what am I in for?
>>109009700rounded corners all the same size.slider to disable liquid glass to something more frosted glass looking like in Sequoia
>22GBSo much for being smaller due to dropping Intel support.
reverting back to sane UI
>>109009700>>109009708I hope it really is no Liquid Ass. Show us some screenshots when youre done updating please
>>109009700>betawhy would you? Anyway, Gemini Siri, mainly, if it's anything like iOS 27.
>>109009700Anal prolapse
>>109009708im putting that slider all the way to "clear" though>>109009714hurry uppp that's sexy>>109009723>why would you?see picrel
>>109009714>drop shadow on all sides>every button is in a pillIt still looks terrible compared to what Apple used to have.
>>109009740High sierra was peak MacOS. It still looks modern and stylish in current year
>>109009700jesus, 23GiB? for what?
>>109009777full OS install (no delta) + local models, I presume
>>109009700Disappointment and instability.
>>109009771Jony Ive really was a visionary. He might've gone off the deep end on thinness later on, but man did that guy have taste. I've got a 2013 Macbook Pro with Catalina on it that I still use when I travel and every time I use it I'm reminded of just how good a computer and it's OS can look, feel, and perform. Apple never should've changed it.
Tahoe was a buggy mess on release I'd never install such a buggy mess. I only updoot when the new MacOS version reaches a .1 release anyways.
>>109009810This time I will wait too, Tahoe was my first OS update because I started with an M4 chip which had Sequoia.
>>109009771I'm still on HS, I love how simple everything is
>>109009700slowly getting there.......... hurry up mf
>>109009700>what am I in for?Macos 27 beta
>>109009828alright, cya later guys
>beta
>>109009700>what am I in for?
>>109009851>eating isn't always a top priority this month???eating is a priority for me every month, otherwise i'd die
>>109009842A-anon....??
>>109009700>>109009739>>109009828>>109009842Post pics of the OS with maximum liquid ass, minimum liquid ass and with transparency disabled in the display settings page.I'm getting a new macbook soon and I want to see if it's worth updating to macos 27 on day one just for this.
>>109009897>I'm getting a new macbook soon and I want to see if it's worth updating to macos 27 on day one just for this.It will be, because otherwise you will be stuck with 26. Macs cannot downgrade to versions they never came with, so any new Mac sold today will only be able to use 26 or newer.
>tfw no apple TV, no homepod, no mac mini, no mac studio
>>109009929I know. But this is more about staying on v26 while waiting for v27.1 (which will take months but SHOULD be more stable) or jumping to v27.0 when it comes out to avoid Tahoe's version of liquid ass.
>>109009947that's fucking disgusting
>>10900995727 is already miles ahead of 26 even in dev beta 1. Just getting rid of the ultra round corners and the floating sidebars is a massive improvement.
>>109009957just wait for 28, they'll get it right eventually now that they fired Dye and his dream team of clueless jeets
>>109009700
>>109009890>>109009897im back; the new liquid glass shapes look really cool imothe transparency +- slider is kinda unneeded now that they flattened surfaces behind the buttons tho, pics of that when I find something at least somewhat representative
>>109010057>the transparency +- slider is kinda unneeded now that they flattened surfaces behind the buttons thois there a flat surface in the Preview app when opening a PDF for example?
>>109010057>still has those stupid hightlights on top and bottom, but not the sides>everything is still in a misshappen circle/pill>the context menus still have icons for some items, but not othersGarbage. Honestly even worse now that the sidebar is back to how it was in Sequoia.
>>109010123>the context menus still have icons the most annoying thing about nu-macOSaccording to Apple icons in menus were always forbidden, but after Liquid Ass they said fuck it, we want an icon shitshow in menus just like pcfags have in Windows. Bet it was some diversity hire POC roastie who decided to put this shit into macOS
>>109010057This is already looks better than what Tahoe has. It's closer to pre-liquid ass macOS, althought the ugly pill buttons are still present.
>>109009777for removed intel binaries
>>109009713>>109010321intel binaries are still there they need them for rosetta
>>109010110I can't into quality GIFs that don't make 4chan dot org spazz out, sohttps://x.com/BetaProfiles/status/2064070190686761144basically this but on macOS; but they clearly avoided having as many glass-intensive surfaces around, especially with the flattening of the sidebar, so the number of places you can see the difference is imo quite lightbut also im a liquid glass apologist and set it to max clear so>>109010295yeah it looks way better, and I already liked liquid ass to start with>>109010321intel support till macOS 28 it seems as per picrel (https://support.apple.com/en-us/102527)
>>109010057doesn't look too bad
>>109010343does Safari have translucent toolbar again? (content moves under when you scroll down)
>>109010123>>the context menus still have icons for some items, but not othersThat's how it's supposed to be, Rajeesh
>>109010295>>109010123>>109010057can't really see the difference with my finder right next to it...
>>109010360was it ever gone?
