> Totally bro, let's version control every keystroke and every conversation > We're going to read it all later bro, trust mehttps://zed.dev/blog/introducing-deltadb
another quality technology thread
This is the problem with larpers and the lack of proper education. To make accurate predictions one must work at the proper level of abstraction, all else is just noise and will lead to divergent predictions sooner than otherwise. The level of abstraction is HIGHER than commits not lower.
every time i read a "sign up/sign in" on a product's website i already know it's shit
Am I missing something here? You have to run shatbots in a loop with prewritten unit tests until it gets it right in order to accomplish anything, the transactional model of git is absolutely suited to this use case (assuming you actually want to write verified bug-free software)
>>109035214Read the article, they're building some shit called DeltaDB to record your every keystroke and every conversation, so changes and your thought process are auditable. It's like screen capture for text editors, absolute spyware.
You can argue linking an LLM session to a PR or commit could be useful, but likely it's just going to bloat the context when an agent reads it. No human is going to anyway.
