>vibes for me, but not for thee smth smth
https://ladybird.org/posts/changing-how-we-develop-ladybird/
>>109006758wa'a wa'a wa'a
>we are putting a harder focus on code quality over code quantity by vetting who can contribute to our codebase in an era where every two-digit IQ retard sets up an OpenClaw bot to spam every FOSS repo with pull requests of useless unverified code so that they can lie on their resume that they're a FOSS developerUnfathomably based.
Who gives a fuck. They use Rust. Into the trash.
>>109006758Makes sense
>>109006758>we want to use sponsorship money to actually develop the browser instead of sifting and rejecting mountains of ai slopseems reasonable
>>109006798reality>we will take nothing, slop or otherwise, from others, in favor of our own slop
>>109006805reality>SAR I AM DEVELOPER DO NOT REDEEM REPO SAR I WANT CONTRIBUTE SAR PLS SAR YOURE RUINING MY IZZAT
>>109006780Hitler, from heaven: "You did well, my son"
>>109006758how long until this is reversed, like reversing the decision to use swift which was based on falling for>apple promised to make it a viable cross-platform option in the next version>>you know this gets said with every upcoming version, right?>yeah, but it's for realsies this time
>>109006812is the implication that they can't tell slopped jeet code from non-jeet code supposed to fill people with confidence?
>>109006812keeping 99% of jeets away is trivial. all you have to do is turn the project into a rust-exclusive one.
>>109006805its better to accept slop from people intimate enough with the code to know whats right or wrong. most foss ai slop is just pointing the latest chinese model at a freshly cloned repo and likely never reading any code at all
>>109006805>be construction foreman>ali, lebanese worker, just had a pager accident, leaving you short-handed (and him short a few fingers)There are two guys nearby who would lend you a hand. Who do you call in to take over Ali's jackhammer?>bob, former worker who got fat after retiring last year, and came here to chat and have some beers with you>deepak, total rando who's been watching your crew work for two hours, chilling in his garishly painted car
>>109007164>ladybird lead: neither. i just ask the LLM about how to do it a man short. this is the safest way.
>>109006923>most foss ai slop is just pointing the latest chinese model at a freshly cloned repo and likely never reading any code at allTruth. All the "lmfao AI is the future luddite" shitters on /g/ are shitskins, actual or mental, that refuse to accept that they're midwits and a blight upon the wider codescape. We need people who actually understand code more than ever, not a metric fuckton of LLM's spewing code that compiles but likely doesn't work or does something wrong with no one there to figure out what the fuck was wrong.A skilled developer with an agent to help out, that understands and verifies what the agent spews out, is infinitely better than on open Git repo where every faggot can point their OpenClaw instance towards to shit it up to get (You)'s on /g/ or whichever izzat token they're accepting.
oh yeah? where can I download the ISO?
>>109006758watching society literally crumble as the denial-of-service infects every public space is hilarious. the tragedy of the commons.
>>109006758are peasants allowed to leave feedback on PR's from the chosen people?might as well not do anything publicly anyway, and switch to code dumps (like Android).
>>109006758>We do not want issues, comments, email, or forks.>I (xe/xir) am happy to announce that we will be joining the GNOME project!
>>109006758> no contributors = no CoCCheckmate commies
addict gets a taste of money, abuses the people enabling him, betrays them. tale as old as time.
>>109006758anybody is free to prove them wrong. it's still open source, so, fork, accept patches, be faster, better than the upstream.but nobody will be able to.
>>109006758JBlow predicted this would happen.
>>109013277BlowJ said what
>>109013277who?
