[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1655912146311.jpg (514 KB, 976x1010)
514 KB JPG
>Python forces you to have constructors
>No access specifiers, so classes in Python are less richer than structs or classes in C++
>Can't define member elements within a class without a constructor
Yeah, this language sucks for OOP. C++ and C# are still the gold standard.
>>
>>108960824
can you show us on the doll where the java touched you?
>>
>complains about OOP
>C# is best
>mfw windians can't dataobject
python
from dataclasses import dataclass

@dataclass
class InventoryItem:
"""Class for keeping track of an item in inventory."""
name: str
unit_price: float
quantity_on_hand: int = 0

def total_cost(self) -> float:
return self.unit_price * self.quantity_on_hand

# will add a __init__() that looks like:

def __init__(self, name: str, unit_price: float, quantity_on_hand: int = 0):
self.name = name
self.unit_price = unit_price
self.quantity_on_hand = quantity_on_hand

https://docs.python.org/3/library/dataclasses.html



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.