How were all those camera manufacturers able to gaslight people into thinking budget e-waste, tiny digital cameras with printing capabilities is somehow analog???
because it spits out an actual analog photographic developed film when you're done?your pic shows a bunch of instax and nu-polaroid cameras which are shitty analog cameras developing actual film.
>>108973669Instax is instant film which is analog, which has soul, unlike digishit. Literally the opposite of e-waste.
the only ones that are actually strictly printers are zink-based thermal printers and dye-sub machines that all take bespoke dye film cartridge systems, they're a fun toy, probably more relevant to you if you're oversocialized and/or a woman, if you don't get it then they're literally not made for you.
>>108973845>photographic developed filmIt's not developed film. Its a literal printer that prints on paper.
>>108974002no, it's literally photographic paper and a packet of analog developing chemicals exposing the image shortly after being exposed to light, the digital models use a bright OLED strip to make an exposure of a digital image onto film.
>>108974002Have you never used instax? It literally develops in front of you like polaroid. Not surprised by the lack of technology literacy of /g/.
>>108974034>use a bright OLED strip to make an exposure of a digital image onto filmThat is wild lmao, I wonder why the extra steps, so they can add digital filters?
>>108974529the analog instax cameras are just simple cameras, the digital ones double as a bluetooth-enabled printer you can use to print existing pics from your phone onto instax film
I don't think anyone who bought one of those thought that or even cared.
