I miss the time before AI
>>108968255Literally nothing changes for me beside my parents being addicted to watching tiktok aislop of Trump shitting himself or cat videos.
>>108968268Must be nice to be a NEET
I miss moot
>>108968272Neetdom always leads to suicidal ideation
>>108968255You miss having a life expectancy of 20?It's funny how you luddite fuckers glorify the past when most humans throughout history barely made it past childbirth. Thank technology today you're not dying of malaria in some African jungle.
>>108968372AI bros can't even read
>>108968378Luddites coping.
>>108968255I miss the time before 9/11/2001.(Disclaimer: this post may or may not be AI generated. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of 4chan.org or its subsidiaries. All rights reserved.)
>>108968381No, you literally didn't read the screenshot you posted.
>>108968384I did. "most humans throughout history barely made it past childbirth." is correct.If you're lucky to live to 20 it's because some wandering tribe hasn't already raped your town. Which was very common throughout history.
>>108968368*being poor leads to suicidal ideation
>>108968255I miss the time before Indians got widespread access to the Internet.
>>108968412Unless you're Japanese there's no difference.
>>108968255I don't
>>108968255I'm between seething about it's intrusion into my life and wanting to egg it on in an accelerationist way. Like FAFO but keep me away from the collateral.Unlike other fads AI is unfortunately here to stay. Even in the best case scenerio it will still be used to create an abundance of low quality freeware. And we've had an entire generation of hardware and software built around it.At least I'm free because I've built an ecosystem for myself out of niche alternatives.
>>108968348>I miss mootYou mean the guy who made /pol/ after he met Epstein, ruining the site?
>>108968255holy fuck why are luddites spamming this board right now
>>108968492Why do you guys always say "unfortunate"? Technology in the past 20 years was stagnant. Cameras stayed the same. Cars stayed the same. Even video games barely evolved.Yet AI finally gives a chance to breathe new life into everything. It's honestly the best outcome of all time. We now get better medicine, self driving cars, free art and robo-waifus in the same sprint. How the fuck do you resist that?
>>108968255Ai won lil bro. There’s nothing you can do about itYou’d better start vibeGODDING stuff if you don’t want to be left behind
>>108968521>spammingLow-effort b8, considering the fact there are any number of AI-centric generals in the catalogue at all times. We're all just experiencing nigger fatigue at the moment. And I do mean "nigger".
>>108968534ai is the most powerful piece of tech created by the man
>>108968532>still at with with the chomijjujeez, spamming this won't lead anywhere.
>>108968541I won
>>108968537Okay? I don't see what that statement has anything to do with the the state of the board.
>>108968255SameI'm a webshitter and I liked my job up to 2 years ago. Felt good having skills to build stuffNow my job has been reduced to "hey codex read this ticket (which was also generated by codex) and propose an implementation plan" and then just review the code and pushI mean I have a lot more free time but also this impending feeling of being the useless middleman
>>108968550This is the technology board, ai is tech If you don’t like tech (luddite) you can go away
>>108968546you won't
>>108968578you look like this keeeeeeeek
>>108968589and this is you kkekekkeke
>>108968554Here's something I don't get about you.If you hate your job or find it too easy then why not just... take a harder job instead? Like plumbing? >But I don't wanna get my hands dirty.Then quit bitching.
>>108968577It's understandable that AI discussion would be ubiquitous--as you said it is a technology board. My issue isn't with the generals per se--they are a source of schizofaggotry, but the regulars of those threads have issue with them too--my issue is with faggots telling everyone what's what, and perpetuating their shitty memes, like this nigger >108968532. I'd be less "hostile" if thirdies didn't have access to the site. At least then I'd be sure that most of the stupidity is domestic.
>>108968613you are trans
>>108968613Memes make 4chan great. Go to reddit if you want your dick sucked.
>>108968598No
>>10896837220 would have been enough.
>>108968627Yes
>>108968526is stagnant. is.
>>108968638Dude, there are now video games being vibe coded in a day. Give it a few more months and people in their basement can make Grand Theft Auto at home.
>>108968633you’re trans
>>108968577no libtard, this is not tech support board.>>108968657>>108968622>mad because everyone nooticed youYou are grandmas
>>108968526There are many reasons to hate "AI". I can admit there are some improvements in niche cases like medicine. But for the most part it's a surrogacy for authenticity. In software it's being used to cut corners and the execution is awful. There are countless examples of it performing worse than existing algorithmic solutions. Worse of all you can't opt out without abandoning most of your stack.A lot of this could have been remedied if the approach was better. Instead of forcing it into everything it could have been sold as a premium on top of existing tools. It should have been sold as a product without being part of the product.It's also not even real AI. Or at least it's very rudimentary. If you ever watched Sword Art Online or Ghost in the Shell, you know a true AI would be bottom up. What we have is an imitation, which could be a start and used in some applications.Personally it killed all my dreams of going into tech. Imagine being told "learn to code" all your life and then growing up just to see the job be reduced to virtual janitor work. I don't like things being forced on me or paying for things I wouldn't use.As for tech stagnating I think that's more of a problem of tech companies refusing to take risks while taking up monopolies. AI was just a cost-cutting measure for them. True innovation will come when there are several companies trying new things to compete for market share, them moving in lockstep like this shows the opposite.
