[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (21).jpg (18 KB, 463x431)
18 KB JPG
humiliation ritual
what is the use case for this ui other than humiliation?
>>
>>108983748
snaps?
>>
>>108983748
I am on a mac and have never used this installation method. I always use Brew.
>>
>>108984082
What is brew?
>>
>>108984335
banger modal jazz piece by renowned trumpeter Miles Davis
>>
>>108984373
Thats bitches brew. That anon was talking about a different brew.
>>
File: 1779885651601471.gif (6 KB, 420x385)
6 KB GIF
>>108983748
You got it backwards.

The humiliation ritual is going through 20 steps of setup wizard, checking and correcting all the settings and manually dodging sketchy third party installations that are hiding in there for all the normies that repeatedly click "next" without reading.
The "slightly move icon to install" is the luxury blessed experience.
>>
>>108984335
brew these balls
>>
>>108983748
agreed. i can't imagine how many mounted installers are in the finder window of normies
>>
File: ion.jpg (715 KB, 2880x1480)
715 KB JPG
>>108986249
more software? for me? why dont mind if i do
>>
>>108986275
MacOS users are computer literate
The normie boomers you think of use Windblows or just their phones
>>
>I want more control
>no not like this
>>
>>108983748
Well it's a little retarded, but the use case for this UI is that you can actually drag the app to other locations other than the Applications folder that shows up there. You can drag it anywhere
>>
>>108983748
I never got it either. It's not like you have the choice where to install the app. And why not have a simple Yes/No prompt instead of this thing that looks like a flash game for toddlers.
>>
>>108986296
>I want more convenience
>no not like this
Two posts to describe 80-95% of all /g/ posts.
>>
>>108986249
Except these wizards give you actually useful option like where you want your software installed or select what components you want.
I'm sorry such things are too complex for your underdeveloped itoddler brain.

>manually dodging sketchy third party installations
That hasn't been a thing on over 10 years unless you're installing some really dodgy shit.
>>
>>108984082
Oh so you use a grand total of 5 cli apps?
>>
File: 1356708363406.jpg (32 KB, 408x493)
32 KB JPG
>>108986295
>MacOS users are computer literate
Lol. Lmao.
Mactards can't even understand the concept of a file path because even that is obfuscated by their retarded OS. The only thing they know how to do on a computer is use a web browser and upload thier photos to icloud (that they pay for like good paypigs)
>>
>>108983748
You can cope how you like but the way Mac handles applications and puts them in their own cuckshed is far superior to how Windoes does it.
>>
>>108986439
>how Windoes does it
You mean letting you choose where you want your application installed instead of putting it in some hidden inaccessible mystery folder? You macfags are the biggest slaves ever.
>>
>>108986296
What control?
>>
>>108986465
>hidden inaccessible mystery folder
you mean the applications folder? kek, windows is the one that letps apps put shit wherever they fuck they want even scattered across multiple random folders for no good reason
>>
>>108986365
>give you actually useful option like where you want your software installed
No need. By default, macos doesn't spread dozens of files and folders and plugins and configs all over your PC, everything is neatly organized inside the container that you "drag to install" that one time.
You can drag it wherever you like, that's going to be the installation folder.
Individual software can still decide to rely on a more traditional setup wizard, or even save stuff outside of the container to provide continuity with the same software on different systems.
>>
>>108986465
ah yes, the hidden inaccessible mystery folder, also known as %APPDATA%.
at least macos has the application folder visible accessible from the finder but you wouldn't know because you've never actually used that os.
>>
File: 16103447.png (109 KB, 320x240)
109 KB PNG
>>108983748
it's just asking you to move it to the applications folder
>>
>>108986493
So what happens when you run out of space on your Applications drive? Oh wait, you can't even upgrade storage space on Macs.

>windows is the one that letps apps put shit wherever they fuck they want even scattered across multiple random folders for no good reason
On you mean just like on a mac os? At least many windows apps will not touch any other dir than the one you've installed it in- it's completely up to the dev. Mac os literally forces an app to be spread in a gazillion dirs
>~/Applications
>~/Library/Preferences
>~/Library/Application Support
>~/Library/Caches
>~/Library/Saved Application State
>~/Library/Logs
Yeah, so much nicer and more neat than windows, right?

>>108986496
>you can drag it wherever you like, that's going to be the installation folder.
Where? There's literally only one option.
>>
>>108986563
>Yeah, so much nicer and more neat than windows, right?
Yeah, actually but I guess its a matter of opinion
>>
>>108986513
%APPDATA% is instantly accessible the moment you type it in explorer. On a mac you have to run 10 different commands just to be able to get to those forbidden parts that crapple doesn't want you to touch on your "own" device. And you can never even have root access.
I know this because I've had to work on a macshit for 4 years at 2 different jobs (tho on one of them I was only using it to run a Linux VM to do my work because of how useless macos is), so I am fully aware that you're lying and trying to spread bullshit.
>>
>>108986343
>It's not like you have the choice where to install the app
You can drag it anywhere
>>
File: 1758212052863870.jpg (78 KB, 640x700)
78 KB JPG
>>108986465
>>108986563
>letting you choose where you want your application installed
That's what macos does, you can drag it everywhere. It is your to decide.

