sorry anons i been afk last few weekswtf is this shit? how close is physical labour from being replaced?how do i get a giga army of robots?
It’s a stupid job and nobody needs to do it.
>>108959382Riddle me this: OP picrel vs robot arm on wheels
>>108959426This. However under the current system, it just means more wealth transfer (but not towards us).Also humanoid robots don't make sense on streamlined production lines. If you've ever seen sorting robots, they can sort 100 parallel lines at ones, processing tens of thousands of items at once.On alibaba, you can get a 6000 eggs/hrs sorting robot for $1,500, and it will do a much better job than an army of humanoid robots (or humans for that matter)
>>108960476Who is us?
>>108960502People earning money through their work, instead of the work of other people
>>108960536aka cattle
>>108960594so it's cattle vs parasite.than you shlomo for being honest
>>108960602There's nothing parasitic about being a manager. If their work wasn't valuable the company would have no incentive to keep them.
>>108960476Humanoid robots make sense anywhere production lines currently employ humans. Which is for a surprising amount of rote factory jobs.
>>108960614I am not talking about managers. Most managers still earn money through their salary and don't directly earn money by exploiting the work of others. Managers typically have 'productivity' goals set by their superiors. It's only a fraction of managers that actually earn a reasonable income through stock options.If a team earns it's company 10x more money than predicted, the managers won't earn 10x more money, the shareholders on the other hands will be the one to reap benefits.
>>108960634NTA, but these are not autonomous robots. They're remotely controlled robots, meaning that the real goal is to replace local workers with foreign workers, without laws to prevents it from happening. Your politicians and lawmakers can no longer control the share of foreign workers in your economy (e.g through visa quotas), thus leading to lower wages for everyone, and higher payouts for shareholders
>>108960476the main advantage is that you don't have to offer health care to robots
>>108959382Can you afford a single non-humanoid robot that have existed for many decades?
>>108961443On op's vid, if they're still using humans for flipping packages, instead of automated arms, then it's probably because it's already cheaper to do so. I don't see why a robot that needs energy just to not trip on the floor would be more efficient than a simple robotic arm + camera, like in other production lines
