Why did software video encoding peak with x264?
>>108953302It hasn't peaked yet, don't conflate memories of shit you saw when 264 was new as the technology being good
>>108953302it peaked at webm
>>108953302MP4= 18518 KBAV1= 3891 KB**** 78% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.990 @ CRF 58MP4= 3350 KBAV1= 1042 KB**** 68% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.992 @ CRF 50MP4= 3230 KBAV1= 856 KB**** 73% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.990 @ CRF 48MP4= 4528 KBAV1= 1630 KB**** 64% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108938759
>>108953302what about x265
Never used x264. Using anything but hardware accelerators for h264 is retarded. SVT-AV1 just works
>>108953313>>108953354>>108953369Display resolution peaked at 1080p.Audio resolution peaked at 24/44.1.Video encoding peaked at x264.Audio encoding peaked at Ogg Vorbis.Simple as. Everything else is noise and gobbledygook. Anyone who thinks they need more is simply retarded.
>>108953411see >>108953341
>>108953415Hate to break it to you, but this debate has been over for years bro.
>>108953422MP4= 18518 KBAV1= 3891 KB**** 78% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.990 @ CRF 58MP4= 3350 KBAV1= 1042 KB**** 68% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.992 @ CRF 50MP4= 3230 KBAV1= 856 KB**** 73% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****SSIM: 0.990 @ CRF 48MP4= 4528 KBAV1= 1630 KB**** 64% filesize reduction achieved with AV1 ****https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/108938759
>>108953341>comparing a container to a codec
>>108953302That was the last time quality was ever a design constraint. Now they only care about bitrate. All codecs since and including HEVC have mandatory "pre-processing" (blur filter) that none of the encoders that actually work let you turn off. Macroblocking also makes quantization noise much more noticeable to the human eye.
>>108953481>nigger frogpostingYou think you're better than me?into the filter you go btw
>>108953488Mein Führer, but we must accept that there's some kind of quality/compression balance. I think 0.99 SSIM is that balance. What's the point of 0.999 SSIM if it increases the bitrate by 10X and improves quality by 1%?
>>108953411It's interesting how no matter who you ask, everything always peaked when they were 15
>>108953341>>108953448>MP4 vs AV1Is this bait?
>>10895354599% of the time an MP4 contains H.264 video so I don't see the problem. Saying something like MP4 vs WebM would be really retarded though since half of exisitng WebM files contain VP8 video.
>>108953534In my case, it is ontologically correct.
When will 4chan accept AV1 if it's so good then?
>>108953686It won't, umigalaxy accepts custom user AV1 uploads right now though.
>>108953703What about some altchans that do?
>>108953711That pretty much is one. Thing looks like it's still under construction desu family member sama san.
>>108953686>When will 4chan accept AV1 if it's so good then?The administration here encourages low quality engagement bait, which is why they recently added h264 support: Because it makes it easier to post twitter videos now that you can just download the "video only" version and post it as-isAV1 support will be added after twitter switches to AV1
>>108953791>AV1 support will be added after twitter switches to AV1I find this hard to believe when a sea of websites have been switching over to Webp for images, yet 4chan still doesn't even support that. Webp isn't even a new image format or good outside of anime but it's old as dirt compared to AV1. Yet still no support for that either...
>>108953804The admins here are incompetent and probably think adding another codec will add another vulnerability they won't know how to patch
>>108953411>Audio encoding peaked at Ogg VorbisSpotify still uses this format so anyone disliking this format can also start dislking Spotify I guess. Audio format will never be taken seriously until lossy format in streaming services stop being paywalled.
>>108953947>Audio format will never be taken seriously until lossy format in streaming services stop being paywalledNobody but nerds care about codecs or quality. I'm talking from genuine IRL experience with normgroid interaction. Normalfags are 100% fine with watching YIFY encodes
>>108953411holy based. I can even agree on 24 bit because while fp32 is great, you can just record at 24 because the headroom is infinite if you don't record like a retard and you're just going to quantize down to 16 bits anyway (as you should), so dither will just take care of that as it is.
>>108953804Lol shlomo can't afford disk space anymore, spent too much money on the homo cuck bunker
>>108954077What are you calling jewish? The snapdragon or webp?
>>108953851>4chan was utilizing a version of ghostscript from 2012the last version before it became AGPL softwarelazy fucks
>>108954004>Nobody but nerds care about codecs or qualityWho spends money for the lossy shit then?
