[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: GzY3-dCW8AAZoxG.jpg (166 KB, 2048x1042)
166 KB JPG
>>
>>108967684
UE5 is such a piece of shit.
>>
>>108967684
rtx 2060 was released in january 2019. It’s now mid 2026. Surely a gpu that’s no more than 7 years old isn’t wholly unreasonable for modern, gpu intensive games?
>>
>>108968614
No.
>>
>>108967684
just play daggerfall unity its a better game anyway
>>
>>108967684
Works fine on my Nvidia™ 5090™.
>>
>>108968614
It wouldn't be unreasonable if games actually looked good.
>>
>>108967684
I didn't know there was an elder scrolls doom game lmao
>>
>>108968614
games in 2015 looked the same or better than games in 2026 though
and on low resolution they still looked good, here you see literal wireframes shit, shimmering shit and smudges of countours of objects in motion
>>
>>108967684
what hardware is that, skylake integrated graphics?
>>
>>108967684
meanwhile on 2004-2006 hardware
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbhjmh8UGc8
>>
>>108968614
ii had a 2060 up until last year and it played everything pretty well if you're not chasing the 4k meme, even emulating switch games at 60fps without issue on 6gb vram



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.