>>109010123you actually liked that retarded bugfested tahoe sidebar?
>>109009700You wouldn't believe how much bussy I pull with this bad boy.
>>109010360yes, whether or not to pick color from below is an option though (but not making the title bar fully opaque)>>109010381nta but I thought the floating-ish sidebar design looked nice; my only gripe with it was that they didn't take this opportunity to make them always collapsible at the same time...
>>109010375last i checked on tahoe it stayed solid color, no matter if images were behind toolbar
>>109010387it's not solid color, am on latest Tahoe
>>109010385nah bruh, full glass sidebar looks cooler and doesn't waste space, i even wrote hack for it, but tahoe performs so shit i uninstalled
>lets you get away from Windows but still keep all your pro appsI'm feeling the lure, folks.
>>109010424I'd been waiting for years for apple to make a decent desktop computer offering, bought that mac studio, and have loved it ever since
they brought back mickey mouse cursor
>>109010451Alright, I'm convinced. I'm installing this when it comes out.
>>109010338Aren't they dropping that too? I'd hate that some software I use will never be released in arm
>>109010338>>109010487
xcode 27 only arm... sucks ass
>>109009824>I'm still on HSMad man
Consider how shit Windows 11 is, then imagine if it were 5X worse, and 5X as expensive.That's the steaming heap of pajeet shit that is crapple pajeetOS, running on its own custom tailored specially designed first party apploo hardware.These street shitters cant even push out an update to their own hardware that they themselves designed down to every component, every chip, every resistor.Instead of 32675981375 trillion hardware combinations to test on, they literally have only 12 fixed spec models to test their updoots on but they can't even manage that without bricking their pajeet trash currybooks.
>>109009700macOS 27 sounds like something you'd make a meme out of just a couple years ago. They went ape shit with versioning.
>>109009700AIDS
>>109009845Eh, Apple betas are more polished and stable than Android releases most of the time
>>109011123You have said the actual truth.Notice the crApple shills evaucated the thread as soon as this got posted.
apple getting trash now, shame theres no competition
Personally it'd be nice if we all went back to mavericks or at least high sierra but I'll take the finder sidebar getting fixed at least. I don't think anyone's legally allowed to like the that hoe sidebar.
They didn't solve the slow ass animationsSet the refresh rate to anything over 60 and you'll have to disable animations completely
Are macos betas updated every week? I’m not brave enough for v1 but I’d be willing to roll the dice on v2You can restore OS painlessly with time machine, right?
>>109009700The end of the Intel chip era.>t. just got gifted my old Macbook Pro 16” 2019 in my workplace
>>109013132Incel macs were dogshit tho, which was the whole reason why apple silicon got built. Set up a linux on it and you have a decent movie machine since the screen is good, but that’s all it’s good for, they were loud, hot pieces of shit since day one.
>>1090131452016+ macbooks were supposed to be arm-based, they weren't designed to have intel housefire processors inside.
>>109013503>fineonly with a jet engine cooler and 1kg of copper heatpipes lol
all he does is posting screenshots and seethe
>>109009824High Sierra hasn't had security updates for over 5 years. You would be much better off putting Linux on that computer, since Linux distros get current security updates.HS only ran on x64 Macs right? And x64 Macs can run Linux just fine.
>>109009870Gay anal sex is more important than eating
>>109009700>what am I in for?No Intel support. Time to build your last MacPro. Max it's hardware specs out, fill it up with Internet-idependent software to the brim.Store it somewhere dry, dark and safe. Possibly sealed to avoid oxygen exposure as well. You will thank me later.Do the same with your jailbroken PS4 and Xbox360.
>>109011123Somehow this still seems better than Windows 11.This just seems more like if gnome was polished.
>>109013193M3 were basically overclocked M2, afaik. Fake filler gen.
Still running Catalina on my 2019 iMac. Last OS version solely meant for Intel.I don't have an iPhone, iPad, or Macbook so there's zero benefit in updating for the "productivity" features.Also the decision to turn macOS into iPadOS is disgusting.
>>109009700>22 GiB system imagegrim
>>109013594How will he even get comprised? I doubt he's downloading any software or tools at this point.
>>109011123>they literally have only 12 fixed spec models to test their updoots on but they can't even manage thatWas genuinely surprised by that. So many obvious visual glitches as if I were using Debian testing 5 years ago (modern one literally beats Apple in terms of consistent visuals and stability in general). Then I decided to take a look at dev tools by Apple and it is filled with negative comments criticizing complete abscense of obvious bugfixes in xcode for 5-10 years straight.Then turns out compile times on their hardware are NOT as good as you'd think. Almost as if benchmarks were faked.
>>109013677There are so many based attacks that have been seen to the public eye from the past 5 years its pretty easy imo.
>>109010415kekw, looks like GIMPtop bar - bunch of random UI elements thrown togetherbut now - with transparency
>>109013664>hardware raytracing>hardware av1 decoder>nested virtualizationnope
>>109013765also more than one external monitor on base M3
>>109009700I am so glad this year was about code improvements and walking back some of the liquid ass. This could be a Snow Leopard like release.
