https://archive.today/2026.06.09-153738/https://www.404media.co/judge-learns-lawyers-on-both-sides-of-case-used-ai-cancels-trial-kicks-everyone-off-the-case/>The lawyers on both sides of a federal court case in Mississippi were caught using artificial intelligence, a situation where, effectively, generative AI tools were used to argue against each other. The judge wrote in a blistering sanctions order, that the lawyers wasted the court’s time, and that “in an era of rampant unverified AI usage within the legal field, this case presents a prime example of the risk associated with serving as a rubber-stamp.”
posted this on /g/ because it has to do with (mis)use of technology in court.
Archive.today is a malicious site which has been known to manipulate archives to its own benefit.The original URL is here: https://www.404media.co/judge-learns-lawyers-on-both-sides-of-case-used-ai-cancels-trial-kicks-everyone-off-the-case/You should not trust archive.today / archive.fo / archive.to links, they may contain misinformation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance
>>109015966Oooof. They don’t even need an army of lawyers to stomp on us commoners. Actually, they’ll just use an army of ChatGPT powered super lawyers.
>>109015984see also pic related
>>109015994The DDOS stopped and it was in response to someone who doxxed the archive today owner.I'm not calling it a mature response, but it's not really that malicious. >>109015984>Archive.today is a malicious site which has been known to manipulate archives to its own benefit.This is leaving out important context. it was stuff related to their identity that they censored or covered up. They restored the archives after.And there's no way they're manipulating the millions of other archived pages stored.This isn't wikipedia. The page is a useful reference, but We aren't required to hold ourselves to their editing standards.I do wish there was a better archive source that could be used on there though.
>>109015989>Oooof. They don’t even need an army of lawyers to stomp on us commoners.>Actually, they’ll just use an army of ChatGPT powered super lawyers.that wont work, chatgpt fucks this stuff up
>>109015966Uh oh, melty.
>>109015966sure judge dude, like you didn't write that with chatgpt.
>>109015966disbar him, his job isn't deciding how you create your defense or prosecution, if he can;t deal with AI sentences he is not qualified to read any other sentence
I feel like it's a contempt of court thing
>>109015966Rare case of a based judge. Lawyers using AI should have their license revoked and be banished to flipping burgers at mcondalds
>>109019790>On December 10, 2025, the Court entered an Order to Show Cause directing all counsel of record in this case to show cause as to why the Court should not impose sanctions against them pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court’s Local Rules, and/or its inherent authority for filing legal memoranda containing hallucinated case citations.
>>109016038kekidk why people are bitching about archive.is being LE MALICIOUS when all they did is ddos some faggot's blogpage
>>109019790Why are you recommending removing the judge's license to practice law instead of removing him from the bench?Also, the problem is that these lawyers casually tossed fabricated garbage into the courtroom that the judge had to then read. If this was pre-AI and they'd deliberately or somehow accidentally come up with fake citations, they'd probably be getting something stiffer than a couple grand in fines. AI is a mitigating factor, because the judge is being kind enough to assume that they're just lazy and retarded rather than malicious or totally inept.If you submit a memorandum containing good legal arguments and 100% valid citations that happened to be generated by AI, and were able to argue from it effectively in court, then nobody would have a problem with it, just like nobody cares if you use a digitized database of case law instead of looking things up in paper. The issue is, as always, idiots tossing garbage over the fence.
>>109015966Lawyers are crooked goons. They all need to be replaced by AI.
>>109015966Did the judge take issue with the AI itself, or the number of errors that the AI made?
>>109020890that wont work
>>109020890They will be replaced by AI.Law = language. LLM is much better than any lawyer can possibly be.
>>109015966>>“in an era of rampant unverified AI usage within the legal field, this case presents a prime example of the risk associated with serving as a rubber-stamp.”judge responds with AI
>>109025055The problem is accountability. Who pays if a lawyer AI does flagrantly illegal and retarded shit?
>>109025389Maybe replace the judges too. Judges are already immune, this is the perfect environment for a black box with no accountability.
>>109025389The lawyer should pay. You shouldn't be so stupid to put your signature as an attorney at least without checking the AI slop.t. Lawyer and attorney at law.
>>109026107I agree, I was replying to the anon that suggested that lawyers themselves could he replaced by AI.
>>109025433...הנה שפט ברזל
>>109015966the accused should have an AI take its place in that matter.you can't charge a man, and have a machine do the arguing, it defeats the purpose of man having received the law and authority to carry out judgment.
>>109019978quite based, I supposeyou have good taste, in fact