>instead of putting it in some hidden inaccessible mystery folder?
And that's what Windows does.
Maybe I remember where I installed the software itself, but where are all of its files and configs and so on?
Maybe inside the folder in Program files/common. Maybe it's the x86 version of the directory.
Maybe it's in Documents. Maybe it's Program Data.
Maybe it's in Appdata/roaming, or maybe it's Appdata/local: they're both "hidden inaccessible mystery folder" according to 99% of users. Maybe it's in local/programs? Or some other esoteric location?
Who the fuck knows. Even the software itself often doesn't know and can't/won't explicitly point it out.
>>
>>108986709
itoddlers truly are retarded
>>
>>108986655
>You can drag it anywhere
But there's only one place to drag it.
>>
>>108986722
I mean you can drag it from that window outside of the window
>>
>>108986716
Are you the same mouthbreather that keeps saying there's "only one place to drag it" on Mac, while you can install the software in literally every single directory?
>>
>>108986599
>On a mac you have to run 10 different commands just to be able to get to those forbidden parts
What?
Windows literally hides it. Macos doesn't. What the fuck are you talking about
>>
>>108986709
In windows, you usually have AT MOST some non-important cache files in appdata- the rest is wherever you installed it which can easily checked in the Properties tab of the shortcut. 90% of the times the app is completely self-contained in the folder you installed it.
The whole thing with apps on windows getting installed in mystery folders under C: without any prompt is just another example tranny devs following some retarded crapple trend that boomers and morons like yourself somehow consider more "convenient"
>>
>>108986759
macos literally prevents you from accessing these dirs, even from the terminal. God forbid you want to access /
There is nothing inaccessible in windows
>>
>>108986765
>The whole thing with apps on windows getting installed in mystery folders under C: without any prompt is just another example tranny devs following some retarded crapple trend
But the "apple trend" is literally self-contained software, all stored in a single "software" folder

It's precisely the opposite of the issue
>>
>>108986742
>can drag it from that window outside of the window
There is absolutely nothing is that faggot UI/UX design that lets users know that.
Not to mention that the fast majority of apps will simply not work unless they're in Applications (or basically force you to be moved there).
>>
>>108986799
The apple trend is clearly spreading a single app into as many hidden dirs as possible and not letting the user know where the fuck anything is.
I still remember spending hours on one of my older jobs trying to find where the hell the cache for intellij is because as it turns out "uninstalling" software on mac os doesn't actually delete anything aside from some binaries and leaves a shitton of garbage on your system.
I am so fucking glad I don't have to touch that piece of shit operating system for any reason anymore.
>>
File: 1775592797109296.png (33 KB, 388x482)
33 KB PNG
>>108986783
But that's wrong
You can click "go to", type the folder name and access every folder in macos.
You have to enable hidden folders on both systems.
Why lying
>>
>>108986371
ackshually, 8.
>>
>>108986822
>There is absolutely nothing is that faggot UI/UX design that lets users know that.
No need to, they're not as retarded as you

>the fast majority of apps will simply not work unless they're in Applications
Wrong
>>
>>108986850
>The apple trend is clearly spreading a single app into as many hidden dirs as possible and not letting the user know where the fuck anything is
No that's windows
>>108986709
Apple literally just puts everything inside a single container, inside a single folder
>>
>>108986599
~/Library is instantly accessible the moment you type it in Finder

>On a mac you have to run 10 different commands
right click > show Library folder
wow so hard
>>
File: 1740200215409079.webm (290 KB, 1280x1280)
290 KB
290 KB WEBM
>>108983748
toddlers love shitting themselves for humiliation purposes.
>>
>>108986969
>no u
>presents a completely false statement, already proven so ITT
Whatever you say, apple paypig.
>>
I boughted a white MacBook once, that was like 15 years ago, I think. First time I see this shit, I'm like wot? Are they serious? After a year of using it, I just installed Ubuntu on it.
>>
>>108987017
Clearly you've never used a computer before for anything other that web browsing and consooming media.
>>
File: show-library-folder.png (813 KB, 1694x1064)
813 KB PNG
>>108987049
you've never used macOS
>>
>>108987042
Wrong
>>
>>108986783
>macos literally prevents you from accessing these dirs, even from the terminal.
No It doesn't
>>
>>108986249
I'm more https://docs.redhat.com/en/documentation/red_hat_enterprise_linux/10/html/installing_identity_management/index guy
>>
>>108986563
>On you mean just like on a mac os?
Nope, I meant specificallyike it almost always happens on windows.
>much nicer and more neat than windows, right?
Actually yeah
Even the very few example of software that spread shit out of its container does so inside the library folder
Can't say the same about windows
>>
>>108987086
This looks like a low effort Linux DE (with no Wayland support) rather than a premium proprietary product from a big company
>>
>>108986365
>these wizards give you actually useful option like where you want your software installed
Strictly speaking, the .app file is a folder with everything needed to run the application in it, and the folder icon below it is just a shortcut to /Applications. If you want, when you mount the .dmg, you can open up a Finder window and drag and drop the .app folder to somewhere other than /Applications.

>select what components you want
If you want a complex installer, MacOS has the .pkg file format, allowing a more traditional customizable installer. Most applications don't have removable features though. You have a binary, some libraries, and some assets in a folder.

Fuck's sake, I don't even use MacOS. I'm typing this on an Ubuntu laptop right now. But the system's fine. If I find myself distributing applications to end users, it's not going to have an installer. It's going to be a single .elf file statically linked with all assets compiled in.
>>
File: samehere.png (1.18 MB, 1744x1297)
1.18 MB PNG
>>108983748
We have that on Linux now!
>>
>>108987673
It's better than iToddlerOS retardation since you can configure each app, add github link so it can auto-update applications.
>>
This shit was so retarded I stopped using MacOS right there and then.
How anyone beyond the age of 3 can use this is beyond me
>>
>>108987086
I don't understand a single thing on this screenshot
>Always open in icon view
>Browse in icon view
What is "icon view"? The opposite of a >Label position:
What label ?
>Show item info
What is item info? Details?
>Show Library Folder
Don't understand what is meant
>Background:
Use case for changing background colour?
>>
>brew install --cask google-chrome
couldn't be me



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.