> Intel x86 processors with NVIDIA RTX graphics reportedly planned for 2028https://videocardz.com/newz/intel-x86-processors-with-nvidia-rtx-graphics-reportedly-planned-for-2028
They are betraying their own graphics division?
>>109066107seems like it
I'm getting AMD ATI flashbacks here but this time the other way around.They will probably just buy Intlel soon
What will this mean for Arc?
>>109066090>2028Too far in the future
I don't want intel x86I want nvidia x86
>>109066107planning for the pop
>>109066107That scamming jeet fucked another company lel
nvidias going to move consumer nodes to intlel and keep TSMC for enterprise cards. its never been more over
didn't intel do the same thing with AMD graphics like a decade ago?
>>109066107>betrayingThe Arc team is decent and accomplished a lot with little but ultimately irrelevant in the big picture because they cannot compete. This is not a garage startup industry. You expect the CPU company to prioritize their GPU division just because it's a novelty to customers? Partnering with Nvidia and providing DLSS on a single chip is obviously something that is going to help them push a lot of units, especially important when they are trying to claw back relevance from AMD (even if this is a lesser concern for DIY market).
>>109066090Remember when Intel wouldn't even acknowledge AMD's existence? kek
>>109066304Yeah.>>109066210If you have any sense you're staying away from Intel for another 3 years minimum after the shit they pulled in the last defective CPU fiasco.
>>109066107>invest 6 year worth of driver debelopment across windoze and loonix>throw it all awaySasuga intel manager
>>109066107Their own graphics division is into dedicated datacenter gpus these days.
>>109066090kek. x86 got outdated years ago. If you're going to put the cpu in the gpu mobo then it's just another apu with more power running into it. not putting a x64 cpu in the gpu is a mistake or a tactical business move.
>>109066788>x86 got outdated years ago.retard detected
>RTX 6050 6GB entry level GPU for only $1599, it's a total bargain goy! gotta go buy one now before they put the prices up again!the future of pc gaming is looking bright
>>109066090>no super>6000 series delayed>it'll be fabbed by incel and not tsmcguess I'm sticking with 4070ti until 2030
Is this gonna completely replace their own igpus/gpus or is this gonna be a side thing? Seems crazy to just give up on igpus after making so much progress. The panther lake stuff is impressive and had me slightly hopeful for the future. If we get nvidia igpus it seems like it's gonna get even more expensive.
>>109068748rubin is not delayed, it's already been in production for months and shipped to partners for testing. the gaming version isn't going to be much better than blackwell besides gains from node improvements (which are substantial since blackwell released on an old node to begin with). but the arch is made for AI improvements, not for raster performance, it's fucking over for raster-lovers
>>109068748like a week ago videocardz had an article that said that 50 super might be back on track
>>109066107You you honestly trust Raja to deliver anything of value?
>>109066788instruction set hasn't mattered since the 90s dumbass
>>109066332DLSS is an anti-feature
>>109069383DLSS haters are all retards
>>109066254>scamming jeetaren't both Intel and Nvidia run by chinks?
DLSS badPoor people badDLAA is goodRich people good
>>109069428Simple as.
woah, they are making a new igpu or sum, i hope its, good.
>>109066107Intel GPUs compete on the low endNVIDIA GPUs compete on the high endCompletely different markets. Intel has NO actual GPU that can compete with ANY of NVIDIA's
>>109068197>>109069196it's a 32 bit cpu. we have been on 64 bit for around 20 years. try again troll.
>>109069929I game in 4k all the time on a battlemage. They are fine.
shant be buying
>>109069954x86 is shorthand for x86_64, you fucking retard. nobody is making 32bit cpus anymore
>>109068885its probably just a one-off sku, if not for the simple fact that nvidia is insufferable to work with. literally all their partnershits go south
>>109070051no it isn't you dip shit. they are trying to sell you junk. x86 is 32-bit, x64 is 64-bit. quit spreading disinfo nvidia shill.
>>109070272nvidia is cancer and youre retarded
>>109070349putting an apu in the gpu mobo is the right move but nvidia is cancer. you're not a technician clearly.
>>109070051>>109070272There is no consistent naming for x86 though...
>>109069417AI upscaled slop lovers have killed 3d graphics. You could have said no. But you just had to slurp up whatever slop njudea gives you.
>>109070435Apps are clearly labeled x86 or x64 when you download them if they come in 32bit and 64bit versions.
>>109066090Pest and Cholera, in one neat package
>>109070272Insane bait
>>109070552Ignorance is bliss i suppose. Don't google search shit. Kek.
>>109070523x64 is the Windows ABI name for 64bit x86. AMD64 is the Sys V-likes ABI name. Intel calls it IA-64 as well. Again, there isn't a very clear name for the architecture itself. x86_64 seems universally agreed to in target triple names.
>>109070801only i just did a fresh install on a old legacy computer a little while ago so i know what the fuck i'm talking about.
>>109070801>Intel calls it IA-64 as welluh, just kys already
when will intel learn
>>109072001Being the Wymerica socialist microchip company means you don't have to learn shit.
>>109070801>IA-64That's itanium, IA-32 is x86 but intel genuinely thought that itanium would replace x86, and they could get away with dropping 32bit support.AMD64 is a calling convention for system V which is unix I think, but it's completely unrelated. But nobody calls x64 AMD64 except libraries that support itanium (such as dbghelp for debug info), because it's easy to mix up x86_64 with IA-64, when 32bit x86 is also called IA-32.x86_64 and i686 is used often for linux packages (I think they got rid of this when they got rid of 32bit packages?), but on windows x86 / x64 is used for the build tree of Visual Studio projects.
>>109072642oh ok
>>109073007Oh nevermind, System V AMD64 ABI is something else.I assumed that C++ Itanium (VERY confusing that this also shares the name of Intel Itanium, it's different) also applies the calling convention for C, but that is not true.So System V AMD64 is a important thing to understand the assembly that makes C functions work in linux and windows uses it's own format. Useful new info for me I guess.
fuck ngreedia
>>109073007Revive it, revive itanic, make it float again!This time we just use AI as a compiler and pray!
>>109066449> last defective CPU fiascoI got a full refund 14900k and bought another 14900k to replace it for $100 cheaper. The replacement CPU has had no issues and is warranted until 2029. Don’t tell that fat fuck from Gamers Nexus though. He’s got a narrative to spin.
>>109073796why are you lying
>>109073849hes coping, there is definitely no rust in his cpu
>>109073796My 14600k has been rock solid stable. Been using it since January.
>>109076379most people say that mostly 14900ks are affected i dont even know if 14700ks really got the rust
