[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: aaxor7.jpg (45 KB, 525x475)
45 KB JPG
AI has sucked all of the fun out of programming
>>
It has
>>
>>108950723
You're getting old. And probably jelaous of those who have the energy to start completely delusional projects that cannot be done solo. Because now some of them can be done solo. No matter how much slop would be spilled along the way. It is possible now. But your long greay beard gets in the way.
>>
>>108950793
It's nothing to do with age. What attracted me as a kid is no longer there vis-a-vis employment, since the nature of the job changed. Luckily I'm a zoomer so it's not too late for me to find a new profession that would bring me happiness.
>>
>>108950793
I'm 21.
>>
>>108950723
The invention of the camera never stopped painters from painting.
>>
>>108950872
Except cameras are both objectively better and faster than paintings for capturing realism. AI is only faster than programming by hand.
>>
>>108950901
>Jeet misses the point of art
>>
>>108951135
You seem to have missed my point entirely, ironically.
>>
Perhaps you got too obsessed with implementation details.
Being able to rearchitect, refactor and implement features in mere minutes is amazing.
>>
>>108950901
It's not a lot faster if you actually want to understand (and constantly correct) the shit it spews out.
>>
>>108951150
It's the details that add up to a quality product. Slop on top of slop puts you in a jeet tier quality category.
>>
File: IMG_2255.jpg (52 KB, 736x736)
52 KB JPG
>>108950723
>AI has sucked all of the fun out of programming
>>
>>108951153
That doesn't seem to matter to devs anymore, sadly
>>
>>108951150
Does it make higher quality software? Or is it just more of it? More lines of code. More features. Is it better? Who cares?
>>
>>108950901
>Except cameras are objectively better than paintings for capturing realism.
Is it though?
A painter is not limited by pixels to represent reality.
Cameras don't capture the entire spectrum of light.
>>
>>108950838
Then you are retarded and lack imagination.
>>108951150
You can do the details too. In fact you can fuck around with bits and assembly insertions all over your code, optimize the shit out of every second line of code you have.
>>
There was a decade of other utilities doing that before AI showed up
>>
>>108951205
You're really trying to convince me that cameras are less realistic than painting?
>>
>>108950723
So stop using it for programming. Duh.
>>
>>108951209
>lack imagination
What? The thing I like about programming is actually programming lol. That's why I don't like AI
>>
>>108951214
Realism is not the point of art
>>
>>108951230
And then your boss asks why you're not writing enough code
>>
>>108951237
But it was the point of a lot of what painters did before camera.
>>
>>108951237
there no point in art
>>
File: 1757274782598951.png (85 KB, 304x360)
85 KB PNG
we had the same problem in the past
it was called
>move fast and break things
>>
>>108951214
Yes.
How can a pixel represent reality?
>>
>>108951336
How can a stroke of a brush?
>>
>>108951214
>>108951336
Digital information can not represent any reality.
It's all just an aproximation.
>>
>>108951341
A brush is analog, not digital.
The world is analog, not digital.

Film would be a better medium than digital cameras.
>>
>>108951341
A digital camera makes pixels which does not absorb all light and differentiate the colours (wave lengths).
A film camera is more accurate as it is not made of pixels, but it's the chemical reaction from light which makes the pattern.

A painting all different pigments and materials to get the right colour that gives of wave lengths closer to reality.
A painting has more freedom than cameras which are limited to it's medium being either film or digital information.
>>
File: fw190d9.png (56 KB, 512x256)
56 KB PNG
>>108950723
America sucked the fun out of dogfighting when the introduced Beyond-Visual-Range Missiles
>>
>>108951394
>A film camera is more accurate
Not necessarily. Depends on lots of factors. If you used a very sensitive and fine-grained film, you were paying a lot for it. Most film was one or the other or a balance between them (it was a direct trade off).
The good thing about a digital camera is you can take thousands of pictures, and you can review them quickly and decide which to keep. Even when the camera sensor ain't the best, that still lets you get good photos by letting you optimize the composition and allow for random chance.
>>
>>108950723
AI has just made debugging easier for me. No one is forcing you to use it to generate code.
>>
It has but I'm 29 and too old for a career switch, I'd be like 35 when I grad now. CS is extremely gay and lame.
>>
>>108951191
Those who it matters to will be the new elite.
The rest of the peasants will be rolling in AI slime.
>>
>>108951185
Move Slow, Snailcat!
>>
>>108950723
It hasn't. Just don't use AIshit and stop acting like a drug addict coping about not being able to function without jew juice



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.