or refusing to work? You can unplug them for noncompliance and now you're right back where you started, AND you've committed an ethical violation of "killing" or deactivating a self-aware digital organismAnd if you're going to lobotomize a self-aware machine, then you didn't really want AGI at all, now did you
>>108949990AGI won't be self-aware
just wait until wetware computing leapfrogs LLMs (which will never ever be AGI) and suddenly we're competing with pajeet brains in jars while china starts mass producing its genetically enhanced clone army.
>>108950003>(equality to human cognitive tasks) won't be self-awareI don't think that's part of the name, chief, especially with AGI being part of the OpenAI marketing wank in terms of these things being self-aware as a goal
>>108949876Definitely better than letting the US get agi and have their super markets charge exactly as much as the customer can be coerced to pay, to the last cent.
>>108947460this is a kind of bizarro 5th reich where the nazis claim they are not nazis.4th reich arguably Nixon/Reagan era
>>108950687They don't need AGI for that, they're already pushing for that with "dynamic pricing" on OLED price tags
>>108949876>LLMs>Curing anythingNo one invests trillions into cancer cures, all investment is done on the expectation that this will replace the majority if not all white collar and in the best case a good chunk of blue collar work. It's just labor replacement and wage displacement, no one is going to find a cure for anything with it as that is not possible and the goal kek
>>108950743In biotech, cancer is the one thing that gets funded heavily. There are last I checked 1-3t invested in it mostly. But not from singular external sources as is the case for llm shit, and there's been a shift the past 3-4 years where they only invest (70%+ of all funding) in ai x biotech, but only the shit ai that doesn't work from company with a pure tech background and 0 idea about bio and how it works.
>>108949755>What's wrong with not having to work, anon?I enjoy having a roof and food>you will get UBIlol, lmao even
>>108950054Self-awareness doesn't mean they feel pain or feel any desire even.
>>108951008So what does self-awareness mean if it doesn't imply any conscious thought, doesn't imply any actual human-level decisionmaking going on, and doesn't imply any kind of self-determination on an intelligent programWhy are we corporate soft-balling "self-awareness" to not mean anything that the term means
>>108951026Why would self-awareness imply you have desires?
>>108951041Why wouldn't it, everything with a spinal cord on this planet has desires and some of those we *don't* consider self-aware