>updoot ipad>26.6 beta is 19GB>27 beta is 8GBhuh
>first dev beta runs better than 26.5, despite having always-on uplink to apple hq to siphon more data off of you than nsa doesit’s crazy how shit 26 was
>>109009771Mojave is better because it has dark mode.
updated macbook and it seems more or less finesome annoyances of glass rolled back but nothing truly majorperformance seems the same as before
>>109010057Sovless. It looks like windows
>>109013701well, presumably hes behind a nat router. for him to get hacked 'hands-free', someone would have to send him an insane packet that trips up the router, and then trips up his network card driver on the HS box. even in LLM-hellworld i would classify this as very unlikely.
>>109009700AI AI AI AI AI AI AIUnless you're a Eurochad, because the EU refuses to let Apple integrate their AI shit unless they allow you to choose the AI provider freely.Also expect lots of bugs.
>>109016607Yeah I have a friend who is on high sierra because of the Adobe CS6 only being 32 bit. I'm well versed in the yarr scene for Windows not so much for apple based systems.But the reason we went with high sierra or at least he did a long time ago was the stability. Anyway what security precautions do you reccomend? All I know he is behind a router with a good firewall that is IT.
>>109016625Oh and of course the 32 bit support might I add.
>>109010415Are the corners just for that app? that looks nice
>>109016625in LLM-hellworld, "good firewall" is harder to pin down. all firewalls run the linux kernel, and theyre running automated LLMs finding linux kernel vulns that have sat there for decades undetected, coming out like a factory conveyor belt.having said that, by definition there are a finite number of lines of code, syscalls, etc, so eventually the situation will stabilize, most of the bugs that could be found by the current-gen of LLMs will be found... ofcourse none of that applies to deprecated software...so maybe a better approach is to connect as little shit as possible and run as little software as you can, and the software that you run, ensure it has provenance (that it hasnt been tampered with) - that adobe CS6, i hope its from an official CD, and not a pirated iso, right? stuff like that.people lament the internet is much more centralized, but the centralization of the internet has vastly reduced attack vectors dependent on user action - if you're only ever going on 10 websites (youtube, 4chan, google, spotify, amazon, email), that removes a lot of threats.games can be an attack vector now, more than ever. youre opening a tcp connection to a mystery box, to a process on your local machine that has your user creds. if theres a vuln in your game engine (extremely high likelihood), a bad guy skin-suiting a game server can RCE you very easily.
>>109016691>games can be an attack vector now, more than ever. youre opening a tcp connection to a mystery boxkind of boomer-ing out here, ofcourse i dont think most people really host their own game servers in the traditional sense anymore (in many cases its not even possible)if its something like roblox, where (if i understand correctly) you can't host your own server in the traditional sense, but rather you can ask for the roblox platform to instantiate a 'server' on your behalf (to which you have admin access) - that ofcourse is different, since both you and all your users are only ever connecting to 1st party roblox-hosted code environments. the only way you can get hacked here is if the roblox platform has a vuln, and someone uses in-game scripting to exploit the roblox hosting environment itself.
>>109016691>that adobe CS6, i hope its from an official CD, and not a pirated iso, right?to add, this is maybe overly paranoid. provenance applies to this aswell: if you've got a 'well-known' pirated ISO, that was released prior to 2022, then in some sense that also counts as 'safe' software.
>>109016783yeah its as official as it gets its from the adobe servers alll thats changes is the a seperate program to generate the keygen and a block in the macOS firewall
>>109016616there's a single big "turn siri off" button if you don't like it anonalso>eurochadyeah>because the EUdon't care, not yuropoorthough either way it's a waitlist system atm; should be at the front of the queue but still waiting so far
>>109009700bricking the mac and having to open it up and pull the battery cablehappened to me last two times I updated my mac, so never again for me
>>109018523anon...
>>109018693nope its very common, mac users are just a cult tho and wont complain publicly once they have a fix
>>109009700>22gbis it compiling it from scratch?
>>109019085perhaps downloading on-device local models
>>109019118why download it when that thing cant run it?
>>109016691>games can be an attack vector now, more than ever. youre opening a tcp connection to a mystery box, to a process on your local machine that has your user creds. if theres a vuln in your game engine (extremely high likelihood), a bad guy skin-suiting a game server can RCE you very easily.cowadoody is a recent example of why you shouldn't play a game online without a sandbox.as you hinted, your user account is what most people will be most concerned with, not privilege escalation. the latter is only something server operators care about, since their user accounts generally speaking are more like service accounts that don't have access to anything outside of that service (if configured correctly), but a home users' user account has all their personal data, which is all a home user cares about
>>109009897This was in the keynote and/or the Platforms State of the Union
>>109011123Do iJeets really use this steaming heap of shit?