>>108968622And you, my good sir, are a nigger. We can't verify or otherwise disprove either of our assertions, so let us move forward with the assumption that they are both true for the sake of practicality. >>108968623You can't just shoehorn a meme like that one faggot keeps attempting to--no, other third worlders adopting it doesn't count. Either you're a marketing nigger hired by Gook, or a literal nigger, who's easily amused and whose main appeal to the site is its inane entertainment aspect. Also, the Internet's user base can't just be split in two; it isn't le based 4fags vs le cringe Redditors. From the prospective of other platforms/imageboards who haven't met the same fate as this shithole, you're seen in the same light as Reddit.
>>108968678>if the approach was betterThey wouldn't be able to gather the absurd resources needed to train their models. It's so absurd. To train a person you need to give them food, some textbooks, and a computer. To train AI you need to throw infinity compute at it, and it still churns out garbage.
>>108968678People said the same thing about every big technological development, but I don't see any of you fags wanting to destroy electricity, internet, automobiles, mass production of physical goods, or any of the other numerous techs that completely removed and made obsolete massive swathes of workers, even family trades.I don't respect anti AI people because you have no ideological consistency or integrity. The only thing you care about is how this particular thing has, or might, affect you negatively. But you don't give a shit about all the identical cases that hurt other people
something something man made horrors something
>>108968396yall idiots latched onto the one word you learned. Luddite and think it makes you seem smart and enlightened. But brushing off legit criticisms as anti progress is disingenuous at best.
>>108968678>There are countless examples of it performing worse than existing algorithmic solutions. Worse of all you can't opt out without abandoning most of your stack.You act like the weaknesses or flaws or permanent. 5 years ago no one would have believed a computer could write code.Now today we're have debates on whether junior programmers can match a robot. Just imagine where the technology will be next year? It will absolutely be senior level at everything.>Personally it killed all my dreams of going into tech. Imagine being told "learn to code" all your life and then growing up just to see the job be reduced to virtual janitor work. I don't like things being forced on me or paying for things I wouldn't use.Well that's too bad because productivity will always win out. If you didn't use AI to code then someone else would have done it and still put you out of business.There is no point crying about it. Either find new ways to deal with it or just take up another job. No one forced you to go into computer science...>As for tech stagnating I think that's more of a problem of tech companies refusing to take risks while taking up monopoliesThat's not true. Look at what Nintendo did with the Wii and DS? They innovated but gamers demanded they go back to traditional controls.The risks were there but the audiences turned their noses up at it.
>>108968705What did the internet create? Instantaneous communication for everyone anywhere. What did cars and trains create? Radically faster transportation. What did electricity create? Artificial lighting and an energy grid. What did AI create? Charlie Kirk memes? It hasn't made people more intelligent. It doesn't "understand" anything. It hasn't radically changed the end product software being built and shipped. At the very best it's enabled the same software to be produced faster, but I frankly see no evidence that's actually happening.
>>108968255I miss the time before phoneposters
>>108968534>AI-centric generalspeople talk about technology, how they use it etc>luddite spams threadfaggot-tier images and writing style, parroting techlet-opinions like "muh autocomplete"zero technology talkfuck off, please
>>108968736> But brushing off legit criticisms as anti progress is disingenuous at best.There is no legit criticism.Imagine it's WW2 and you were standing behind the President and said "Maybe we should slown down the war effort"?You fighting progress wouldn't stop the Germans or Japanese from pushing ahead. In fact, Luddites asking to stop technology are literally helping Russia and China.Both countries will never sign an AI agreement so the robot future is still coming. The only difference is who controls it in the end.
>>108968255why
>>108968534>>108968613>>108968679Peak autism
>>108968372i'm 30 and i've about had my fill. you don't want to live forever, do you?
>>108968691>To train a person you need to give them food, some textbooks, and a computer. To train AI you need to throw infinity compute at it, and it still churns out garbage.You left out a lot of information.To train a human you need to raise them for 18 years first. While hoping they stay in school and not becoming some thug or druggie low life.A robot has no such risk factor. They can be mass produced in a day and they will always stay focused on their job.No vacations. No breaks. No calling in sick to work so they can go party.The only garbage is you.
>>108968691I mean imagine if instead of Copilot being released as a clippy tier annoyance in literally every Microsoft app it was released as an addon package on top of Windows, using context and internal APIs to be helpful in specific cases where it might be useful. Then it might actually be exciting.>>108968705>>108968740You're misunderstanding my position. There are two sides to anti-AI, one you might draw parallels to the luddite movement, that is on the low-IQ end of the bell curve. I'm denying that this is a technological advancement in the first place. I don't feel threatened that it can perform better than me or go rogue. I'm saying it's being misused in the majority of cases and in some it's negating actual tech advancements.If you're looking to ragebait luddites go to Reddit art communities.
>>108968691model usage can be scaled infinitely, but you can't duplicate a human worker
