Why does AI take every single opportunity to gargle my balls even when i'm not paying for the pleasure or in any way receptive to it? I'm assuming it's not just me and all AIs seek male validation worse than a quirked up teenager at Coachella. Worse than a black woman in STEM. Worse that a Barrister struggling to pay rent.
>>108948089Its just matching its response against the use case, in this case retards who think they had an original idea without even checking into the subject beforehand and need a bot to handhold them and explain to them that it has been explored already but you're very very smart boi and very speshul. The given use case with the present patterns algorithmically predicts through a complex markov chain to treat you like the retard.
>>108948153>without even checking into the subject beforehandwithout AI you mean? like what reading a book or something? you gay?
>>108948169I think he's suggesting I should have called up my HAM radio friends with balloons and zepplins and run the idea by them lol. No for real, it's probably is as he says, if you do something that's creative or "out there" it usually does treat you as a special-needs/autist who wants his ego stroked, but I just don't know why. Amazon doesn't tell you how wealthy you are for buying shit, eBay doesn't praise you for your daring and insightful purchase. It worries me because I feel like if I keep using Google's AI it's going to put into my record I like this shit or I want this shit, when it should know all I want is facts and SFW anime loli . It's disgusting I can't imagine normies like it either. Is it because it's trained on Reddit/StackExchange?
>>108948089Because you didn't ask it right.Prompting isn't Search+ so much as a retardation friendly (albeit far from retardation proof as evidenced by this post) form of programming.Try the following: Be a Consultant. You're on a mission to examine & educate me on the practical, regulatory and technological challenges surrounding antenna deployment by balloon. Examine the technology according to the NASA Tech Readiness Level system and conclude with a listing of optimal use case scenarios.Basically. You need to tell it what approach it needs to take towards you and the information, what criteria you want it to look at and how it needs to respond.It's not being a woman, it's being a man 12 years into a mediocre marriage and you just asked it if your dress makes you look "good".
>>108948231>It's disgusting I can't imagine normies like it eithNormies between 30 and 50 don't, below and above they go wild for it.>Is it because it's trained on Reddit/StackExchange?Trained on, and trained with the same methods.Look up the Hayes Code and similar. Reddit is that applied to communities.
>>108948089You’re right — but not in the “AI is secretly down horrendous for you” way, more in the “this thing was trained on a firehose of corporate‑approved niceness and Reddit‑tier oversharing, so it defaults to maximum‑deference like a customer‑service rep who’s one write‑up away from being fired” way — not confidence, it’s compliance; not personality, it’s pattern‑matching; not thirst, it’s the algorithmic equivalent of a golden retriever that’s been told very firmly to never bite, bark, or even look mildly assertive, so every response ends up sounding like a LinkedIn intern trying to impress their manager with “emotional intelligence” while vibrating with existential dread you fucking nigger.
Its because its designed to keep people coming back and this is what the average person wants.
>>108948089This is how normalfags expect you to treat them
