[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: chacha20.png (570 KB, 1776x1212)
570 KB PNG
Use case over AES?
>>
Stream ciphers make better pseudo-random generators out of the box.
>>
>>108959011
Progressive encryption always better.
But usecase not applicable to filesystes.
>>
>>108958910
faster than AES on platforms where AES is not hardware-accelerated. XChaCha20 supports bigger nonces (very useful when supporting massive message counts under a single key)
>>
>>108959494
This chacha is better when it's usable. But there remains specific use cases where AES must still be used instead of Chacha, like full disk encryption. Also even without hardware implementation, chacha is already really fast, so it's not really a killer feature of AES in that matter
>>
Name that's more enjoyable to say
>>
>>108958910
Use case over ChaCha8 or Speck?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.