Use case for monitors larger than 1920x1080p?
>>108990625Gaming. Remember that gnome did not acknowledge the existence of above 60 hz refresh rates until 2019?
>>1089906251440p scales very well from 720p
>>108990625what a handsome fella
>>108990625hating pixelsdisplaying fonts with bad/broken/missing hinting
>>108990625it's very good for programming. I bought a 4K 35in for 170 bucks. I'm very happy with it and it makes working with splits in my code editor way nicer
>>108990625more words fit my screen at once
>>108990640and from 480 too, but very poorly from 1080 which has become the new standard for no good reason. At least with 4k they built off the last standard but 1440 coming in after 1080 will forever boil the spergness in my skull
There were a lot of CRT users that held on to 640x480 well in to the 2000s.
>>108991662axtually even 720 was bullshit and it should've been 960 instead and then we should've had 1920 and just few years ago 3840 if even that
>>108991679I still have a 640x480 CRT and it looks perfectly fine 720p rips look amazing on it just imagine how much processing and storage would be saved if normalfags stopped feeding into meme resolutions
>>108991662So upgrade to 5K from 1440p
>>108991887That still doesn't solve 1080 scaling retard, nor does it magically make 5k a standard. As of now there's 480/576, 720, 1080, "4k"
Usecase for resolutions higher than 1280x800p?
use case for having a monitor?
>>108990625OP, ebussy himself uses 5K screenThe infamous "what makes you think sharpness is a metric?" quote exists because he genuinely couldn't fathom anything lower than 5K.
