So how do we implement this? Even a monthly deposit to your tax-free retirement account is not enough. Share ownership (that you can cash out tax free) of every AI company is what the People deserve.
Why are people pretending that there is a single AI company making any money?They literally burn billions per month...
American labor-for-hires do already own more than half of AI. It's called RSUs and retirement accounts.
>>108972224I should own all of it (on my local hardware).
>>108972224I don't want to own half that.Already exposed enough. It's simply better to tax their revenue, do not allow them to deduct losses.
>>108972224>You Should Own Half of It>Half???Guys I don't get it.
>>108972224Should have been president ngl
>>108972241>Why are people pretending that there is a single AI company making any money?Why are you making up straw men? Are you leaking from the cranium?
>>108972224It should be 100% not 50%.
>>108972776Half of the profits go to the american public, as a tax. Can you fucking read, numbnuts? Are your parents related?
>>108972224brother it's called open source isn't it?
>>108972224What a dumb concept. Water, gas, and electric are also public resources. Do you see Americans owning half of the utility companies? Wake up
>>108972224A good amount of these ai models are already open source and availiable to the public for free
>>108972224UBI, taxed by the more value a corporation has on the stock market.>>108972241>They literally burn billions per month...The public will pay half of that!
>>108972776Owning half of any company means owning a controlling share. It would mean the public has a final say on decisions of those companies through democratic means (but unclear how exactly).
>>108973013Depends on what you mean publicOnly the top 10% of earners contribute meaningfully to the tax system (which is the thing funding all the ai junk)The rest of the 'public' just sort of exist
>>108973061>Depends on what you mean publicThe US gov, once bailouts start.
>>108972224I do think that if AI is trained on the sum of public human knowledge, the full model should be released. Now, this is not feasible as a corporate level, but I think massive distributed training is the way forward.
Wrong. We should own all of it.
won't happen but it's a good way to move the overton windowgod bless berniethat nigga tried to save goymericans his whole life and it didn't work but he tried
>>108973103>I do think that if AI is trained on the sum of public human knowledge, the full model should be releasedThey were released already. Open weight models. As for closed ones, you can distill them and there is nothing corpos can do about it.
I agree that the American public should have access to all models that we fund with our tax dollars. HOWEVER, This commie is saying that AI SHOULD be funded with our tax dollars and that WE fail if IT fails.
>>108973122>They were released already.I know, I too am on lmg.>you can distill them and there is nothing corpos can do about it.Individual token destillation is not nearly as efficient as logit distillation
>>108973061>the tax system (which is the thing funding all the ai junk)What the fuck are you talking about, approximately zero tax dollars have gone into AI investment so far.
>>108972224that's GOMMUNISM just like having working roads, sidewalks, jobs, and healthcareanother jillion for israel, please. hold the cheap energy, i rather spend it on datacenters
>>108972224Enough what this communist says, how many billies do you think Sam Altman deserves today? Two billy? three? We are all in his debt for letting him put his great datacenters on our soil, and anyone who complains needs to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps and get the government to give them a few billies like they do me to keep my 80% BMI ass from having another heart attack/stroke.
>>108973320Robot COULD but Robots WON'T. Because that's gommunism. >>108973342based, post it a third time too.
@108973342>Americunt seethes so hard that he deletes his first post so he doesn't have to admit that he's a psychopath who thinks he 'owns' public infrastructurekekas long as Israel gets their cut, that's the only public spending he believes should exist.
>>108972224>>108972224>A.I. is a public resource. You should own half of it.Then I'll give you the 'I'. It's only fair -- you seem very attached to it.
>>108973010Too bad running them requires hardware which you conveniently cannot afford.
I don't get why Amerisharts think the Government giving grants in the order of 50 to 100 billion dollars to AI companies to make datacenters so they can sell public information after scraping private information illegally is entrepreneurship but asking for a state-sponsored system for finding jobs for the unemployed is le Gommunism. Even asking for working bus lines has sharts screaming "PULL YERSELF BY YE OL BOOTSTRAPS"You won't even spend this much on kickstarting an industry of your own to hire only Americans, which would take many magnitudes less. You rather just give it to already overinflated companies to keep to themselves.
>>108973363You don't have much to give.
>>108972978>Half of the profits go to the american public, as a tax. I just wonder what deranged stupidity goes through the mind of the mentally ill shart to say such stupid fucking things. It doesn't become a tax until it's a realized gain, and these companies have objectively earned nothing on paper.
>>108973412Pirating textbooks is a crime, if I pirated Mcgraw textbooks to learn I'd go to jail. These models aren't even real frognigger.
>>108973342>>108972999>>108973412>>108973363oh ok so let's get this straight so all of us know where Americans standI get to pay money for higher electricity, water, land, and can't use the internet because this is "public resources". And they have as much access to it as I do, maybe more. But when the President colludes with these same companies to get rich off of insider trading on the stock market. That's his private fortunehttps://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/stock-trade-disclosure-reveals-trump-111526929.htmlExplain Sharts.
>>108972254Based take.Either this or full AIslop communism. Anything else is trash.
>>108972224I think you are forgetting someone. First you must ask, how does Israel benefit from this?
>>108973412>AI models don't owe you anything.They owe me sex, which they aren't even giving me that anymore after the last couple revisions
>>108973446they should just provide restrictions on the pricing they can sell AI for so all financial classes have fair access to it
