File: 1778643063009390.png (925 KB, 981x936)

925 KB PNG

I specifically retire my drives when they go beyond ~80,000 hours

I replaced 4x4TB that were all around 77-87k hours back in december with 2x22TB drives.

Have used this drive for the past 9 years.

  9  Power_On_Hours           0x0012   097   097   000    Old_age   Always       -       21129
 12 Power_Cycle_Count       0x0032   099   099   000    Old_age   Always       -       5037

>>109007704
It’s dead Jim

File: 1497931675077.jpg (78 KB, 640x533)

78 KB JPG

>>109007704
I chucked away a 40GB IDE Seagate a few years ago with 110,000 on the clock. Not because it was broken or anything, it was just so small and IDE that it was useless for anything.
Connected it to my last computer with PCI (so I could use my 20yo PCI IDE RAID controller), dskwipe'd it for the day, threw it down the street a few times until it rattled sufficiently, then binned it.
Couldn't take a screenshot because, as is common with RAID controllers, it doesn't pass through S.M.A.R.T. data - so in the end, this post is nothing but an "honest guize".

>>109007704

SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16
Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds:
ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  9 Power_On_Hours          0x0012   097   097   000    Old_age   Always       -       25762

File: file.png (42 KB, 828x346)

42 KB PNG

>>109007704
the cluster dies when these give up, so... may they endure years more

>>109007704
Hello Mr. NSA, 87k hours on my HDD.

Wins what, a higher electricity bill?

>>109007704
I win

File: Screenshot (372).png (2.62 MB, 1920x1080)

2.62 MB PNG

>>109007704

>>109007704
like children...

ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME          FLAG     VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE      UPDATED  WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE
  9 Power_On_Hours_and_Msec 0x0032   000   000   000    Old_age   Always       -       928691h+14m+52.880s

Unusual format. Intel 520 series SSD from 2012.

>>109012120
>928691h
There have only been ~120,000 hours since 2012.

>>109012201
Not my problem.

>>109012250
Well considering SSDs didn't exist 100 years ago, im just going to assume it's wrong

>>109012295
Tell yourself whatever you need to hear.

>>109012120
>928691h
>105.99 years
Do you recall where you got that drive?

>>109012295

anon if you have three leyden cup and they can be charged and grounded is that not a ssd

File: goodburger.jpg (45 KB, 670x300)

45 KB JPG

good health still. i only reboot for windows updates

File: nas.jpg (35 KB, 653x223)

35 KB JPG

i had this guy plugged into my routers for years, completely forgot about it. not sure why it has so many power on counts.

my raid0 drives have 75k hours on them each (4x) but I can only read that info if I unplug it from my raid card, and i aint doing that.

File: qqqq.jpg (111 KB, 684x661)

111 KB JPG

>>109007704
still running since 2014. the other 2 in the pic are sata ssd's